LARC Cardoso Law (Yeshida Univ)
Not a member yet
9951 research outputs found
Sort by
Milbank and Cardozo’s Perlmutter Center Announce Partnership to Advance Criminal Justice Reform
Get PDFMilbank pledges $1M to establish the Milbank Exoneration and Resentencing Review Unit at the Perlmutter Center for Legal Justice at Cardozo Lawhttps://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/cardozo-news-2024/1004/thumbnail.jp
Cardozo Law News Brief: February 16, 2024
Get PDFFeatured Faculty: Rebecca Ingber Edward Zelinsky
Campus News: Milbank and Cardozo’s Perlmutter Center Announce Partnership to Advance Criminal Justice Reform Professor Rebecca Ingber Appointed to Venice Commission Dr. Richard Haass to Receive 23rd International Advocate for Peace Award
Events: The 2024 Cardozo Colloquium on Global and Constitutional Theory Cardozo Law Review Symposium on Ethics in the Judiciary and the Legal Profession: Are We in Crisis
Fall 2024 Cardozo Law Clinics Information Events
Get PDFMonday, February 26Field Clinics, Practicums and Externship Program Info Session Live Virtual Session 12:00-1:15 pm | Viewing Room 206
Wednesday, February 28 In-House Clinics and Pro Bono Scholars Info Session In-Person Session 12:00-1:15 pm | Moot
Monday, March 4 Tabling Event - In-House Clinics, Field Clinics, Practicum courses, Pro Bono Scholars Program and Externship Program Student Ambassadors staff tables and answer questions about their clinical experiences In-Person Session 12:00-1:30 pm | Third Floor Loungehttps://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/event-invitations-2024/1008/thumbnail.jp
Crypto and Arbitration: The Perfect Pair
Get PDFWhile Cryptocurrency was once seen as the forefront of unique new investment opportunities, early 2022, known as the “Crypto Winter” saw a steep decline in cryptocurrency prices.[1] The fall of cryptocurrency led to an increase in crypto arbitration, with some cases just starting to reach the court system.[2] Due to the international nature of cryptocurrency and the unique challenges disputes present, many crypto businesses include arbitration clauses in their contracts.[3] While not yet clear how many of these issues will ultimately be resolved, there are clear benefits for crypto companies using arbitration as their chosen dispute resolution process, and certain issues that must be addressed. Lawyers must remain aware of these issues when approaching crypto arbitration.
This post was originally published on the Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution website on February 14, 2024. The original post can be accessed via the Archived Link button above
Critique of Comparative Law: To \u3ci\u3eCompierre\u3c/i\u3e
Get PDFGoodrich reviews Negative Comparative Law: A Strong Programme for Weak Thought By Pierre Legrand, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022,352 pp., £95.0
Panel III: Weaponized Law of Rule of Law? Using the Courts to Address Unlawful Conduction by Political Opponents
No full textDownstreaming
Get PDFSpotify and its competitors all offer the same product at the same price. Why? Scholars have argued that relationships can be designed in a way that naturally promotes innovation. By “braiding” certain formal contracting practices with informal enforcement norms, parties develop a frame-work that supports trust and positive, long-term collaboration. This Article takes on this consensus and shows that not all braiding is good. Using the multibillion-dollar subscription music streaming business as an illustration, it demonstrates just how industry forces can, and do, overcome braiding’s positive slant. In that industry, the major record labels (Universal, Warner, and Sony) weaponize braiding to control their downstream distributors: Spotify and the Big Tech companies. Parallel contracting practices are interwoven with informal industry norms that, taken together, create a homogenous market and prohibit startup entry. Innovation is stifled as a result. Policymakers frequently look to copyright and antitrust law to promote consumer choice in content industries, and there are some viable choices in those arenas. But this Article also sets out other valuable tools that can solve these sorts of issues, disincentivize parallel practices, increase choice for consumers, and encourage market entry by technology startups
New Study Shows Legal Research Platform AI Tools Do, In Fact, Hallucinate
Get PDFFor better or worse, artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping the legal landscape. But a recent study highlights a critical issue: AI’s tendency to “hallucinate,” or generate false information. This problem raises significant concerns about the reliability of AI in legal practice
Tennessee Legislature Declares that the Human Voice Will Remain ‘The King’ in Nashville
Get PDFLast month, Tennessee broke legal ground by passing the Ensuring Likeness Voice and Image Security, or “ELVIS,” Act. This law amends the state’s existing publicity laws to include protections for an individual’s voice in general as well as specifically against artificial intelligence (AI) impersonation. The statute defines a voice as “a sound in a medium that is readily identifiable and attributable to a particular individual, regardless of whether the sound contains the actual voice or a simulation of the voice of the individual.” This standard shows a statutory expansion of legal protections for voices that blossomed with major cases in the Ninth Circuit involving Bette Midler and Tom Waits.
This post was originally published on the Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal website on April 26, 2024. The original post can be accessed via the Archived Link button above