Copenhagen Business School: CBS Open Journals
Not a member yet
5556 research outputs found
Sort by
Fem korte om studieteknik – én app bliver til fem
Get PDFPÅ KEA Bibliotek har vi udviklet en app, der imødekommer et stigende behov for studietekniske kompetencer, og guider de studerende gennem alt fra tidsstyring til notetekni
Human Rights and the 1980 U.S. Presidential Election
Get PDFDue to dramatic developments in international affairs and the starkly diverging foreign policy visions of the two candidates, Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, foreign policy occupied a usually prominent role in the 1980 U.S. presidential election. A central component of the foreign policy debate was the appropriate role for human rights concerns in American foreign relations. Nevertheless, neither historians of U.S. presidential elections nor historians of human rights have devoted much attention to the issue. This article represents the first comprehensive study of the role of human rights in the 1980 U.S. presidential election. First, it examines the role of human rights in the foreign policy visions of the presidential candidates, focusing especially on Reagan’s criticism of Carter’s human rights policy. Second, it assesses the impact the issue of human rights had on the 1980 election and the way the 1980 election shaped the role of human rights in U.S. foreign policy
Delegitimization and US presidential electoral campaigns, 1896-1980
Get PDFThe essay focuses on delegitimization of one’s political opponent as a discursive strategy in US political elections from 1896 to 1980. Starting with a definition of delegitimization as a means of contesting the legitimacy of the opponent’s aspiration to power by turning him/her into an enemy outside the constitutional perimeter, the author highlights the circumstances that conduced to political delegitimization tactics in US presidential campaigns, as well as the stock themes in use over the various periods
Commonality as the place of urban nature: Methodological approaches to familiar engagement in urban green communities
No full textMed afsæt i den pragmatiske sociolog Laurent Thévenots begreb om »familiært engagement« præsenterer artiklen tre forskellige metodologiske tilgangetil bynatur som konkrete steder for det, vi kalder »fælleshed«. Hvor begrebet om familiært engagement i sig selv kan minde om »stedstilknytning« if.eks. psykologisk og geografisk litteratur, har teorien som sådan den fordel, at den kobler individuelle engagementer med et relateret begreb om socialkoordinering i form af »fællesheder«. Dermed giver den mulighed for at udpege det familiære engagements mulige samspil med andre former for engagement i byens grønne steder, navnlig et funktionelt engagement i planer og et offentligt engagement i retfærdiggørelse, indeholdt i den samme analytiske model. Spørgsmålet, som her belyses fra forskellige metodiske vinkler, er altså, hvilke former for relationer der findes mellem familiært engagement og fælleshed i bynaturens steder, og andre former for engagement og fælleshed (funktionelt, offentligt). Metodepluralismen over de tre studier resulterer i en generel pointe om forholdet mellem familiært, funktionelt og offentligt engagement i bynatur, og at man tager højde for de mange forskellige mulige sammensætninger af stedsrelationer og ikke søger at reducere disse til ét simpelt fænomen.This article presents three methodological approaches to the study of urban nature as a location for what we call »commonality«, an idea which is basedon the concept of »familiar engagement« from the pragmatic sociology of Laurant Thevenot. Whereas the concept of familiar engagement itself bearsresemblance to »place attachment« as used in, for example, psychology and geography, our broader theoretical approach has the advantage of couplingindividual engagement with the concept of social coordination in the form of commonality. Thus, the approach draws analytical attention to the potentialinterplay between familiar engagements and other forms of engagement in the city’s green places, namely functional engagements in plans and publicengagements in justification. The analytical question, approached from three methodological angles, is what types of relationships exist between familiarengagement and commonality in urban nature, and the other forms of engagements and commonality (plan, justification). The methodological pluralismof the paper results in a general claim about the relationship between familiar, functional and justifiable engagement in urban nature, and that futureresearch should take into account the many possible compositions of placeattachments, and not reduce these to one simple phenomena
Biopower, Governmentality, Liberalism and the Genealogy of the Modern Subject : Michel Foucault’s Lectures at the Collège de France 1978-1980: Security, Territory, Population; The Birth of Biopolitics; On the Government of the Living
Get PDFWe are very pleased to guest edit and publish this special edition of Foucault Studies entitled Michel Foucault’s Lectures at the Collège de France 1978-1980. Security, Territory, Population; The Birth of Biopolitics; On the Government of the Living. As pronounced in the editorial, this special edition contains three articles, each devoted to discussing one yearly series of Foucault’s lectures at the Collège de France in the period ranging from 1977 to 1980