Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya: Open Journal Systems
Not a member yet
807 research outputs found
Sort by
Kewenangan Notaris Membuat Akta Yang Berkaitan Dengan Pertanahan Menurut Pasal 15 Ayat (2) Huruf (F) Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris
No full textAbstract : That the formulation of clause 15 verse (12) point (0 statute number 30 in 2004 about notarist occupation which states that notarist has an authority to issue the official documents related to the land affairs, practically it can cause the difference in interpratation. At glance, the statement itself can create the assumption that notarist occupies the authority of PPAT in issuing land official document (akta PPAT).Having done the analysis of juridical-normative, furthermore, it is done by the statute approach as well as the law history and sistematical interpretation, with legal materials of primary and secondary so that this study obtains that:The authority of notarist as stated in the clause 15 verse (2) point (f) statute number 30 in 2004 must be interpreted narrowly, it means that notarist does not occupy the authority of PPAT in issuing the land official documents and there is no conflict of authority between the authority of notarist and PPAT that they are different each other either seeing from historical aspect, law background, or the scope of its job. The formulation is formulated by the statute makers in order to anticipate a very quick development in economy and business so that it is expected to be able to accept any kinds of economic and business activities in community that do law action or the agreement related to land affairs;The interpretation of notarist authority that issues the official documents related to land affairs that belongs to the authority of PPAT until now. The authority of notarist in issuing land official documents is the authority that is described as follows: the notarist official document is the official document that contains with law affairs stated in the agreement which is obligatory, that its object related to land affairs, nevertheless, the concerned law affairs is not aimed to shift the right of land ownership or to burden the right of land ownership, for instance the official document of rent-lease agreement or the land official document of borrow-use agreement;According to the findings above, this study concludes that the authority of notarist in issuing official document related to land affairs is not the authority of issuing land official document that belongs to PPAT business, and the authority of notarist is done as long as the official document that they make has no tendency to shift the right of land ownership or to burden the right of land ownership. At last, this study suggests that : (a) in order to make the interpretation to the clause 15 verse (2) point (f) statute number 30 in 2004 is implemented by law history interpretation and systemic interpretation, (b) in order to make the authority of PRAT increases its law basis to be statute, and (c) it is expected to all intergrated relationship to conduct thesocialization and coordination in order that the conflict of authority does not occur between notarist and PPAT when they work. (keywords: The Authority, Official Document, Land
TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM NOTARIS TERHADAP PEMBUATAN AKTA PERJANJIAN NOMINEE SAHAM
No full textThe making of the deed of Covenant nominee of shares may cause harm to the parties as a result of the Treaty of nominee shares annulled by law so that it will bring a notary into the legal responsibility and can are sanctions in the civil code, namely in the form of reimbursement of the costs, damages and interest. Criminal sanctions, namely when the existence of fraud or trickery that is sourced from a notary itself, and criminal sanctions may be provided with a review of whether the notary meets the entire contents of the outline of the crime. In addition, by implementing a manufacturing certificate stock nominee agreement then the notary has been doing against the law and may be subject to administrative sanctions, namely in the form of an oral reprimand, written reprimand, suspension, dismissal with respect and stop with disrespect. As well as violating the code of ethics the notary public so it can be charged penalties in the form of a reprimand, warning, suspension of the membership of the Assembly, the Assembly from the membership of the dismissal, and dismissal with no respect from the membership of the Assembly
BERAKHIRNYA HAK GUNA BANGUNAN YANG MASIH MENJADI JAMINAN KREDIT DDENGAN HAK TANGGUNGAN
