PsychArchives (ZPID Leibniz-Zentrum für Psychologische Information und Dokumentation)
Not a member yet
20791 research outputs found
Sort by
Begleitende Beobachtung der 7. Wiederholungsbefragung 2008 (8. Welle der Berliner Altersstudie)
No full textAccompanying observation of the 7th follow-up survey 2008 used during the eigth wave of the Berlin Aging Study. The multidisciplinary Berlin Aging Study (BASE) was conducted by the Research Group on Aging and Societal Development of the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences in collaboration with institutes and research centers belonging to the Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and the Max Planck Institute for Human Development. The study was initially directed by a steering committee consisting of the late Paul B. Baltes (chair), head of the BASE Psychology Unit, Karl Ulrich Mayer (vice-chair), head of the BASE Sociology and Social Policy Unit, Hanfried Helmchen, head of the BASE Psychiatry Unit, and Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen, head of the BASE Internal Medicine and Geriatrics Unit. The project was supported financially by several organizations including the German Federal Ministry for Research and Technology (1989–1991, 13 TA 011 + 13 TA 011/A) and the German Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women, and Youth (1992–1998, 314-1722-102/9 + 314-1722-102/9a) as well as by the institutions involved. From 2008 to 2011, it was co-sponsored by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01UW0808). The Center for Lifespan Psychology at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development has led the project since 2008 and Ulman Lindenberger has meanwhile become the speaker of BASE (see also https://www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/research/research-centers/lip/projects/aging/base).BASE was established in 1989 to investigate questions about old and very old age from the joint and collaborative perspectives of four disciplines: psychiatry, psychology, sociology, and geriatrics/internal medicine (see Baltes et al., 1993, 2001). The initial goal of BASE (1990–1993) was to obtain extensive baseline information about old and very old age using a 14-session multidisciplinary Intensive Protocol covering older people’s mental and physical health, psychological functioning, and social and economic situation. The study design called for an age-by-sex stratified heterogeneous (locally representative) sample of 70- to over-100-year-olds. The central goal of the longitudinal study was to follow-up the core sample of participants who completed this Intensive Protocol. Extensive information about the baseline sample selectivity, assessment procedures, and cross-sectional findings are reported in Mayer and Baltes (1996; Baltes & Mayer, 1999; Baltes & Smith, 1997; Lindenberger et al., 1999).Begleitende Beobachtung der 7. Wiederholungsbefragung 2008 von der achten Welle der Berliner Altersstudie. Die multidisziplinäre Berliner Altersstudie (BASE) wurde von der Forschungsgruppe Altern und gesellschaftliche Entwicklung der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Zusammenarbeit mit Instituten und Forschungszentren der Freien Universität Berlin, der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin und dem Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung durchgeführt. Geleitet wurde die Studie zunächst von einem Lenkungsausschuss, bestehend aus dem verstorbenen Paul B. Baltes (Vorsitz), Leiter des BASE-Referats Psychologie, Karl Ulrich Mayer (stellvertretender Vorsitz), Leiter des BASE-Referats Soziologie und Sozialpolitik, Hanfried Helmchen, Leiter des BASE-Referats Psychiatrie, und Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen, Leiterin des BASE-Referats Innere Medizin und Geriatrie. Das Projekt wurde u.a. durch das Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie (1989-1991, 13 TA 011 + 13 TA 011/A) und das Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (1992-1998, 314-1722-102/9 + 314-1722-102/9a) sowie durch die beteiligten Institutionen finanziell unterstützt. Von 2008 bis 2011 wurde es vom Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01UW0808) mitgefördert. Das Center for Lifespan Psychology am Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung leitet das Projekt seit 2008 und Ulman Lindenberger ist inzwischen Sprecher von BASE (siehe auch https://www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/research/research-centers/lip/projects/aging/base).BASE wurde 1989 ins Leben gerufen, um Fragen zum Thema Alter und sehr hohes Alter aus der gemeinsamen und kooperativen Perspektive von vier Disziplinen zu untersuchen: Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Soziologie und Geriatrie/Innere Medizin (siehe Baltes et al., 1993, 2001). Ursprüngliches Ziel der BASE-Studie (1990-1993) war es, mit Hilfe eines multidisziplinären Intensivprotokolls, das 14 Sitzungen umfasste und die geistige und körperliche Gesundheit, das psychologische Funktionieren sowie die soziale und wirtschaftliche Situation älterer Menschen abdeckte, umfassende Basisinformationen über das Alter und das sehr hohe Alter zu erhalten. Das Studiendesign sah eine nach Alter und Geschlecht geschichtete, heterogene (lokal repräsentative) Stichprobe von 70- bis über 100-Jährigen vor. Das Hauptziel der Längsschnittstudie bestand darin, die Kernstichprobe der Teilnehmer, die das Intensivprotokoll absolviert haben, weiter zu verfolgen. Ausführliche Informationen über die Auswahl der Ausgangsstichprobe, die Beurteilungsverfahren und die Querschnittsergebnisse sind in Mayer und Baltes (1996; Baltes & Mayer, 1999; Baltes & Smith, 1997; Lindenberger et al., 1999) zu finden.notReviewedunknow
