PsychArchives (ZPID Leibniz-Zentrum für Psychologische Information und Dokumentation)
Not a member yet
20791 research outputs found
Sort by
Does inner speech aid Lego construction? Study 2
This study is a replication and extension of a previously preregistered study (https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.14236). Both the previously preregistered study and the current study investigate the contribution of inner speech to LEGO construction.unknownothe
Supplementary materials [researchData] to "Civic engagement and civic competences in adolescence: A gender-based perspective"
Supplementary materials [researchData] to: Ingoglia, S., Iannello, N. M., Cavarretta, M. V., Inguglia, C., Barrett, M., Tenenbaum, H., Wiium, N., Baviera, C., Cucinella, N., & Lo Coco, A. (2025). Civic engagement and civic competences in adolescence: A gender-based perspective. Social Psychological Bulletin, 20, Article e13645. https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.13645The supplementary material includes the Codebook, the Dataset and Mplus models.unknow
Dataset for: How to Promote Emotional Intelligence among University Students: a Research Synthesis
Emotional intelligence (EI) training is increasingly relevant for students as a vulnerable group prone to stress, anxiety, and depression. The diversity of models upon which the trainings are based, the content of the featured units, and the broad spectrum of existing measures call for systematization and providing a landscape of existing training. We conducted a systematic review in such databases as Web of Science, Scopus, ERIC, Educational Source, and APA PsychArticles and included 49 (quasi)-experimental studies in the analysis. The findings indicate the need for more theoretically grounded EI training programs for university students, the scarcity of ability-based and other-rater measures, and the need for better alignment between models, content, and measures. Future research could move in the direction of setting quality benchmarks for EI training and investigating which kinds of models and content are more appropriate for specific population groups.unknow
Supplementary Materials: result tables hypotheses 2 and 3_ISPO Study
Supplementary Materials to the Stage 2 Registered Report: Impulsivity and online sports betting behavior: Untangling the causal relationshipThe rapid expansion of online sports betting has raised concerns about its potential impact on individual health and public health. In order to further develop etiological models for gambling disorder (GD) in sports betting, it is essential to unravel the underlying causal processes. Recent studies have identified risky online gambling behavior as an early indicator of GD. This study focuses on impulsivity as a well-documented risk factor for GD and investigated whether increased impulsivity leads to risky online gambling behavior and subsequently contributes to GD. Impulsivity, risky gambling behavior, and GD symptoms were assessed three times at three-month intervals using a longitudinal cross-lagged panel design. We recruited a final sample of n = 427 regular sports bettors from the online gambling provider Tipico. Impulsivity and GD were assessed using a combination of online experimental tasks and questionnaires. As a measure of risky gambling behavior, Tipico provided player tracking data for allparticipants. Random intercept cross‐lagged panel models were used to test the evidence for our hypotheses. Results showed partial support for the role of impulsivity in the development of GD, particularly through facets such as impulsive choice and certain impulsive personality traits. However, the findings suggest that impulsivity does not directly predict risky betting behavior, nor does such behavior mediate the relationship between impulsivity and GD severity. These results emphasize the complexity of pathways to GD, highlighting the need to explore multifactorial models incorporating emotional, cognitive, and environmental mediators.unknownunknow
The “favorite person” in borderline personality disorder: A content analysis of social media posts
In the borderline personality disorder (BPD) online community, shared experience has led to the emergence of the term “favorite person” (FP) to describe a unique interpersonal relationship. Despite its widespread use, this term has not been defined in the scholarly literature. The purpose of this exploratory study was to develop a working definition of FP through quantitative content analysis of relevant Instagram posts. Results suggest that FP may be defined as an insecure attachment figure who consumes the thoughts and evokes the abandonment fears of individuals with BPD. The FP is viewed as a rescuer and depended on for a sense of identity and emotional validation. Reactivity of mood and a tendency to hypermentalize around the FP may contribute to the instability evident in these relationships. These findings offer a novel understanding of the lived experience of BPD relationships, having important implications for treatment and stigma reduction.reviewedacceptedVersio
