Theory and Practice of Jurisprudence (E-Journal - Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University)
Not a member yet
595 research outputs found
Sort by
Визначення проблеми злочинності на етапі підготовчих процедур системного аналізу держави Україна
Get PDFThe article presents the results of the preparatory stage of the system analysis of the system of the state of Ukraine. The goal, purpose, functions, environment, boundaries of this system are revealed, the problem of crime is formalized. Outlines the prospects for further stages of the study.The Ukrainian society obviously needs the newest techniques which will become a theoretical basis for criminalization counteraction. We consider it expedient to use a system approach while solving problem of criminality and conduct a system analysis of the state Ukraine. The goal of the system of the state Ukraine shall be deemed to be human rights and freedoms. The functions of the system of the state Ukraine shall be statements and enforcement of human rights and freedoms. The designation of the system of the state Ukraine shall be guarantee of human rights and freedoms. Legislatively it is regulated by the provisions of Article 3 of the Constitution of Ukraine.Criminality is a problem of gap between the functions of the system of the state Ukraine and its designation. Criminality is also a problem of disadvantages in the interaction of the system of the state Ukraine with own environment.The aim of our system analysis shall be considered to be1) creation of the generalized conceptual model of the system operation of the state Ukraine and its interaction with the environment; 2) development of recommendations for solving mentioned problems related to the criminality.В статье изложены результаты подготовительного этапа системного анализа системы государства Украина. Раскрыты цель, назначение, функции, окружение, границы этой систем, формализуется проблема преступности. Очерчены перспективы дальнейших этапов исследованияНаведено результати підготовчого етапу системного аналізу держави Україна. Розкрито мету, призначення, функції, оточення, кордони цієї системи, формалізовано проблему злочинності. Окреслено перспективи подальших етапів дослідження
Треті особи, які не заявляють самостійних вимог щодо предмета спору: окремі питання доктрини та законодавчі тренди
Get PDFThe article is devoted to the study of legislative changes in the institute of third parties that do not declare independent claims on the subject of the dispute that occurred in recent years. The issues of attracting third parties to a civil case on the initiative of the court, participation in the process of the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption, and the availability of a time frame for third parties to enter the case are considered from a critical point of view.By the current legislation, third parties who do not declare independent claims regarding the subject matter of the dispute, are classified in the civil party. In the context of the modern edition of the CPC of Ukraine, they are considered one of the most important figures in the civil process, they belong to a circle of persons with legal interest in the resolution and consideration of civil cases.A scientific analysis of the legislative trends concerning the institution of third parties who do not declare independent claims on the subject of the dispute allows for significant comments regarding the legislative changes that have taken place in recent years, not all changes can be evaluated positively.Correction of the committed mistakes due to incorrect understanding of the legal personality of third parties who do not declare independent claims regarding the subject matter of the dispute, requires further legislative work.Статья посвящена исследованию законодательных изменений в институте третьих лиц, не заявляющих самостоятельных требований на предмет спора, произошедших за последние годы. Под критическим углом зрения рассматриваются вопросы привлечения третьих лиц в гражданское дело по инициативе суда, участие в процессе Национального агентства по вопросам предотвращения коррупции, а также наличие временних рамок относительно вступления третьих лиц в дело.Досліджено законодавчі зміни в інституті третіх осіб, які не заявляють самостійних вимог щодо предмета спору, що відбулись за останніх років. Під критичним кутом зору розглянуто питання притягнення третіх осіб у цивільну справу за ініціативою суду, участь у процесі в статусі третьої особи Національного агентства з питань запобігання корупції, а також наявність часових меж щодо вступу третіх осіб у справу
Правове регулювання неплатоспроможності та банкрутства (ретроспективний і порівняльно-правовий аспекти)