Mikro-Längsschnitt Sitzung 1 der 6. Wiederholungsbefragung 2005 (7. Welle der Berliner Altersstudie)
No full textMicro longitudinal section Session 1 of the 6th follow-up survey 2005 used during the seventh wave of the Berlin Aging Study. The multidisciplinary Berlin Aging Study (BASE) was conducted by the Research Group on Aging and Societal Development of the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences in collaboration with institutes and research centers belonging to the Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and the Max Planck Institute for Human Development. The study was initially directed by a steering committee consisting of the late Paul B. Baltes (chair), head of the BASE Psychology Unit, Karl Ulrich Mayer (vice-chair), head of the BASE Sociology and Social Policy Unit, Hanfried Helmchen, head of the BASE Psychiatry Unit, and Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen, head of the BASE Internal Medicine and Geriatrics Unit. The project was supported financially by several organizations including the German Federal Ministry for Research and Technology (1989–1991, 13 TA 011 + 13 TA 011/A) and the German Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women, and Youth (1992–1998, 314-1722-102/9 + 314-1722-102/9a) as well as by the institutions involved. From 2008 to 2011, it was co-sponsored by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01UW0808). The Center for Lifespan Psychology at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development has led the project since 2008 and Ulman Lindenberger has meanwhile become the speaker of BASE (see also https://www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/research/research-centers/lip/projects/aging/base).BASE was established in 1989 to investigate questions about old and very old age from the joint and collaborative perspectives of four disciplines: psychiatry, psychology, sociology, and geriatrics/internal medicine (see Baltes et al., 1993, 2001). The initial goal of BASE (1990–1993) was to obtain extensive baseline information about old and very old age using a 14-session multidisciplinary Intensive Protocol covering older people’s mental and physical health, psychological functioning, and social and economic situation. The study design called for an age-by-sex stratified heterogeneous (locally representative) sample of 70- to over-100-year-olds. The central goal of the longitudinal study was to follow-up the core sample of participants who completed this Intensive Protocol. Extensive information about the baseline sample selectivity, assessment procedures, and cross-sectional findings are reported in Mayer and Baltes (1996; Baltes & Mayer, 1999; Baltes & Smith, 1997; Lindenberger et al., 1999).Mikro-Längsschnitt Sitzung 1 der 6. Wiederholungsbefragung 2005 von der siebten Welle der Berliner Altersstudie. Die multidisziplinäre Berliner Altersstudie (BASE) wurde von der Forschungsgruppe Altern und gesellschaftliche Entwicklung der Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Zusammenarbeit mit Instituten und Forschungszentren der Freien Universität Berlin, der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin und dem Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung durchgeführt. Geleitet wurde die Studie zunächst von einem Lenkungsausschuss, bestehend aus dem verstorbenen Paul B. Baltes (Vorsitz), Leiter des BASE-Referats Psychologie, Karl Ulrich Mayer (stellvertretender Vorsitz), Leiter des BASE-Referats Soziologie und Sozialpolitik, Hanfried Helmchen, Leiter des BASE-Referats Psychiatrie, und Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen, Leiterin des BASE-Referats Innere Medizin und Geriatrie. Das Projekt wurde u.a. durch das Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie (1989-1991, 13 TA 011 + 13 TA 011/A) und das Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (1992-1998, 314-1722-102/9 + 314-1722-102/9a) sowie durch die beteiligten Institutionen finanziell unterstützt. Von 2008 bis 2011 wurde es vom Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01UW0808) mitgefördert. Das Center for Lifespan Psychology am Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung leitet das Projekt seit 2008 und Ulman Lindenberger ist inzwischen Sprecher von BASE (siehe auch https://www.