226894 research outputs found
Sort by
Committee Print No. 25
Document: Committee Print No.25, July 6, 1966, Subcommittee Amendment to H.R. 4671, 89th Congress, 2D Session, page 3737
1 charge, or extract any compensation, or in any other manner
2 restrict the access or use of the paved road to be constructed
3 within the Hualapai Indian reservation pursuant to this Act.
4 The use by the public of the water areas of the project shall
5 be pursuant to such rules and regulations as the Secretary
6 may prescribe.
7 Except as limited by the foregoing, the Hualapai Tribe
8 shall have the right to use and occupy the taking area of the
9 Hualapai unit within the Hualapai Reservation for all pur-
10 poses not inconsistent with the construction, operation, and
11 maintenance of the project and townsite, including, but not
12 limited to, the right to lease such lands for farming, grazing,
13 and business purposes to members or nonmembers of the tribe
14 and the power to dispose of all minerals as provided in para-
15 graph (c) hereof.
16 (e) Upon a determination by the Secretary that all or
17 part of the lands acquired by the United States pursuant to
18 paragraph (a) of this section no longer are necessary for
19 purposes of the project, all right, title and interests in such
20 lands shall thereupon vest in the Hualapai Tribe.
21 (f) No part of any expenditures made by the United
22 States, and no reservation by or restoration to the Hualapai
23 Tribe of any interest in land, under any of the provisions
24 of this section shall be charged by the United States as an
25 offset or counterclaim against any claim of the HualapaiEpson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 8 bit, 1,668,390 byte
Committee Print No. 25
Document: Committee Print No.25, July 6, 1966, Subcommittee Amendment to H.R. 4671, 89th Congress, 2D Session, page 4848
1 (f) Imported water not delivered into the Colorado
2 River system but diverted from the works constructed to
3 import water into that system shall be made available to
4 water users in accordance with the Federal reclamation laws.
5 SEC. 306. The main stream salvage unit shall include
6 programs for water salvage along and adjacent to the main
7 stream of the Colorado River and for ground water recovery.
8 Such programs shall be consistent with maintenance of a
9 reasonable degree of undisturbed habitat for fish and wildlife
10 in the area, as determined by the Secretary.
11 SEC. 307. The Secretary shall construct, operate, and
12 maintain such additional works as shall from time to time
13 be authorized by the Congress as units of the project.
14 SEC. 308. (a) The Secretary shall, in a manner con-
15 sistent with the other purposes of this Act, (1) investigate,
16 plan, construct, operate, and maintain or otherwise provide for
17 basic public outdoor recreation facilities adjacent to reser-
18 voirs, canals, and other similar features of the units, and
19 facilities and measures for the conservation and development
20 of fish and wildlife as the Secretary finds to be appropriate;
21 (2) acquire or otherwise include lands and interests in lands
22 necessary for the aforesaid facilities and necessary for pres-
23 ent and future public recreation use of areas adjacent to reser-
24 voirs, canals, and similar features included in the authorized
25 units; (3) conserve the scenery, the natural, historic, andEpson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 8 bit, 1,969,565 byte
Committee Print No. 25
Document: Committee Print No.25, July 6, 1966, Subcommittee Amendment to H.R. 4671, 89th Congress, 2D Session, page 5050
1 made in each case in which the lands adjacent to a reservoir
2 are located wholly within the exterior boundaries of a national
3 forest unless the Secretaries of Agriculture and Interior
4 jointly determine otherwise. Where any lands are trans-
5 ferred hereunder to the jurisdiction of the Secretary of
6 Agriculture, the lands involved shall become national forest
7 lands: Provided, That the lands and waters within the flow
8 lines of any reservoir or otherwise needed or used for the
9 operation of the authorized units for other purposes shall
10 continue to be administered by the Secretary to the extent he
11 determines to be necessary for such operation.
12 (d) Nothing in this section shall limit the authority of
13 the Secretary under existing provisions of law relating to
14 recreation and fish and wildlife conservation and develop-
15 ment at water resource projects or to disposition of public
16 lands for recreation purposes.
17 SEC. 309. The Secretary shall integrate the Dixie proj-
18 ect and Southern Nevada water supply project heretofore
19 authorized into the project herein authorized as units thereof
20 under repayment arrangements and participation in the
21 development fund established by title IV of this Act con-
22 sistent with the provisions of this Act.
23 SEC. 310. There is hereby authorized to be appropriated
24 to carry out the purposes of this title the sum of $1,395,-
25 000,000, based on estimated costs as of October, 1963, plusEpson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 8 bit, 1,752,625 byte
Committee Print No. 25
Document: Committee Print No.25, July 6, 1966, Subcommittee Amendment to H.R. 4671, 89th Congress, 2D Session, page 5252
1 priate among the project functions. Costs of construction,
2 operation, and maintenance allocated to the replenishment of
3 the depletion of Colorado River flows available for use in the
4 United States occasioned by compliance with the Mexican
5 Water Treaty (including losses in transit, evaporation from
6 regulatory reservoirs, and regulatory losses at the Mexican
7 boundary, incurred in the transportation, storage, and de-
8 livery of water in discharge of the obligations of that treaty)
9 shall be nonreimbursable. All funds paid or transferred to
10 Indian tribes pursuant to this Act, including interest on such
11 funds in the Treasury of the United States, and costs of con-
12 struction of the paved road, authorized in section 303 (b)
13 hereof, shall be nonreimbursable. Costs allocated to recrea-
14 tion and fish and wildlife enhancement shall be nonreim-
15 bursable within appropriate limits determined by the Secre-
16 tary to be consistent with the provisions of law and policy
17 applicable to other similar Federal projects and programs:
18 Provided, That all of the separable and joint costs allocated
19 to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement at the Dixie
20 project and the main stream reservoir division shall be non-
21 reimbursable. Costs allocated to nonreimbursable purposes
22 shall be nonreturnable under the provisions of this Act. Costs
23 allocated to the additional capacity of the system of main con-
24 duits and canals of the Central Arizona unit, referred to in
25 section 304 (a), item (1), in excess of two thousand five hun-Epson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 8 bit, 1,790,386 byte
Letter Concerning Lake Powell
Letter: To Mr. Vaud E. Larson, from Art Greene, June? 1966? (thermofax), page 2And I think the finest tribute I heard paid Rainbow Bridge was by an old cowboy who was a scout for the movie people locating beauty spots for them. This fellow wore very thick specs, looked at me, pulled the specs off, mopped a tear out of his eye, and said, "Art, what makes them damn shivers run up my back."