Research data and codebook for the study "Coping strategies of emerging adult children of parents with a mental illness"
Although research suggests that coping plays a central role in the transgenerational transmission of psychopathology, there is limited knowledge about the coping strategies of emerging adult children of parents with a mental illness and the associations with mental health and attachment patterns. This cross-sectional study examined these coping strategies among emerging adult children, both with and without parents with a mental illness (n=139, age range 18-30 years), using an online survey. A one-way MANOVA revealed that offspring of parents with a mental illness exhibited higher levels of the coping strategy Behavioral Disengagement (partial η² = .03, p < .05) and lower levels of Positive Reframing (partial η² = .04, p < .05) compared to the control group. Regression analyses indicated that for those affected by parental mental illness, greater use of Active Coping (b = 6.27, p < .05), Substance Use (b = 4.11, p < .05) and Self-Blame (b = 8.48, p < .001) predicted more symptoms of psychopathology, while greater use of Self-Blame predicted poorer mental health (b = -.28, p < .05). These findings highlight the importance of integrating coping strategies into prevention and intervention services for emerging adults with parents who have a mental illness.This research was supported by a grant from the Catholic University of NRW.unknow
Loneliness and distress in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study of German university students
Background: Characterized by uncertainty and recurring periods of social isolation, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in increases of loneliness and distress in young adults, such as university students. Despite the lifting of the last restrictions in Germany in April 2023, the state of mental health in vulnerable groups after the three-year global crisis remains to be investigated. Therefore, we aimed to assess university students’ mental health after the pandemic. Method: Between April and July 2023, N = 886 university students throughout Germany participated in a fully anonymous cross-sectional online survey. Psychological distress (BSI; Brief Symptom Inventory), loneliness (LS-SOEP; Loneliness Scale), and emotion regulation strategies (ERQ; Emotion Regulation Questionnaire) were assessed by standardized questionnaires, and mental health was compared to a survey of students in April 2020 (N = 1,062). Results: Unexpectedly, we found higher levels of distress in 2023 than in 2020. Overall, R2adj = 41% of variance in psychological distress was accounted for in a multiple linear regression, with loneliness emerging as the most important predictor. Additionally, emotion regulation, gender identity, and health behaviors such as keeping daily routines, sufficient sleep, and regular exercise were significant predictors. Analyses of variance (ANOVAs) revealed that students with past or present mental health conditions were significantly lonelier than those without. Conclusion: These findings highlight the ongoing mental health challenges of university students in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, identifying non-binary and female students, as well as students with current or past mental health conditions as particularly lonely and distressed.peerReviewedpublishedVersio
Empirically informed, idiographic networks of concordant and discordant motives: An experience sampling study with network analysis in non-clinical participants
Background: Case formulations and treatment planning mostly rely on self-reports, observations, and third-party reports. We propose that these data sources can be complemented by idiographic networks of motive interactions, which are empirically derived from everyday life using the Experience Sampling Method (ESM). In these networks, positive edges represent concordance of motives whereas negative edges indicate discordance. Based on consistency theory, which states that discordance emerges when the activity of one motive (e.g., ‘affiliation’) is incompatible with the activity of another motive (e.g., ‘autonomy’), we hypothesized that discordance would be associated with subclinical depressive symptoms. Method: Fifty-one undergraduates completed a six-day ESM assessment period with 6 assessments of motive satisfaction per day. Based on the ESM data, idiographic networks of the seven most important motives per person were computed using mlVAR (https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.mlVAR). We extracted indices of motive dynamics from each person’s network, namely the strength of negative edges compared to the overall network strength as well as the values of the single most negative and positive edges. These indices were then used to predict subclinical depressive symptoms, controlling for overall motive satisfaction. Results: Discordant, conflicting motive relationships made up only 6% of network strengths, indicating high concordance overall. Neither conflict index predicted subclinical depressive symptoms but maximum concordance was associated with lower subclinical depressive symptoms. Motive satisfaction was a significant predictor across models. Conclusion: The applicability and clinical utility of the motive network approach was promising. Insufficient variance due to a healthy sample and the small number of observations limit the interpretability of findings.peerReviewedpublishedVersio