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/research/research-centers/lip/projects/aging/base).BASE wurde 1989 ins Leben gerufen, um Fragen zum Thema Alter und sehr hohes Alter aus der gemeinsamen und kooperativen Perspektive von vier Disziplinen zu untersuchen: Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Soziologie und Geriatrie/Innere Medizin (siehe Baltes et al., 1993, 2001). Ursprüngliches Ziel der BASE-Studie (1990-1993) war es, mit Hilfe eines multidisziplinären Intensivprotokolls, das 14 Sitzungen umfasste und die geistige und körperliche Gesundheit, das psychologische Funktionieren sowie die soziale und wirtschaftliche Situation älterer Menschen abdeckte, umfassende Basisinformationen über das Alter und das sehr hohe Alter zu erhalten. Das Studiendesign sah eine nach Alter und Geschlecht geschichtete, heterogene (lokal repräsentative) Stichprobe von 70- bis über 100-Jährigen vor. Das Hauptziel der Längsschnittstudie bestand darin, die Kernstichprobe der Teilnehmer, die das Intensivprotokoll absolviert haben, weiter zu verfolgen. Ausführliche Informationen über die Auswahl der Ausgangsstichprobe, die Beurteilungsverfahren und die Querschnittsergebnisse sind in Mayer und Baltes (1996; Baltes & Mayer, 1999; Baltes & Smith, 1997; Lindenberger et al., 1999) zu finden.notReviewedunknow
Vignette on patient education for contrast-enhanced CT
No full textThis vignette was used in several studies on informed decision-making in the context of medical risk communication. It stimulates a patient education setting prior to a contrast-enhanced CT scan.unknownunknow
Supplementary materials to "The Hybrid Modern Network Model: A multi-technique framework for comprehensive network analysis" [Code]
No full textSupplementary materials [Code]. The related article is Kyriazos, T., & Poga, M. (2025). The Hybrid Modern Network Model: A multi-technique framework for comprehensive network analysis. Interpersona, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.15021The supplementary materials include R code and scripts: The complete R implementation of the HMNM, covers all model components, network generation procedures, simulation settings, evaluation functions, and performance metrics. This includes all files necessary to reproduce the results presented in the empirical illustration.unknownunknow
Psychiatric and psychological brief psychotherapy for depression PKP
No full textThis work presents the Psychiatric and Psychological Brief Psychotherapy PKP for depression, which is based on the three pillars (modules) of symptom therapy (dealing with the symptom), skills training (exposure to joy, fear, anger and grief) and working with the dysfunctional survival rule (establishing a new life rule that gives permission). Originally working with consultation cards, a PKP manual for each disorder is now the guideline for the specific therapeutic procedure. The difference to conventional therapy manuals is the modular structure, which is aimed at personalised, individual therapy planning and implementation. This results in a flexible therapy concept that differs from patient to patient.https://eupehs.org/haupt/european-psychotherapy/peerReviewedpublishedVersio
Associations and interactions between neuroticism, adverse life events and health anxiety: Results from a large representative cohort
No full textPurpose: Adverse life events and neuroticism have been shown to be associated with health anxiety (HA), but their interaction has not been studied. This study aimed to examine the separate associations as well as the possible interaction effect of neuroticism and adverse life events with HA. Method: Cross-sectional self-report data originated from a representative Danish population cohort (DanFunD) (N = 7,493, 18-72 years, 53% females). Primary measures were HA (Whiteley Index 6 revised), neuroticism (NEO personality Inventory Revised short form), and adverse life events (Cumulative Lifetime Adversity Measure, CLAM). The CLAM was split into illness/death related life events (IDE) and other adverse life events (OAE) to test the specificity of IDEs. Results: Adjusted ordinal logistic regression models showed positive associations with HA for IDEs (OR = 1.05, CI [1.03, 1.08]), OAEs (OR = 1.05, CI [1.03, 1.07]) and neuroticism (OR = 1.08, CI [1.07, 1.09]). A Wald's test revealed no difference in association with HA for IDEs and OAEs (p = .82). Adjusted models showed an interaction effect for neuroticism*IDEs (OR = 1.002, CI [1.000, 1.004]), but not for neuroticism*OAEs (OR = 0.999, CI [0.996, 1.002]). Conclusion: Associations with HA were found for both adverse life events and neuroticism. Size of association did not differ for IDEs and OAEs. Only IDEs interacted with neuroticism.peerReviewedpublishedVersio
Dataset for: Ramirez Butavand, Nagel, Feld & Steib. High intensity exercise before sleep boosts memory encoding the next morning