Get PDFThe article is devoted to problems of improving legal regulation content of economic relations in the area of insolvency and bankruptcy. The article is focused on legal relations in the area of insolvency and bankruptcy and the problem of their legal adjustment. Retrospective review is analyzed and comparative legal analysis is made after the example of developed countries.Formation of a highly civilized society on the principles of European integration in Ukraine is possible by means of reforming the basic economic and legal foundations of its life activity, where the legal regulation of insolvency and bankruptcy must be involved. For the long time of independence of the country, this issue is steadily in constant dynamic development, which is due to the diverse orientation of its consideration by various scientists, as well as changes in the normative and legislative support for its solution.A considerable number of scientific works is devoted to the problems of the formation of legal regulation of insolvency and bankruptcy relations effective model in developed countries on the basis of existent models in the scientific literature, in particular by such scholars as O. Pashaver, L. Verhovodova, K. Agaeva, V. Jun, O. Kovalenko, K. Pralichen, B. Polyakov, M. Titov and others.Substantiation of the proposal in order to determine the directions of further development of Ukrainian legislation in the area of insolvency and bankruptcyСтатья посвящена проблемам совершенствования содержания правового регулирования экономических отношений в сфере неплатежеспособности и банкротства. Особое внимание уделено правоотношениям в сфере неплатежеспособности и банкротства и проблеме их правовой регламентации. Проанализированы ретроспективный и сделан сравнительно-правовой анализ на примере стран с развитой экономикойРозглянуто проблеми вдосконалення змісту правового регулювання економічних відносин у сфері неплатоспроможності та банкрутства. Особливу увагу приділено правовідносинам у сфері неплатоспроможності й банкрутства, а також проблемі їх правової регламентації. Здійснено ретроспективний і порівняльно-правовий аналіз на прикладі країн з розвиненою економіко
Принцип поділу державної влади та система стримувань і противаг: генезис і запровадження в Україні
Get PDFThe article analyzes the historical experience of implementing the principle of separation of powers in different countries of the world for further theoretical development of the most optimal model of organization of state power of Ukraine on the basis of its division into legislative, executive and judicial branches and ensuring the effective functioning of the system of checks and balances. It has been established that this democratic principle is enshrined in Article 6 of the Constitution of Ukraine.Analyzing historical experience and trying to find the roots of the theory of separation of powers from the ancient authors, we conclude that scientists forget that for the Antiquity, the Middle Ages, and for the Renaissance, this idea was practically absent. Then it was discussed more about the division of separate functions of state power. For the first time, the question of the emergence of the theory of separation of powers in the modern sense is drawn to J. Locke in 1688. The purpose of the state, he sees in preserving the freedom and property acquired as a result of labor. Another thinker who grounded this idea was Sh. -L. Montesquieu. In his opinion, in a properly organized state, there is no single power, and there must be three independent power from each other: legislative, executive and judicial. Any association in the hands of one body inevitably leads to abuse.It was established that the theory of separation of powers was perceived by the constitutions of many countries, although the concrete forms of its implementation were very diverse. During the times of Soviet power in our country, the principle of separation of powers was rejected as alien and unacceptable and, at best, was considered as a normal division of labor, and only after the declaration of independence, this principle was clearly defined.On the basis of the foregoing, it was concluded that contemporary views on the mechanism of the principle of the division of a unified state power are reduced to the fact that in the process of organization and implementation of state power various different functions and powers are used in their designation and function in relation to independent state bodies that are mutually controlling in the course of their activities each other through a system of checks and balances es New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language: UK;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA'>abuse its constitutionally determined powers and, as a result, will infringe the Fundamental Law of Ukraine, in particular, its second section of article 19, according to which bodies of public power and their officials are obliged to act only on the grounds, within the limits of authority, and in the manner envisaged by the Constitution and the laws of Ukraine. However, the legislator is still able to prevent appearance of the above situation by necessary amendments to the Law of Ukraine «On the Constitutional Court of Ukraine»Проанализирован процесс зарождения, становления и внедрения в государственно-правовую практику принципа разделения властей и его неотъемлемой части – системы сдержек и противовесов. Раскрыто содержание принципа разделения властей и определено, что собой представляет система сдержек и противовесов. Сделан вывод о необходимости закрепления на конституционном уровне эффективной системы сдержек и противовесов, без которой невозможна практическая реализация принципа разделения властейПроаналізовано процес зародження, становлення та запровадження в державно-правову практику принципу поділу державної влади та його невід’ємного елементу – системи стримувань і противаг. Розкрито зміст принципу поділу державної влади та визначено, що собою являє система стримувань та противаг. Зроблено висновок про необхідність закріплення на конституційному рівні ефективної системи стримувань і противаг, без якої практична реалізація принципу поділу влади неможлив
