226894 research outputs found
Sort by
(Modified S. 75) a Bill
No full textDocument: Modified S. 75, Draft, 2/2/65, page 25(4) accept for any of its purposes and functions appropriations, donations, and grants of money, equipment, supplies, materials, facilities, and services, and receive, utilize, and dispose of the same; and
(5) incur such necessary expenses and exercise such other powers as are consistent with and reasonably required to perform its functions under this section.
(e) The Commission shall determine the proportionate shares of its expenses which shall be borne by the Federal Government and each of the States. The Commission shall prepare a budget annually and transmit it to the Federal departments and the States. Estimates of proposed appropriations from the Federal Government shall be included in the budget estimates submitted by the Secretary of the Interior under the Budgeting and Accounting Act of 1921, as amended, and may include an amount for advance to the Commission against State appropriations for which delay is anticipated by reason of later legislative sessions.
TITLE VII -- APPROPRIATIONS
There are hereby authorized to be appropriated such sums as are required to carry out the purposes of this Act.
25
2/2/65Epson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 8 bit, 859,800 byte
Letter Concerning Agreement
No full textLetter: From Irvine H. Sprague, to Orren Beaty, January 26, 1965 (thermofax), page 1STATE OF CALIFORNIA-REVENUE AND MANAGEMENT AGENCY
EDMUND G. BROWN, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
1725 K ST., N.W.
WASHINGTON, D.C.
January 26, 1965
Mr. Orren Beaty
Special Assistant to the Secretary
Department of Interior
Washington, D. C.
Dear Orren:
Reference is made to your note of January 25 enclosing a draft memorandum of understanding of the January 21 meeting concerning the Colorado River.
The memorandum accurately reflects the agreements reached.
The agreement represented a concession on the part of Arizona in guaranteeing California consumptive use of 4.4 million acre feet of water from the mainstream of the Colorado until works are built and in operation to bring a minimum of 2.5 million acre feet of additional water into the mainstream below Lee Ferry; and a concession on the part of California in dropping the insistance that there by an immediate conditional authorization of the import works and a perpetual guarantee.
I further understand that the agreement included the immediate authorization and construction of theCentral Arizona Project as part of the regional plan and that the draft vehicle for a new regional water plan shall be S. 75, modified as required by language from S. 294 and the Pacific Southwest Water Plan.
May I suggest that persons present at the January 21 meeting today confirm this understanding as the basic framework under which new legislation will be drafted.
May I further suggest that a drafting committee be named by the Secretary to include representatives from Governor Brown, Governor Goddard, Senator Kuchel, Senator Hayden, the Colorado River Board and the Metropolitan Water District.
Governor Brown's representatives to the drafting committee are now en route to Washington and will be available for the first drafting session tomorrow.Epson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 8 bit, 1,471,485 byte
Notes--Friday - Aiken Called
No full textNotes: no title, "Friday- Aiken…..", 1963, page 17SLU: knowns battle that is going on in the State on Public-put.
Power
Explains preference clause-history facts-etc.
Fannin: Set the dateEpson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 24 bit, 986,160 byte
House Worksheet
No full textDocument: "House Worksheet", lightly hand annotated house voting record, 1961-1969, page 13Democrats Republicans
RHODE ISLAND
2 Fogarty
1 St. Germain
SOUTH CAROLINA
4 Ashmore
3 Dorn
5 Hemphill
6 McMillan
2 Riley
1 Rivers
SOUTH DAKOTA
2 Berry
1 Reifel
TENNESSEE
6 Bass 2 Baker
9 Davis 1 Reece
8 Everett
4 Evins
3 Frazier
5 Loser
7 MurrayEpson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 8 bit, 546,515 byte
House Worksheet
No full textDocument: "House Worksheet", lightly hand annotated house voting record, 1961-1969, page 14Democrats Republicans
TEXAS
3 Beckworth 5 Alger
2 Brooks
17 Burleson
22 Casey
7 Dowdy
21 Fisher
13 Ikard
20 Kilday
15 Kilgore
19 Mahon
1 Patman
11 Poage
4 Rayburn
18 Rogers
16 Rutherford
6 Teague
8 Thomas
9 Thompson
10 Thornberry
12 Wright
14 Young
UTAH
2 King
1 Peterson
VERMONT
AL StaffordEpson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 8 bit, 557,289 byte
House Worksheet
No full textDocument: "House Worksheet" heavily hand annotated house voting record, 1961-1969, page 20#609
Cy anderson
Cleve Baily
Gians
Bray
Forces
Serwingle
Thompson la
Walls la
Boggs-Power
Prince-Lawgand
Macclonal
Dulsie-Manager
Slu-Herphen
(BW Brawley)
For Jurney-feature
1 o' LorhiEpson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 8 bit, 544,706 byte
Notes--History
No full textNotes: "History, Our Plan and Objective", 1961-1969, page 2OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR
POSITION:
will recommend if they will supportEpson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 24 bit, 1,011,572 byte
Document Concerning Resolution
No full textDocument: Metropolitian Water District of Souther California resolution, 1965? (photocopy), page 1WHEREAS, the Colorado River Board of California, after careful study and consultation with interested groups, has adopted the following Resolution:
"The Colorado River Board recommends that if the Central Arizona Project is to be authorized, that authorization should be contained in a Pacific Southwest Plan, as one of the following three interrelated provisions:
"1. Authorization for the construction, operation and maintenance of works to import not less than 2.5 million acre feet annually into the main stream of the Colorado River below Lee Ferry, as the first stage of a regional importation plan adequate to protect existing economies and provide water for filling Upper Basin reservoirs and refilling Lake Mead, as well as providing water for the Central Arizona Project. The congressional authorization may be made conditional, as has been done in several other statutes, on the promulgation by the President or Secretary of the Interior of findings of feasibility. A portion of the cost, fairly related to the relief of shortages occasioned by the Mexican Treaty burden, should be non-reimbursable.
