PsychArchives (ZPID Leibniz-Zentrum für Psychologische Information und Dokumentation)
Not a member yet
20791 research outputs found
Sort by
Code for: Advancing Transparency and Reproducibility: Criteria for Documenting Research Synthesis Processes and Data
No full textThis study addresses the adaptation of research synthesis standards in social, educational, and psychological sciences. It emphasizes the need for comprehensive documentation and adherence to reporting guidelines and FAIR principles to ensure transparency, reproducibility, and data reuse. Existing guidelines like PRISMA and FAIR guide documentation but lack specifics on making methodological data accessible. The study aims to develop a set of criteria to document review processes and data, enhancing reproducibility in psychology and education. Using a sample of 100 systematic reviews within these disciplines, it evaluates the adherence to these criteria. The results will reveal the extent of documentation rigor, identify missing elements, and inform recommendations for improving research synthesis documentation. The study's findings will contribute to standardizing synthesis documentation, promoting transparency and collaboration in the scientific community.unknownunknow
Responsibilization and delegitimization of young people's climate action in traditional and digital media messages
No full textThis essay explores the discursive responsibilization of young people for mitigating climate change, alongside the delegitimization of youth environmental activism as observed in both traditional and digital media. It also considers the potential consequences of such responsibilization for young people’s mental health and well-being. The analysis begins by examining the individualization of responsibility in the context of climate injustice—highlighting the unequal distribution of both the burden of mitigation and vulnerability to climate impacts across individuals, groups, and societies, shaped by intersecting identities such as age, class, race, and gender. Drawing on feminist concepts of wilfulness and 'weak resistance,' we apply these ideas to analyze discursive practices by and about young climate activists. We identify two distinct media responses to the everyday resistance and participation of young people, such as those involved in the School Strike for Climate. Brutal delegitimization (discursive violence) portrays young activists as lacking rationality, moral authority, and subjectivity, while soft delegitimization (discursive questioning) frames their actions as flawed and in need of adult guidance. Ultimately, we interpret the intersection of responsibilization and delegitimization as an oppressive double bind that shapes the affective atmosphere surrounding youth mental health. The essay concludes with a reflection on the justice and inclusivity of current conceptualizations of climate anxiety.notReviewedothe
KLARpsy-Text: Wie viele Menschen leiden im Globalen Süden nach Naturkatastrophen an einem Trauma, einer Depression oder Angststörung?
No full textKLARpsy-Texte sind kurze, lai:innengerechte, allgemeinverständliche und richtlinienbasierte Zusammenfassungen psychologischer Übersichtsarbeiten. Dieser KLARpsy-Text hat den Titel “Wie viele Menschen leiden im Globalen Süden nach Naturkatastrophen an einem Trauma, einer Depression oder Angststörung?”. Er wurde von Mitarbeitenden des Leibniz-Instituts für Psychologie verfasst. Als testlesende Person war Corinna beteiligt. Der KLARpsy-Text befasst sich mit folgenden Inhalten: Naturkatastrophen nehmen durch den Klimawandel zu. Sie treffen vor allem ärmere Länder des Globalen Südens. Hierzu zählen wirtschaftlich und politisch benachteiligte Länder in Asien, Afrika und Südamerika, also Schwellen- und Entwicklungsländer. Trotzdem untersuchen die meisten Studien psychische Folgen von Naturkatastrophen in reicheren Ländern. Mit ihrer Übersichtsarbeit wollten die Forschenden herausfinden: 1. Wie viele Menschen sind im Globalen Süden nach Naturkatastrophen von psychischen Störungen betroffen? 2. Welche Umstände verringern oder erhöhen das Risiko, nach einer Naturkatastrophe von einer psychischen Störung betroffen zu sein? Mehr als jeder vierte Mensch im Globalen Süden leidet nach einer Naturkatastrophe an einer Traumastörung. An einer Depression leidet nach einer Naturkatastrophe mehr als jeder fünfte Mensch und an einer generalisierten Angststörung etwa jeder sechste.https://klarpsy.de/hintergrundunknownunknow
Diagnostische Kompetenz trifft Inklusion? Zusammenhänge zwischen Wissen und Einstellung bei Lehrpersonen