Майнові права кредиторів юридичної особи, яка перебуває в процесі припинення
Get PDF The article reveals the problem of protection of the rights of creditors upon termination of a legal entity through its reorganization. Since the contractual relationship is an obligation, the property right of the creditor is the right to demand from the debtor to fulfill the property debt. In the context of the issues discussed in the article, this right has not ‘matured’ yet, that is, the creditor has not yet to make this claim. However, when a legal entity or a court makes a decision on its reorganization, creditors receive additional property rights in comparison with those that they had under the contracts entered into with the legal entity. First of all, it is the right to demand termination or acceleration of obligations, or enforcement of obligations, except in cases stipulated by law. Creditors exercise this right by applying to the Commission for the termination of a legal entity which has to make a final decision on this issue. If the creditor’s property claim was not satisfied by the commission, the obligations legal relationships of this creditor and a newly created in the process of reorganization legal entity are preserved. Meanwhile, if these relationships are, at the request of the creditor, changed by the Commission by ensuring that they are properly implemented, then the legal entity established in the process of reorganization, to which the property that is the subject of the pledge is passed by transfer act or separation balance sheet, will also be the legal successor. The legal entities created in the process of reorganization are jointly and severally liable for the debts of their predecessor, which ensures proper fulfillment of obligations.В статье исследуется проблема охраны прав кредиторов при прекращении юридического лица путем его реорганизации. Поскольку договорные отношения являются обязательством, имущественным правом кредитора становится право требовать от должника выполнения им своего имущественного долга. Созданные в процессе реорганизации юридические лица несут солидарную ответственность по долгам своего правопредшественника, чем обеспечивается надлежащее выполнение обязательств с кредиторами. Досліджено проблему охорони права кредиторів при припиненні юридичної особи шляхом її реорганізації. Оскільки договірні відносини є зобов’язанням, майновим правом кредитора є право вимоги до боржника про виконання ним свого майнового обов’язку. З прийняттям юридичною особою або судом рішення про припинення з правонаступництвом, її кредитори набувають додаткових майнових прав у порівнянні з тими, що вони мали на підставі договорів, укладених з юридичною особою
Проблеми захисту прав учасників публічних закупівель
Get PDFIn this article, the problems of protection of the rights of participants in public procurement at various stages of the tendering process is considering. Besides, the legal qualification of behavior of the key actors the judicial practice were analyzed. There were also defined “weaknesses” of the law, on the basis of which customers and participants can abuse with their rights, therefore, in order to eliminate them, we’ve made proposals to the legislation.Historically, the field of public procurement is one of the most corruptive. Experts estimate losses from corruption and insufficient competition in this sphere in the amount of at least UAH 50 billion a year. This is due to a set of factors. Firstly, employees of state-owned organizations, as usually, have no economical interest in saving money. Secondly, public procurement is a large commodity market, which in developed countries makes 10 – 15 % of GDP, and in developing countries – up to 20 % of GDP. Thirdly, corruption schemes there are relatively “simple”, the average size of which in the medical sector, according to unofficial information, is 5 – 10 % of the contract price, and sometimes it can be limited to a "gift" of stationery goods, etc.Abuse can occur at every stage of procurement and, sometimes, it is difficult to prove their illegality, due to their formal legality. It is so due to gaps in the legislation.I.At the stage of procurement planning there can be determined such abuses:1) violation in determining the subject of procurement: (1.1) excessive details of goods, services and works, establishment of specific requirements that do not result in the customer obtaining logistical or organizational advantages, but can be performed only by a limited circle of business entities; (1.2) unreasonable procurement of works, when the price of the equipment is higher than the cost of the work itself; (1.3) reference in the bidding documentation to a particular trademark, if the subject of the purchase can be described by general features (for example, the purchase of a car). An exception is the cases when the customer buys the belonging for the main thing, for example, in order to purchase a consumable material compatible with a medical product; (1.4) concealing the