Sustainable Neurocosmetics: A Comprehensive Scientific Literature Review on Social Responsibility, Psychological Well-Being, and Aesthetic Innovation
Background: The landscape of aesthetic medicine and the broader cosmetics industry is undergoing a profound transformation, moving beyond a sole focus on physical appearance toward a more holistic, wellness-oriented paradigm. This evolution is driven by a confluence of scientific advancements, a deeper understanding of the mind-body connection, and a growing consumer demand for products and practices that are not only efficacious but also ethically sound and socially responsible. Central to this discussion is the concept of the "skin-brain axis," a bidirectional communication network that intimately connects the integumentary system with the central nervous system. This axis is not merely a biological curiosity but is increasingly recognized as the primary mechanism through which neurocosmetics can exert their effects, bridging the gap between external application and an individual's internal psychological state. The skin, a complex "neuroimmunoendocrine organ," contains a dense network of nerve endings and receptors that provide a direct pathway to the brain's emotional centers. Methods: This report provides a comprehensive scientific literature review on the emerging field of sustainable neurocosmetics, examining its complexities through a triple lens of social responsibility, psychological well-being, and aesthetic innovation. This literature review aims to synthesize findings from a wide range of academic disciplines, including dermatology, neuroscience, social psychology, and consumer behavior. This interdisciplinary approach is essential for a nuanced understanding, as a considerable body of scholarly work on aesthetic medicine and beauty resides in "disciplinary silos," with researchers in fields like psychology focusing exclusively on psychological outcomes and vice versa (Williams, 2022). A systematic literature search was conducted across databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar using key terms like "sustainable neurocosmetics," "skin-brain axis," "psychological well-being in aesthetics," "corporate social responsibility cosmetics," and "cultural variations aesthetic medicine," focusing on publications from 2015 to 2025. The collected research underwent thematic analysis to identify trends, consensus, contradictions, and gaps. Results: By integrating these diverse perspectives, this review seeks to: (1) define the scientific mechanisms of neurocosmetics and delineate them from traditional cosmetology; (2) analyze the psychological implications of aesthetic practices, particularly in the context of social media and digital culture; (3) scrutinize the ethical and social responsibilities incumbent upon the industry; and (4) identify key aesthetic and technological innovations shaping the field. The review posits that this intricate connection is the foundation upon which the future of cosmetics will be built, enabling the industry to deliver both tangible aesthetic improvements and measurable psychological benefits. Key findings include the role of neuroactive ingredients in modulating the skin-brain axis, high BDD prevalence in aesthetic patients, CSR influences on consumer intentions, and cultural variations in preferences (Arian et al., 2023). Conclusions: The future of aesthetic medicine and neurocosmetic science is a confluence of physical innovation, psychological well-being, and social responsibility. The industry's legitimacy and positive impact will be determined by its commitment to transparent, patient-centered, and ethically grounded practices.notReviewedothe
Begleitende Beobachtung der 2. Wiederholungsbefragung 1995/1996 (3. Welle der Berliner Altersstudie)