No full textIn the credit required a guarantee for the debt repayment and the Bank is one of the distributor of funds in the form of credit. Guarantee of debt repayment is usually in the form of certificate of land right. One is the land right is certificate of buildings right that have validity period. Expiration of buildings rights that were pledged as collateral for loans with mortgage would have the legal consequence of the existence of a security interest. In Article 18, paragraph 1, letter d Act Mortgage one of which led to the mortgage abolition is the abolishment of land rights. In this research the authors uses the normative research approach based on legislation and conceptual approaches. Data collection techniques with library materials and interviews and also the techniques conclusion with the deductive method. Results of research on the problems that the expiry of building rights as the object of credit guarantees stipulated in Law Number 4 of 1996 on the rights of dependents, the Indonesian Government Regulation Number 40 of 1996 on the right to cultivate (Mortgage), building rights and rights of use, the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian / Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 1998 on changes to building rights or the right to use the land burdened residential security rights into property rights and the legal arrangements for the termination of the buildings right is still the object of credit guarantees in the form of Mortgage while the Credit Agreement is not over yet set in the legislation, background Bank provides loans with building rights as the object of loan collateral that are from yuridical and business considerations, the law efforts that can be done of creditors as the holder of a security interest if the right to build an end that is making the promises in the Deed Granting Mortgage, requesting additional collateral, extension of rights, the right change and renewal of building rights. Keywords : Guarantee, Building Rights, Mortgag
Eksistensi Perum Jaminan Kredit Indonesia (Jamkrindo) Sebagai Penjamin Kredit Bagi Usaha Kecil dan Menengah di Kota Palembang
Get PDFMasalah mendasar usaha kecil menengah yang paling menonjol menyangkut menyediakan pembiayaan usaha atau modal usaha. Kebutuhan modal sangat terasa pada saat seseorang ingin memulai usaha baru. Biasanya bila motivasinya kuat, seseorang akan tetap memulai usaha kecil tetapi dengan modal seadanya. Pelaku usaha Kecil dan Menengah (UKM) dalam pelaksanaannya memerlukan modal, namun tidak semua pelaku usaha dapat menyediakan modal secara menyeluruh, sehingga diperlukan peminjaman pada bank dalam bentuk kredit. Dalam melakukan peminjaman pihak bank memerlukan jaminan berupa harta kekayaan debitur dengan nominal yang sesuai dengan besar pinjaman. Namun tidak semua debitur dapat menyediakan jaminan yang sesuai dengan nominal peminjaman sehingga debitur membutuhkan bantuan dari perusahaan penjaminan sebagai pihak ketiga. Perum Jamkrindo sebagai salah satu perusahaan penjaminan yang merupakan Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) dan mengambil fokus bisnis penjaminan kredit pada Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM). Eksistensi Perum Jamkrindo Cabang Palembang sebagai penjamin kredit bagi UKM di Kota Palembang terus ditingkatkan. Upaya ini dilakukan agar UKM di Kota Palembang mampu tumbuh dan berkembang dalam persaingan dunia usaha sehingga dapat meningkatkan perekonomian di Kota Palembang
KEWENANGAN NOTARIS SEBAGAI PEJABAT LELANG KELAS II BERDASARKAN PERATURAN MENTERI KEUANGAN NOMOR 93/PMK.06/2010 TENTANG PETUNJUK PELAKSANAAN LELANG
No full textAbstract : A Notary is a Public Official which is authorized to make authentic deeds by the Notary Occupation Act.A Notary can double as a Land Deed Officer (PPAT) which is authorized to make authentic deeds regarding certain legal actions on the land right. The PPAT’s authority is to make the Transfer of Right deed, the Imposition of Right deed such as the Power of Attorney’s Mortgage Right Imposing (SKMHT), and the imposition of Mortgage Right Deed (APHT) in a Credit Agreement between a Debtor and creditors (in this case Banks or Non-Bank Financing Institutions). A Notary can also double as a Second Class Auction Officer (hereinafter referred to as a Notary PL-2) all at once making a minutes of auction deed as it is stipulated in UUJN Article 15 Paragraph (2) Point g. First class auction officer is a special position which is given by the Ministry of Finance cq. Directorate General of State Finance cq. Service Office of State Property and Auction. An Auction or a Public Sales is an open to public sales of goods at a increased or a decreased written and/or oral price quote in order to achieve the highest price and was preceded by the auction’s announcement. The First Class and Second class Auction Officer’s authority is regulated in the Finance Minister’s Regulation (PMK) Number 93/PMK.06/2010 regarding the Implementation Guideline for auction, where there are three classifications on auction, which are the execution auction, the mandatory non-execution auction and the voluntary non-execution auction. Within the mandatory execution auction there is the Execution auction Article 6 of the Mortgage Right Law (UUHT) classification. However, the UUHT auction authority should only be held by a First Class Auction officer from the Ministry of Finance. Notary PL-2 is not given the authority over the UUHT execution auction, eventhough the notary as the PPAT also gave the birth of the Mortgage right on the mortgage right burdened land right certificate and issued the mortgage right certificate (SHT). Certificate are the two formal requirements that ougth to be met by creditors in the implementation petition of the Article 6 UUHT execution auction. Keywords: second class auction Officer, Auction, Notar
Pola Koalisi Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensial Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945