object of purchase by using improper symbols of classifiers, making grammatical errors, loading low-quality files; (1.5) abstract requirements for a product, work or service.2) violations related to the division of the subject of purchase on lots: (2.1) buying many of lots without a real need for them, though such approach is financially disincentive for small and medium-sized businesses; (2.2) uniting in one lot different commodity groups (for example, medicines and medical products).3) untimely changes to an annual procurement plan, due to gaps in the legislation, because there is no exact time at which plan should be approved as a deadlines for amendments.5) the main violation is a formation of tender documentation for a particular participant or products, for example: - setting the requirements that contradict the law (to provide documents which are not provided by law); - a need to submit unreasonably complex documents (disproportionally long terms or high fees when they are received, which may only be available for large enterprises).6) the requirement to submit some documents by participants in hard copy before the date of the disclosure of tender offers, regardless of the work of the electronic system.7) consolidation in a draft contract of such conditions as to discourage bona fide suppliers to participate in the tender, in particular: - overvaluation of the payment period for delivered products, for example, “until the 31.12.2017” or “payment is made within 100 days from the date of shipment of products”; - installation of complicated delivery terms by the supplier, for example, “the supplier must deliver the products at the request of the customer within 24 hours”; - disproportionately severe penalties and operational sanctions for breach of contractual obligations by the supplier. Such conditions allow the customer to apply them with a “repressive” purpose selectively to certain participants. However, such abusive rights formally meet the requirements of procurement law.Also, violations by customers and suppliers may take place at the stage of procurement or at the stage of execution of the contract.On the basis of the study were proposed the main directions of improvement of the procurement law: (1) to introduce the principle of proportionality of tender requirements to the price and complexity of the subject of procurement; (2) to reduce the thresholds of sub-procurement and to oblige customers to make public announcements on any pre-purchase; (3) to establish the dependency between the bid price and the fee for appealing the procurement procedure to the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine; (4) to approve rules for assessing the experience of performing similar contracts by participants, as well as a list of documents confirming the existence of such experience; (5) to approve sectoral standards for the preparation of tender documentation; (6) to secure a clear prohibition on the submission of any documents and information related to the procurement, in writing, before the date of disclosure of tender offersИсследованы проблемы защиты прав участников публичных закупок на разных этапах проведения тендеров, с осуществлением юридической квалификации действий, и проанализирована судебная практика. Определены «слабые места» закона, на основании которых заказчики и участники могут злоупотреблять своими правами, поэтому в целях их устранения разработаны предложения в законодательствоДосліджено проблеми захисту прав учасників публічних закупівель на різних етапах проведення тендерів зі здійсненням юридичної кваліфікації діянь та проаналізовано судову практику. Визначено «слабкі місця» закону, на підставі яких замовники та учасники можуть зловживати своїми правами, з метою їх усунення розроблено пропозиції до законодавств
Незалежність судової влади як конституційна цінність та принцип конституційного ладу України
Get PDFIn the article there is comprehensive analysis of politico-legal nature and social value of independent judiciary power as one of the main modern constitutionalism ideas, researched evolution of it social understanding and acceptance. Clarified that expected result of long historical process of science researches and philosophic-legal discussions regarding significant sense of independent judiciary existence for democratic and legal-state was common confession and formal legal assignment of that main idea in first left-wing democratic constitutions.At the same time explored that idea of judiciary independence as basic constitutional principle nowadays directly assigned only in Constitutions of France,Switzerland, in Constitutional Act of Canada and some other Constitutions. More often on the Constitutional level assigned norms which guarantees independence and inviolability of the judges (Spain,Germany,Italy,Greece, Japan etc.).In article proved that Ukraine being as a legal-state impossible without real independent and impartial judiciary, which is a guarantee of functioning other power institutes in frames of their powers stated by the Constitution and laws of Ukraine and final method of solution of any legal as of competent disputes between other power institutes. It made justified conclusion that political-legal idea of judiciary independence be due avowed values of Constitutional level, which absolute