No full textDiagnostische Kompetenz gilt als zentrale Voraussetzung professionellen Lehrerhandelns und als Schlüssel für gelingende inklusive Bildung. In der vorliegenden Studie wurde untersucht, inwiefern diagnostisches Wissen mit Einstellungen zu Diagnostik und zu Inklusion bei Lehrkräften zusammenhängt. Grundlage bilden das Kompetenzmodell diagnostischer Kompetenz (Herppich et al., 2018) sowie sozial-kognitive Ansätze wie die Theory of Planned Behavior (Ajzen, 1991). An einer Stichprobe von N = 102 Lehrkräften verschiedener Schulformen in Deutschland wurden diagnostisches Wissen (ESBW-Kurzform), Einstellungen zur Diagnostik (EiDiLe; Gottlebe et al., 2025) und Einstellungen zu Inklusion (EFI-L; Seifried & Heyl, 2016) erhoben. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die allgemeine Einstellung zur Diagnostik nicht signifikant mit Wissen zusammenhängt. Eine schwach positive Korrelation ergab sich jedoch für die Subskala Qualität & Fairness (r = .22, p < .05), was auf einen Zusammenhang zwischen höherem Wissen und einer stärkeren Orientierung an Gütekriterien hinweist. Überraschend zeigte sich zudem ein deutlicher positiver Zusammenhang zwischen Wissen und Inklusionseinstellung (r = .40, p < .01). Lehrkräfte mit höherem diagnostischem Wissen bewerten Inklusion insgesamt positiver. Die Befunde verdeutlichen, dass Wissen und dispositionale Orientierungen eng miteinander verknüpft sind und in Professionalisierungsprozessen gemeinsam adressiert werden sollten.unknownpublishedVersio
Test development Observing Parent-Child Interaction Inventory OPCII-1.0
No full textCurrent observational measures of parent-child interaction often lack factorial validity and theoretical connectivity between suggested scales. We present the Observing Parent-Child Interaction Inventory (OPCII-1.0), which is designed to capture interaction patterns by integrating parenting behaviors with child temperament. The OPCII-1.0 assesses two neurobiological temperament dimensions, namely behavioral activation (BAS) and behavioral inhibition (BIS), which influence attention, emotional reactivity, needs, and behavior. These first-order dimensions shape six second-order traits: need for activity, autonomy, security, (quiet/loud × positive/negative) emotional expression, and effortful control. Parenting is conceptualized within two higher-order domains. Positive parenting includes sensitivity/responsiveness, social behavior regulation, cognitive support/stimulation, and regulating one’s own positive and negative emotions. Negative parenting encompasses denial of autonomy, passive and active rejection, intrusiveness, and rejection sensitivity. There are also indices for over- and underinvolvement as well as impaired predictability. Crossing four parenting constellations with four BIS/BAS-based child profiles yields 16 theoretically defined interaction patterns, which define a parenting-temperament misfit and enable risk prediction. We advance transparent and replicable test development through explicit item generation instructions (IGIs) and multi-source item content, as well as face and ecological validity pretesting with experts, novices and ChatGPT-4o. The planned analyses and validation criteria for the next steps in test development are presented.notReviewedothe
Zukunft erleben, Wandel gestalten: Die Kraft konkreter Utopien
No full textWenn Menschen sich sorgen, durch gesellschaftliche Veränderung ihren Lebensstandard zu verlieren, kann das zu einem düsteren Blick in die Zukunft führen. Um dem entgegenzuwirken, können Räume und Gelegenheiten geschaffen werden, in denen Menschen konkrete Konzepte einer nachhaltigen Zukunft entwickeln und erleben. Dadurch werden Alternativen zum Status quo greifbar und neue Normen und Ideen können gemeinsam entwickelt werden. Wir leiten drei Handlungsempfehlungen ab, die sich unkompliziert auf kommunaler und (Schul-)curricularer Ebene umsetzen lassen.peerReviewe
Code for: Not that different after all: Pro-environmental social norms predict pro-environmental behavior (also) among those believing in conspiracy theories
No full textSocial norms are powerful predictors of pro-environmental behavior. At the same time, conspiracy beliefs are prevalent that can reduce individuals’ efforts to act pro-environmentally and might impede the influence of social norms. Across three cross-sectional studies in three countries (Germany, UK, US; total N = 1,037), we investigated the interplay between different types of social norm perceptions and conspiracy beliefs in predicting everyday pro-environmental behavior. Against two out of three hypotheses, we found no evidence that conspiracy beliefs moderated the relationship between perceived social norms and self-reported pro-environmental behavior. Rather, perceiving higher pro-environmental social (especially subjective and injunctive) norms was associated with more frequent pro-environmental behavior – also among those with stronger conspiracy beliefs. Conspiracy beliefs (especially those related to climate change) were, in turn, related to less pro-environmental behavior. These findings shed light on the social factors that might (also) influence individuals believing in conspiracy theories and give reason for optimism regarding the possibility to overcome their climate inaction via normative influence.Code for: Winter, K., Pummerer, L. & Sassenberg, K. (in press). Not that different after all: Pro-environmental social norms predict pro-environmental behavior (also) among those believing in conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology.unknownunknow