Get PDFStruktur politik dan ketatanegaraan Indonesia mengalami perubahan yang sangat mendasar pasca amandemen UUD 1945. Salah satunya adalah pemurnian sistem pemerintahan presidensial Indonesia yang telah disepakati oleh Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat (MPR). Sistem pemerintahan presidensial sebetulnya tidak mengenal adanya koalisi. Koalisi lazimnya dipraktekkan dalam sistem pemerintahan parlementer. Akan tetapi dalam kondisi sistem pemerintahan presidensial Indonesia yang multipartai, koalisi merupakan suatu “keharusan†demi keberlangsungan pemerintahan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan bagaimana pola koalisi dalam sistem pemerintahan presidensial Indonesia pasca amandemen UUD 1945 khususnya amandemen ketiga. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menelusuri bahan-bahan pustaka dan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berhubungan dengan penelitian. Setelah dianalisis maka diketahui bahwa pola koalisi yang terjadi di Indonesia selama tiga periode pemerintahan pasca amandemen ketiga UUD 1945, didapati pola koalisi yang sedikit berbeda. Akan tetapi dari ketiga pola koalisi tersebut dapat ditarik kesamaan bahwa pola koalisi dalam sistem pemerintahan Indonesia cenderung mudah rapuh dan terpecah belah serta memerlukan kompromi antara berbagai pihak, antara lain eksekutif, legislatif, dan partai politik. Untuk itulah seharusnya ada pengaturan yang jelas mengenai koalisi dalam sistem pemerintahan presidensial Indonesia ini agar tidak mudah terpecah belah demi pemerintahan yang efektif, efisien, dan stabil
KEDUDUKAN DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM PIHAK SUB KONTRAKTOR PADA PERJANJIAN PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH
No full textAbstract: "Legal Status and Responsibilities of Sub Contractors Party on the Agreement Procurement of Government Goods / Services" analyze legal problems /issues namely, the Law considerations of the main contractors and sub-contractors to make sub contract procurement of goods / services of the government, the legal relationship between sub-contractors and main contractors with the government, the legal responsibilities of the sub-contractors in getting the default by the sub-contractor, the sub contractor procurement of government goods / services is not made as notarized ,there are differences in the regulation of sub-contract in Article 87 paragraph (3) of Presidential Regulation No. 70 of 2012 prohibited while Article 24 paragraph (1) of Law The Act No. 18 year 1999 on Construction Services allow for the sub contract. The theory framework in this study consisted of Grand Theory: Theory of Equitable Legal Certainty, legal liability theory. Middle Range Theory: Theory of Public Contracts Characteristically (Publiekrechtelijk overeenkomst), the theory as a Notary Public Officials. Applied Theory: Principles consensual, the freedom to make contracts, strength of binding contracts, goodwill, balance, habits, indemnities, timeliness, force majeure, dispute resolution, the principle of the goods / services of the government. The Research methods using type hermeneutic research paradigm. The research approach using Normative Approach, Statue approach, legal Philosophy approach, conceptual approach, legal Historical approach, Sociolegal approach.. The technique of taking conclusions with Deductive method so that it is concluded that the legal considerations around contractors and sub contractors to make sub contract In Clause of Article 8 paragraph (1) in agreement with the main contractor the goods / services of the government, and special expertise for achievement, and the non-legal considerations is cost efficiency. Judgements are binding relationship and The Legal Responsibilities to the main contractor and sub-contractors only, not to the government. It is suggested the agreement the sub-contract made as notarized by a notary public official authorized to guarantee legal certainty and fairness to the parties, so as not to violate Article 87 paragraph (3) Presidential Regulation No. 70 Year 2012 on Procurement of Government Goods/Services that the Deed made is the Partnership Act Consortium Agreement for Joint Operation (KSO) is set out in Chapter III Instruction to Participants Procurement (IKPP) in the Annex to Regulation Agency Chief Procurement Policy/government Services No. 6 of 2012 on the Technical Guidelines Presidential Regulation No. 70 Year 2012 on Procurement of Government Goods/Services. Keywords: Legal Status , Legal Responsibilities,Sub Contract, Procurement of Government Goods / Service
PEMBAGIAN HARTA WARIS MENURUT HUKUM ADAT DAN HUKUM ISLAM DI KECAMATAN CEMPAKA KABUPATEN OKU TIMUR