supported by Ukrainian society and found its systematic although mediocre legal-norm displaying in variety of articles in Constitution of Ukraine. According to the most importance and identified meaning of real judiciary independence for Ukraine functionality as the democracy and legal-state, for providing the rule of law and for primarily – effective human rights and freedoms protection, the judiciary independence belong to basic Constitutional principles which in total are basis for Constitutional System of Ukraine US style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language: UK;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA'>abuse its constitutionally determined powers and, as a result, will infringe the Fundamental Law of Ukraine, in particular, its second section of article 19, according to which bodies of public power and their officials are obliged to act only on the grounds, within the limits of authority, and in the manner envisaged by the Constitution and the laws of Ukraine. However, the legislator is still able to prevent appearance of the above situation by necessary amendments to the Law of Ukraine «On the Constitutional Court of Ukraine»Проанализированы политико-правовая природа и социальная ценность независимости судебной власти как один из определяющих принципов конституционного строя, выяснено его значение для развития Украины как демократического, правового государства, исследованы формы и способы его гарантирования; доказано, что несмотря на отсутствие прямого конституционного закрепления, принцип независимости судебной власти Украины воплощен в текст Основного Закона Украины опосредствовано – через другие конституционные принципы; рассмотрены проблемные аспекты обеспечения реальной независимости судебной власти на современном этапе государственно-правового развития Украины Проаналізовано політико-правову природу та соціальну цінність незалежності судової влади як одного з визначальних принципів конституційного ладу, з’ясовано його значення для розвитку України як демократичної, правової держави, досліджено форми та способи його гарантування; доведено, що незважаючи на відсутність прямого конституційного закріплення, принцип незалежності судової влади України втілено в тексті Основного Закону України опосередковано – через інші конституційні принципи; розглянуто проблемні аспекти забезпечення реальної незалежності судової влади на сучасному етапі державно-правового розвитку Україн
Саморегулівна діяльність у сфері господарювання: завдання господарсько-правового забезпечення
Get PDFThe article gives an interpretation of the concept of «self-regulation of economic activity», its legislative framework is established. The correlation of concepts of «self-regulation of economic activity» and «co-regulation of economic activity» is considered. It is proved that co-regulation and self-regulation are more flexible types of regulation of economic activity in comparison with state regulation, since they activate and involve the process itself directly by the participants of economic activity and consumers of goods and services. It is established that the investigated mechanisms have common and distinctive characteristics.The development and deepening of the functional load of self-regulatory organizations is an indisputable trend in the development of organizational and economic relations in the national economic system, and consequently the legislator's efforts must deliberately aim at modernizing the relevant legislative framework, given that the socio-economic need in this is over.It is stated that self-regulation is one of the key tools of effective regulatory policy. This is due to the disadvantages of the current state regulation system, which, in turn, leads to the fact that enterprises spend considerable resources to ensure compliance with outdated or too strict norms, while the state loses money in support of an ineffective control system that often has a repressive and negative attitude pours into the business climate. Consequently, the mechanisms of self-regulation of economic activity should receive a detailed legislative regulation, including the motives for an effective regulatory policy of the state.The legislator is faced with the task of creating the legal basis for the establishment and functioning of self-regulatory organizations, which should be separately enshrined in the Commercial Code of Ukraine in the section dedicated specifically to this issue, which should include, in particular, the legal conditions of creation and the organizational and legal form of self-regulatory organizations, the grounds and procedures for the delegation of state powers to these organizations, the abolition of this delegation, the creation of special funds, rule-making activities, etc.On the basis of the norms of the Commercial Code of Ukraine, special legislation ofUkraineon the functioning of self-regulatory organizations in various spheres of economic activity should be create.В статье дано толкование понятия «саморегулирование хозяйственной деятельности», установлены его законодательные основы. Рассмотрено соотношение понятий «саморегулирование хозяйственной деятельности» и «сорегулирование хозяйственной деятельности». Доказано, что сорегулирование и саморегулирование являются более гибкими видами регулирования хозяйственной деятельности по сравнению с государственным регулированием, ведь активизируют и приобщают к процессу непосредственно самих участников хозяйственной деятельности и потребителей товаров и услуг. Установлено, что исследуемые механизмы имеют общие и отличительные характеристики.