Loneliness facing in therapy – Perspectives on comparative and integrative therapy
No full textDie vorliegende Arbeit widmet sich dem Thema Einsamkeit, ein Phänomen, welches uns in der Therapie häufig begegnet und seit langem auch in der Öffentlichkeit angekommen ist. Ausgehend von einer Begriffsdefinition und Abgrenzungsüberlegungen wird die Epidemiologie sowie Ätiologie beleuchtet. Weitere Kapitel widmen sich den schulenspezifischen Behandlungsansätzen. Die Arbeit schliesst mit der Auseinandersetzung des Phänomens vor dem Hintergrund der Integrativen Therapie. Wichtige theoretische Grundlagen und Kernkonzepte der Integrativen Therapie werden vorgestellt und bezogen auf die Begleitung von Menschen mit Einsamkeit erläutert. Zentrale Elemente sind dabei Förderung von Zwischen-leiblichkeit durch Leibarbeit, Komplexe Achtsamkeit, Korrespondenzfähigkeit, Ko-Kreativität und eine gute therapeutische Beziehungsarbeit.The present work is devoted to the topic of loneliness, a phenomenon that we often encounter in therapy and has for a long time also arrived in the public. Starting from a definition and delineation considerations, the epidemiology and etiology are elucidated. Further chapters are devoted to school-specific treatment approaches. The work concludes with the examination of the phenomenon against the background of integrative therapy. Important theoretical foundations and core concepts of integrative therapy are presented and explained in relation to the accompaniment of people with loneliness. Central elements are the promotion of inter-corporeality through serfdom, complex mindfulness, ability to correspond, co-creativity and good therapeutic relationship work.https://www.fpi-publikation.de/polyloge/16-2025-kummer-a-einsamkeit-in-der-therapie-begegnen-perspektiven-vergleichender-und-integrativer-therapie/peerReviewedpublishedVersio
Die genetische Architektur von Verhaltensstörungen: Erforschung der Rolle der Epigenetik in der Psychiatrie
No full textNo abstract
available.reviewedpublishedVersio
Nash Equilibrium Explains Why Billionaires Exist. New Pairing Structures for the “Prisoner’s Dilemma”
No full textNash Equilibrium allows for the analysis of a wide range of anthropological, economic, and
psychological phenomena from a strictly logical perspective and with mathematical rigor.
Nash proved that, in certain scenarios, all agents involved can make choices that are not
the best, and yet it is not advantageous for them to change their decision. However, Nash’s
original formulation only addresses the case in which individuals interact only once. The
undue generalization of this solution to contexts with many agents and multiple interactions
has generated misinterpretations with negative impacts on politics, economics, and other
sectors, often resulting in significant waste of resources. In 1981 and 1984, tournaments
conducted by Robert Axelrod showed that, in populations with varied profiles and
numerous interactions, the most effective strategies are almost the opposite of those
suggested by Nash. Since then, several studies have been conducted along the same lines,
modifying parameters such as “number of agents”, “agent criteria”, “reward values”, etc.
However, they did not explore changes in the structure of the pairing system, which are
fundamental to understanding certain phenomena and to more faithfully reproducing the
dynamics in real populations of living beings, especially complex human societies. In this
article, we introduce a twofold methodological innovation: (a) new pairing structures that
simulate partner selection in the real world and (b) a new metric capable of converting
tournament scores into a scale that reflects inequalities of several orders of magnitude. The
combined application of these tools reveals two crucial phenomena: first, the mechanism
by which preferential cooperation amplifies inequality to levels compatible with the
existence of billionaires; and second, how highly cooperative agents can become trapped
in hostile environments due to the hermetic clustering that consolidates soon after the
initial interactions, hindering social mobility, even when there are objective and measurable
merits for advancement, a problem that requires urgent attention.notReviewedothe