No full textPlease refer to the README file and the codebooks for further details about each data file. The importance of sleep for memory consolidation has been extensively studied, but its role for memory encoding remains less well characterized. At the molecular and cellular level, the renormalization of synaptic weights during sleep has received substantial support, which is thought to free capacity to encode new information at the behavioral level. However, at the systems level and behaviorally, support for this process playing a major role for memory function remains scarce. In the current study, we investigated the utility of moderate- and high-intensity evening exercise as a low-cost low-tech intervention to modulate sleep and its influence on subsequent encoding in the morning. Our findings indicate that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) improved post-sleep memory performance with effects lasting up to 24 hours after initial encoding. In addition, we show that especially the early parts of the encoding task were affected by the HIIT intervention. Intriguingly, participants with lower encoding abilities seemed to benefit more from the HIIT intervention suggesting it not only as a tool for basic research but also as a candidate for applications to boost memory performance in mental disorders or in the elderly. These results provide first evidence that acute exercise can affect learning processes even hours after it occurs.unknow
Dataset for: The efficacy of psychotherapy and pharmacological treatments for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials, PE
No full textStandardized CAMA dataset based on: The efficacy of psychotherapy and pharmacological treatments for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (PROSPERO Preregistration: CRD42020171289). Treatment subgroup: Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PE).unknow
Affective reactions when learning that our answer is biased: The role of negative feedback in the arousal of epistemic emotions
No full textThis study investigated how different types of feedback influence emotional reactions in decision-making tasks involving high-confidence errors. The sample consisted of 596 undergraduate and postgraduate university students. Participants completed tasks and received either low informative feedback (indicating correctness) or high informative feedback (offering detailed explanations of correct answers). They reported their confidence levels and epistemic emotions of surprise, confusion, and curiosity. Participants reported epistemic emotions after each type of feedback. The results showed that confidence ratings did not differ between correct and incorrect answers. Incorrect answers elicited higher levels of surprise, curiosity, and confusion than correct answers. High informative feedback significantly reduced epistemic emotions, especially confusion, compared to low informative feedback. These results highlight the importance of detailed feedback in shaping epistemic emotions and enhancing learning in problem-solving contexts. Implications for research and teaching practices are discussed.peerReviewedpublishedVersio
Animal-assisted intervention with Dogs in an inpatient Dementia Area of a Seniors‘ Residence with a Focus on Biographical Work in Relation to the 5 Pillars of Identity
No full textDiese Arbeit befasst sich mit dem Thema Demenz im Kontext einer Seniorenresidenz. Zunächst wird das Krankheitsbild der Demenz unter gerontologischem Aspekt erläutert. Ein weiterer Schwerpunkt liegt auf der Biographiearbeit, insbesondere für demenzkranke Klient:innen. Die drei Dimensionen der Persönlichkeit – Selbst, Ich und Identität – sowie die fünf Säulen der Identität werden vorgestellt. Es wird ein Einblick in den aktuellen Forschungsstand zur tiergestützten Intervention in der Demenzbetreuung gegeben, insbesondere bei der stationären Arbeit. Im Praxisteil wird im Sinne der Theorie-Praxis-Verschränkung ein möglicher Ablauf von Gruppen- und Einzelsettings erläutert. Beide Settings basieren auf Biographiearbeit und den fünf Säulen der Identität, wobei auch tiergestützte Interventionen zum Einsatz kommen.This paper deals with the topic of dementia in the context of a retirement home. First, the clinical picture of dementia is explained from a gerontological perspective. A further focus is on biography work, especially for clients with dementia. The three dimensions of personality – self, ego and identity – and the five pillars of identity are presented. An insight is given into the current state of research on animal-assisted intervention in dementia care, especially in inpatient work. In the practical section, a possible sequence of group and individual settings is explained in terms of the theory-practice link. Both settings are based on biography work and the five pillars of identity, whereby animal-assisted interventions are also used.https://www.fpi-publikation.de/gruene-texte/01-2025-schwarze-m-die-tiergestuetzte-intervention-mit-hunden-in-der-stationaeren-arbeit-mit-demenzerkrankten-senioren-mit-dem-schwerpunkt-biographiearbeit/peerReviewedpublishedVersio