Надано тлумачення поняття «саморегулювання господарської діяльності» та встановлено його законодавчі основи. Розглянуто співвідношення понять «саморегулювання господарської діяльності» і «співрегулювання господарської діяльності». Доведено, що співрегулювання й саморегулюваннями є більш гнучкими видами регулювання господарської діяльності порівняно з державним регулюванням, адже активізують і долучають до процесу безпосередньо самих учасників господарської діяльності й споживачів товарів і послуг. Встановлено, що досліджувані механізми мають спільні й відмінні характеристик
Межі конституційного контролю у провадженнях за конституційними поданнями та конституційними скаргами: теоретичні аспекти
Get PDFNeither the Constitution of Ukraine, nor the Law of Ukraine «On the Constitutional Court of Ukraine» contains any provisions that would empower the Constitutional Court of Ukraine to step outside a subject matter of a constitutional petition or a constitutional complaint and to assess in the aspect of conformity to the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) of other legal acts (specific provisions thereof), except those, concerning which the proceedings are instituted within the case and that have effect on delivering a decision within the case. In other words, the Constitutional Court of Ukraine is deprived of an opportunity, at its own discretion, to initiate constitutional control of other legal acts (specific provisions thereof) during the proceedings within the case upon a constitutional petition or a constitutional complaint.Therefore, absence of such legislative instrument de facto will block any attempts of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine to overstep a subject matter of constitutional control within the proceedings upon constitutional petitions and constitutional complaints if the authority of constitutional jurisdiction of Ukraine detects any signs of unconstitutionality of other legal acts (specific provisions thereof), which are in the system link with a subject matter of constitutional control and have effect on delivering the objective and just decision within the case.Moreover, in case of display of court activism (initiative) the Constitutional Court of Ukraine will inevitably abuse its constitutionally determined powers and, as a result, will infringe the Fundamental Law of Ukraine, in particular, its second section of article 19, according to which bodies of public power and their officials are obliged to act only on the grounds, within the limits of authority, and in the manner envisaged by the Constitution and the laws of Ukraine. However, the legislator is still able to prevent appearance of the above situation by necessary amendments to the Law of Ukraine «On the Constitutional Court of Ukraine»В статье поднимаются вопросы, связанные с выяснением актуальных границ полномочий Конституционного Суда Украины в производствах по конституционным представлениям и конституционным жалобам, исследованием уже недействительного законодательного механизма выхода за границы предмета конституционного контроля, изучением законодательства иностранных государств в части предоставление конституционным судам права инициировать конституционною проверку и оценкой вероятного судебного активизма Конституционного Суда Украины при отсутствии соответствующих законодательных предписанийУ статті порушено питання, пов’язані із з’ясуванням актуальних меж повноважень Конституційного Суду України у провадженнях за конституційними поданнями та конституційними скаргами, дослідженням уже нечинного законодавчого механізму виходу за межі предмета конституційного контролю, вивченням законодавства іноземних держав у частині надання конституційним судам права ініціювати конституційну перевірку та оцінку ймовірного судового активізму Конституційного Суду України за відсутності відповідних законодавчих приписі
Принципи господарського права у Господарському кодексі України
Get PDFProblem setting. The question of the principles of law is very actual in today's conditions because of their functional tasks.The state of modern economic legislation is not perfect. The principles of law become increasingly impotent at this time, as the guiding, fundamental principles that determine the essence and content of law, based on the moral, political and economic values of society. The principles of law simultaneously establish the content and direction of law-making and law enforcement process.Despite the great importance of the principles of law for the process of legal regulation, unfortunately, the topic of the principles of commercial law is not sufficiently investigated today, and this effective legal instrument is using not enough for regulating public relations.There is no common approach to the definition of the content and classification of the principles of commercial law, and the Commercial Code of Ukraine contains Art. 5 "Constitutional Principles of Law Enforcement in the Sphere of Management", Art. 6 «General principles of management», Art. 