No full textIn terms of kinship, people in Cempaka East OKU District generally base family lineage from men side (father), or Patrilineal. The main problems in this thesis are: how is the distribution of inheritance under customary law and islamic law in Cempaka Sub-district, East OKU district? Anf how is the application of Islamic Law on the distribution of customary inheritance in Cempaka Sub-district, East OKU District? This thesis is a sociological /empirical law research. Inthis study it is examined how the system of the distribution of inheritance is applied or implemented in Cempaka sub-district, East OKU district, and what the role of Islamic Law on the distribution is. The data collection method is through documentation study, direct data collection by giving structured questionnaires and conducting interviews with respondents.Based on data processing, this study can be concluded as follows:1) The distribution of inheritance in Cempaka sub-district East OKU district has been done by following procedures of Komering family, which is applicable customary law in Cempaka sub-district, in which successor system is mostly used, where all properties of the parents (heir) will become the inheritance. The inheritance has been forwarded or distributed to the heir’s children. Some other Komering people in Cempaka sub-district divide the inheritance if the owner has already passed away. Customary inheritance law in Cempaka sub-district East OKU district still exists and is still in use even if the procedure is unsure, however it is still in compliance to customs rules although it almost changes. The position of traditional leaders or customary leaders in the distribution of inheritance has almost no function, because people believe that inheritance distribution issue is not their expertise. Most people in Cempaka sub-district East OKU district have already known that inheritance is also a part of religiousissues, namely Islam, so inheritance distribution issue is a religious issue. This means it falls under Islamic Law. Based on that statement, majority of Cempaka sub-district people already implemented the distribution of inheritance based on Islamic Law, though it is not yet entirely according to Al Qur’an and Al Hadits.2) The implementation of Islamic Law in the distribution of inheritance according to Islamic Law in Cempaka sub-district has gradually taken place,, and slowly but surely Al Qur’an and Al Hadits guidance in the distribution of inheritance will be done well and will always be a reference
KEWENANGAN PERADILAN MENGADILI TERHADAP SENGKETA AKTA PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH DAN BALIK NAMA PADA SERTIPIKAT BERDASARKAN HIBAH HAK ATAS TANAH YANG CACAT HUKUM
No full textAbstract : The Background of the writing is the result of Palembang District Court No.62/PDT.G/2010/PN PLG juncto High Court verdict Palembang 101/PDT/2011/PT.PLG Number, Object lawsuit is Grant Deed No. 623/2009 dated July 30, 2009 which made before a Land Deed Official TA, SH. The decision of the judges in a lawsuit in state court can not be accepted and the decision of the judge also rejected the appeal in its entirety , a lawsuit can not be accepted because of the competence of courts to sue the Land Deed Officer and Head of the Land Office should at the State Administrative Court is not in Judicial Affairs , while the Grant Deed to cancel Judicial Affairs is the authority for Deed Land Deed Official beschikking not the result of a decision , but based on the wishes of the parties ( Partij acte ) contractual and to cancel the certificate that has been turned over the name of the authority of the State Administrative Court . Legal sanctions for Land Deed Official TA , SH which has made the Deed of Grant No. 623/2009 dated July 30, 2009 which can be legally flawed administrative sanctions and dismissal with no respect from his post by the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia , after a court ruling have permanent legal force . While the legal sanctions for the Head of the Land Office had registered under the name of the Certificate of Property No. 910/24 downstream Village by the Deed of Grant No. 623/2009 which is a legal disability for severe disciplinary offense which is the Head of the Land Office for Civil Servants, the sanction under Article 7 figure 4 Government Regulation No. 53 of 2010 Concerning Civil Service Discipline, demotion level may be lower for 3 (three) years, in order to decrease the transfer of lower level positions, exemption from office, dismissal with respect not by his own request as Employee Civil, and dismissal with no respect as a civil servant. Keywords: the Judicial Authority of judging, registration of transfer of rights of Evidence, Sanctions Law Land Deed Officer and Head of the Land Offic
PENERAPAN PASAL 5 AYAT (3) PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 37 TAHUN 1998 TENTANG PERATURAN JABATAN PPAT, KEPALA DESA SEBAGAI PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH SEMENTARA (PPAT SEMENTARA) DI KABUPATEN BANYUASIN
No full textArticle 5 section 3 of Government regulation No 37/1998 about land certificate officer (PPAT) asserts that head of district has the authority to serve the society in establishing PPAT certificate in an area with less PPAT availability.Legal materials of this research will be taken from law regulation and research result which are interview and written data from participants. This research will use Statue Law Approach that examine the legal issues relate to Agrarian law No 5/1960, district law no 6/2014, government regulation no 37/1998 about PPAT position regulation, government regulation no 24/1997 about land registration, Ministry of Agrarian, Department of National Land Affairs no 1/1996 about PPAT formation, and Department of National Land Affairs regulation no 1/2006 about carrying out stipulation of the government regulation no 37/1998 about PPAT position regulation. Case study approach is needed to answer the problem of head of village as temporary PPAT in relation to land right diversion in Banyuasin distric