Yes, I am glad I lost that battle. (Over construction of Glen Canyon Dam.)
But I feel I won the war.
Kindest regards,
Art (Art Greene)
Page, Ariz.Epson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 8 bit, 3,294,833 byte
Dallas Creek Project
Attachment 3, Dallas Creek Project, page 9an interest rate of 3-1/8 percent, indicates that the estimated total annual benefits of the project would exceed the average annual equivalent cost in the ratio of 1.89 to 1.00. The ratio of direct benefits to cost is evaluated to be about 1.17 to 1.00.
9Epson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 8 bit, 452,106 byte
Statement of Assistant Secretary Kenneth Holum
Document: Statement of Asst Sec Kenneth Holum, Dept of the Interior before the Subcommittee on Irrigation and Reclamation on H.R. 4671 and Companion Bills, May 10, 1966 (photocopy), page 5establish equitable criteria for the operation of the major reservoirs in the Colorado River system. It further sets certain guidelines to be observed. The language of Section 601 was developed and adopted only after long and exhaustive negotiations between Upper and Lower Basin interests. We endorse the objective of this section and find the guidelines to be reasonable and workable.
Commissioner Dominy has a more detailed statement both in respect to Title V and to Section 601. His statement will complete the formal presentation of the Administration's views on these new additions to H. R. 4671 and companion bills.
5Epson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 8 bit, 604,336 byte
Repayment of Theodore Roosevelt Dam
Document: "Repayment of Theodore Roosevelt Dam", 1967?, (photocopy) page 1REPAYMENT OF THEODORE ROOSEVELT DAM
The construction of the Theodore Roosevelt Dam was started in 1903 and completed in 1911. Under repayment contract with the Salt River Valley Water Users' Association dated September 6, 1917, the Association assumed obligation to repay construction costs in the amount of 10,937,872 has been fully repaid by the Salt River Valley Users' Association.
In 1950 a rehabilitation and betterment program was begun on the Salt River Project with the total work program to be accomplished scheduled over a period of several years. It is estimated that the rehabilitation and betterment of the Theodore Roosevelt Dam will cost $115,900. This cost will be recouped under existing rehabilitation and betterment contracts with Salt River Valley Water Users' Association.
The Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District operates the Salt River Project in conjunction with the Salt River Valley Water Users' Association. The District, in addition to the Theodore Roosevelt Dam, operates other hydroelectric and thermal powerplants and transmission facilities and markets power from the system throughout Maricopa, Gila, and Pinal Counties.Epson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 8 bit, 2,261,050 byte
Repayment of Theodore Roosevelt Dam
Document: "Repayment of Theodore Roosevelt Dam", 1967?, (photocopy) page 2The total generating capacity, including contract capacity, of the system in 1965 was 919,462 kw of which only 70,490 was hydro power, including 19,290 at Theodore Roosevelt Dam which is the only federally financed powerplant.
Estimated gross revenues from power for 1966 were 1,800,000 of voluntary contributions in lieu of taxes) were 770,000 would be the hydro power component. These revenues were applied as follows:
Payment to bond principal, reserve funds, and U. S. debt, 3,650,000.
Advances to Salt River Valley Water Users' Association for OM&R and additions to facilities (which is in effect a power subsidy to water users), 5,588,000.
Balance available for power district construction over and above depreciation, $970,000.
2Epson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 8 bit, 2,138,179 byte
Central Arizona Project - S. 75 - Eighty-First Congress
Document: "Central Arizona Project - S. 75-- Eighty-First Congress Passed Senate- 55-28- February 21, 1950", 1961-1969, page 3Paired or Announced For
1. Anderson (D.N.M.)
2. Young (R.N.D.)
3. Thomas (D. Okla)x
4. Myers (D. Pa)x
Paired or Announced against
1. Frear (D. Del.)x
2. George (D. Ga)x
3. Saltonstall (R. Mass)
4. Cordon (R. Oreg)x
5. Robertson (D. Va)
Not Voting or Announced
1. Pepper (D. Fla)x
2. Vandenberg (R. Mich)x
3. Humphrey (D. Minn)
4. Bridges (R. N. H.)x
1. Voting for, 55; still in office, 15.
2. Voting against, 28; still in office, 6.
3. Announced for, 4; still in office, 2.
4. Announced against, 5; still in office, 2.
5. Not voting, 4; still in office, 1.
3Epson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 8 bit, 1,968,602 byte