44 "Principles of entrepreneurial activity", but has no article defining the principles of commercial law.Recent research and publications analysis. Scientific-theoretical base of research are the works of such famous scientists: S. S. Alekseev, G. L. Znamenskiy, A. M. Kolodiy, V. K. Mamutov, S. P. Pohrebnyak, O. O. Uvarova, M. V. Tsvik, V. S. Shcherbina and etc.Paper objective. The purpose of the article is an attempt to highlight the contemporary content of the issues of the principles of commercial law and their legislative consolidation in order to improve and rectify existing deficiencies in order to give them effectiveness and practical value.Paper main body. Principles of law, as the most effective legal means, should be used by the legislator as much as possible. Each codified act must contain the basic provisions in which the basic principles of legal regulation or principles, which are "rules of the game" for all the participants of the legal relationship falling within the scope of its regulation, must be determined. The established rules should be binding on the legislator, who adopts regulations that must comply with the established principles of law, and for law enforcement officials.Despite the actuality and effectiveness of the principles of law in the Commercial Code of Ukraine there are no rules on the principles of commercial law, and certain principles contained in separate articles of the code are not effective because of the lack of legal techniques for setting out them.The general provisions of the sectoral code contain Art. 5 "Constitutional Principles of Law Enforcement in the Sphere of Management", Art. 6 «General principles of management», the analysis of which is seen as follows.All provisions of Article 5 of the Commercial Code of Ukraine (with the exception of the rule of the optimal combination of market self-regulation of economic relations of economic entities and state regulation of macroeconomic processes) completely duplicate the norms of the Constitution of Ukraine, which, by virtue of Part 3 of Art. 8 of the Main Law, have the highest force of law and therefore directly applicable and do not require to reintroducing them to other normative legal acts for giving them effectivenessContents of Art. 6 of the Commercial Code of Ukraine partially coincides with the norms of the Constitution of Ukraine and Article 5 of the Economic Code of Ukraine. The legal technique that is used in the implementation of the principle of freedom of entrepreneurship is flawed and restricts the rights, which are guaranteed by the Constitution of Ukraine, that is inadmissible. The legal technique of the implementation of the principle of limiting state regulation of economic processes and the principle of the prohibition of unlawful interference of government bodies and local self-government bodies, their officials in economic relationships is imperfect also.Conclusions of the research. All of the foregoing gives grounds for concluding that:1. The economic code of Ukraine in the part of defining the bases of law and order in the sphere of economic activity and principles of management, contains provisions that are simple duplication of the norms of the Constitution of Ukraine, that are in majority cases are only useless, but sometimes this provisions even are contradictory to the Constitution of Ukraine due to the imperfection of legal technique their implementation. There are the lot of unnecessary repeats in the economic code of Ukraine itself.2. All these disadvantages exist at a time when, the basically codified act of the branch of economic law does not contain an article about the principles of economic law, which should be the basis for determining the direction of legal regulation of economic relations, for giving an opportunity to resolve legal conflicts and fill gaps in economic law, for interpretations of legal norms and establishing standards, values and guidelines for the participants in economic relations.3. The problem of principles of economic law seems to be an independent and especially actual object of economic and legal research, and therefore requires special complex scientific researches in order to make the principles of economic law a real instrument of economic and legal regulation in conditions of the extraordinary dynamics of development of economic legislation and the existence of luge numbers of conflicts of law. Short Abstract for an article ОAbstracts: The article is devoted to the analysis and research of the problem of the principles of economic law and their legislative consolidation with the aim of improving and correcting the existing shortcomings for giving the principles of economic law a practical value. The article gives a detailed analysis of article 5 and article 6 of the Commercial Code of Ukraine.Статья посвящена анализу и исследованию проблемы принципов хозяйственного права и их законодательного закрепления с целью усовершенствования и исправления существующих недостатков для наделения принципов хозяйственного права практическим значением. Сделан содержательный анализ статей 5 и 6 Хозяйственного кодекса УкраиныРозглянуто проблеми законодавчого закріплення принципів господарського права на рівні основного галузевого акта – Господарського кодексу України та проаналізовано його статті 5 і