"To the extent that importation of water into the Colorado River System is necessary in order to make sufficient water available for release, as determined by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to Article II (B) (1) of the decree of the United States Supreme Court in Arizona v. California, et al., to satisfy annual consumptive use of 2,800,000 acre-feet in Arizona, 4,400,000 acre-feet in California and 300,000 acre-feet in Nevada, respectively, the Secretary shall make such imported water available to the holders of contracts with the United States for the storage and delivery of main stream water in those states at the same cost, and on the same terms, as would be applicable if main stream water were available for release in the quantities required to supply such consumptive use.
"2. Authorization for construction of the Central Arizona Project, with a diversion capacity of 1.2 million acre feet as planned, subject to the following condition.
"3. The Secretary of the Interior shall administer Article II (B) (3) of the Supreme Court's decree (which relates to the insufficiency of water to supply 7.5 million acre feet in consumptive use), as follows: diversions for the Central Arizona Project shall be limited to the extent necessary to assure the availability of water to satisfy 4.4 million acre feet of consumptive use in California, plus the satisfaction of present perfected rights in Arizona and Nevada and the satisfaction of the government's contracts with water users in those two states made before passage of the Act, until the President proclaims that works have been completed and are in operation, which are (i) capable of continuously delivering water in aggregate annual quantities of not lessEpson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 8 bit, 2,300,624 byte
S. 294 In the Senate of the United States
No full textDocument: 89th Congress, 1st Session, S.294, January 6, 1965, page 33
1 priate intervals of time, of the Colorado River Basin, as
2 defined in the Colorado River compact, and of each major
3 geographical component of that basin.
4 (2) The estimated dependable supply of the Colorado
5 River system, as that system is defined in said compact, avail-
6 able for the partial satisfaction of the water requirements
7 so estimated, and supplies from other sources now utilized
8 for the partial satisfaction of such requirements.
9 (3) Means for the more effective utilization of water
10 in the Colorado River Basin, including, but not limited to,
11 reduction in evaporation and transpiration losses; reduction
12 in distribution losses; improvement of drainage facilities;
13 maintenance of water quality; management of ground water
14 basins; renovation of effluents, etc.
15 (4) The quantities of water which must be added to
16 those presently available for use in the Colorado River Basin,
17 in order to satisfy the deficiencies between the estimated
18 requirements of that basin, and the estimated supply, taking
19 into account the dependable supply of the Colorado River
20 system, effectively utilized, and presently utilized supplies
21 from other sources.
22 (5) The sources from which the required quantities of
23 additional water can be obtained. Sources to be investigated
24 shall include, but shall not be limited to, salvage operations
25 on the main stream of the Colorado River and its tributaries;Epson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 8 bit, 1,766,964 byte
S. 294 In the Senate of the United States
No full textDocument: 89th Congress, 1st Session, S.294, January 6, 1965, page 2323
1 the same, together with his allocations of such costs among
2 the categories stated in section 302.
3 SEC. 804. REPAYMENT OF REIMBURSABLE COST ALLO-
4 CATIONS.-(a) The costs of each feature allocated to irri-
5 gation and to be repaid by the water users shall be repaid
6 from the development fund to the general fund within a
7 period not exceeding fifty years from the date of completion
8 of each such feature, exclusive of any development periods
9 authorized by the reclamation law.
10 (b) The costs of each feature allocated to commercial
11 power or municipal and industrial water supply shall be
12 repaid from the development fund to the general fund of the
13 Treasury within a period not exceeding fifty years from the
14 date of completion of each such feature.
15 (c) The costs of each feature allocated to irrigation
16 which are in excess of the repayment capability of the water
17 users shall be repaid from the development fund to the gen-
18 eral fund of the Treasury out of net power revenue within a
19 period not exceeding fifty years from the date of completion
20 of each such feature.
21 (d) The reimbursable portions of the costs allocated
22 to each stage of the transmountain division shall be repaid
23 from the development fund to the general fund of the
24 Treasury within a period of seventy-five years from the date
25 of completion of the works encompassed in that stage.Epson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 8 bit, 1,915,680 byte