Accompanying observation of the 2nd follow-up survey 1995/1996 used during the third wave of the Berlin Aging Study. The multidisciplinary Berlin Aging Study (BASE) was conducted by the Research Group on Aging and Societal Development of the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences in collaboration with institutes and research centers belonging to the Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and the Max Planck Institute for Human Development. The study was initially directed by a steering committee consisting of the late Paul B. Baltes (chair), head of the BASE Psychology Unit, Karl Ulrich Mayer (vice-chair), head of the BASE Sociology and Social Policy Unit, Hanfried Helmchen, head of the BASE Psychiatry Unit, and Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen, head of the BASE Internal Medicine and Geriatrics Unit. The project was supported financially by several organizations including the German Federal Ministry for Research and Technology (1989–1991, 13 TA 011 + 13 TA 011/A) and the German Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women, and Youth (1992–1998, 314-1722-102/9 + 314-1722-102/9a) as well as by the institutions involved. From 2008 to 2011, it was co-sponsored by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01UW0808). The Center for Lifespan Psychology at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development has led the project since 2008 and Ulman Lindenberger has meanwhile become the speaker of BASE (see also https://www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/research/research-centers/lip/projects/aging/base).BASE was established in 1989 to investigate questions about old and very old age from the joint and collaborative perspectives of four disciplines: psychiatry, psychology, sociology, and geriatrics/internal medicine (see Baltes et al., 1993, 2001). The initial goal of BASE (1990–1993) was to obtain extensive baseline information about old and very old age using a 14-session multidisciplinary Intensive Protocol covering older people’s mental and physical health, psychological functioning, and social and economic situation. The study design called for an age-by-sex stratified heterogeneous (locally representative) sample of 70- to over-100-year-olds. The central goal of the longitudinal study was to follow-up the core sample of participants who completed this Intensive Protocol. Extensive information about the baseline sample selectivity, assessment procedures, and cross-sectional findings are reported in Mayer and Baltes (1996; Baltes & Mayer, 1999; Baltes & Smith, 1997; Lindenberger et al., 1999).Begleitende Beobachtung der 2. Wiederholungsbefragung 1995/1996 von der dritten Welle der Berliner Altersstudie. Die multidisziplinäre Berliner Altersstudie (BASE) wurde von der Forschungsgruppe Altern und gesellschaftliche Entwicklung der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Zusammenarbeit mit Instituten und Forschungszentren der Freien Universität Berlin, der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin und dem Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung durchgeführt. Geleitet wurde die Studie zunächst von einem Lenkungsausschuss, bestehend aus dem verstorbenen Paul B. Baltes (Vorsitz), Leiter des BASE-Referats Psychologie, Karl Ulrich Mayer (stellvertretender Vorsitz), Leiter des BASE-Referats Soziologie und Sozialpolitik, Hanfried Helmchen, Leiter des BASE-Referats Psychiatrie, und Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen, Leiterin des BASE-Referats Innere Medizin und Geriatrie. Das Projekt wurde u.a. durch das Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie (1989-1991, 13 TA 011 + 13 TA 011/A) und das Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (1992-1998, 314-1722-102/9 + 314-1722-102/9a) sowie durch die beteiligten Institutionen finanziell unterstützt. Von 2008 bis 2011 wurde es vom Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01UW0808) mitgefördert. Das Center for Lifespan Psychology am Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung leitet das Projekt seit 2008 und Ulman Lindenberger ist inzwischen Sprecher von BASE (siehe auch https://www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/research/research-centers/lip/projects/aging/base).BASE wurde 1989 ins Leben gerufen, um Fragen zum Thema Alter und sehr hohes Alter aus der gemeinsamen und kooperativen Perspektive von vier Disziplinen zu untersuchen: Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Soziologie und Geriatrie/Innere Medizin (siehe Baltes et al., 1993, 2001). Ursprüngliches Ziel der BASE-Studie (1990-1993) war es, mit Hilfe eines multidisziplinären Intensivprotokolls, das 14 Sitzungen umfasste und die geistige und körperliche Gesundheit, das psychologische Funktionieren sowie die soziale und wirtschaftliche Situation älterer Menschen abdeckte, umfassende Basisinformationen über das Alter und das sehr hohe Alter zu erhalten. Das Studiendesign sah eine nach Alter und Geschlecht geschichtete, heterogene (lokal repräsentative) Stichprobe von 70- bis über 100-Jährigen vor. Das Hauptziel der Längsschnittstudie bestand darin, die Kernstichprobe der Teilnehmer, die das Intensivprotokoll absolviert haben, weiter zu verfolgen. Ausführliche Informationen über die Auswahl der Ausgangsstichprobe, die Beurteilungsverfahren und die Querschnittsergebnisse sind in Mayer und Baltes (1996; Baltes & Mayer, 1999; Baltes & Smith, 1997; Lindenberger et al., 1999) zu finden.notReviewedunknow