National Institute of Japanese Literature Repository / 国文学研究資料館学術情報リポジトリ
Not a member yet
3134 research outputs found
Sort by
Newsletter Fumi No.13
Get PDFpdf●ＡＩがくずし字を読む時代がやってきた
●「古代の甘味「あまつら」の復元とその試食」
●碑文のデジタル復元に関する手法研究と実践
ひかり拓本の開発
●津軽デジタル風土記 ねぷた見送り絵リブート！
～デジタルアーカイブからよみがえる北斎の女たち～」展レポート
●第五回日本語の歴史的典籍国際研究集会
●こんな古典籍があった！～拠点大学古典籍画像紹介～第5回
●トピックス
第３回EAJS日本会議、東京藝術大学附属図書館の貴重古典籍約560点をデジタル公開、イベント報告、海外における情報発信、協定書・覚書の締結othe
Proceedings of The 43rd International Conference on Japanese Literarure: Cover, Contents, Colophon
Get PDFpdfothe
The Development of the Shūgaku and Hōryū of Chief Priests at Regional Temples in the Early Modern Period: A Study of Religious Documents at Kakujō-in Temple
Get PDFpdfThe classical documents left in temples have basically been accumulated for the purpose of the shūgaku （study of dharma and praying） of the monks associated with the temples, and it is thought that the actual conditions of study in the temples and their surrounding areas can be clarified by the investigation and analysis of the books housed there. In addition, it is thought that the analysis of those religious documents （shōgyō） which are the traces of the study of the chief priests there will lead to clarification regarding the propagation and development of hōryū （dharma school） around the area where the temple is located. From the above viewpoint, I focused on the religious documents stored in Kakujō-in Temple （in Nio, Mitoyo-shi, Kagawa Prefecture）, where I participated in religious documents research, especially documents related to Chitai and Mutō, who served as chief priests there around the middle of the early-modern period, and Yukinori, who served as the chief priest of Konkō-ji Temple, a branch temple, and I considered the development of shūgaku and hōryū by monks in Kakujō-in Temple and the Nio area. （For example, in my article 「金光寺僧行範の修学―覚 城院蔵金光寺旧蔵聖教を中心に」 from the collection 『覚城院資料の調査と研究 〈Ⅰ〉 寺院文献資料学の新展開1』
（Rinsen Shoten 2019.10）, and my oral presentation 「覚城院における新安流の展開―無等止住期を中心に」 at the symposium of the April 27, 2019 meeting of Bukkyō Bungaku Gakkai on the topic of 「蔵書解析と しての聖教調査―覚城院と新安流を例として―」 .） In my paper and presentation, I pointed out （1） that training at Kakujō-in Temple and its branch temples around the middle of the early-modern period was based on the Shin-An school （New Anshōji school）, and that the Shin-An school had spread and developed to Kakujō-in Temple and Konkō-ji Temple to form a big dojo of the Shin-An school; （2） that in the background of the training of the monks there were connections not only with the Sanuki area but also, for example, with Bitchū-Onomichi （Jizen-in Temple） , Settsu-Nishinomiya （Kanno-ji Temple）, and Kōyasan （Jōbodai-in Temple among others）; and （3） that the accumulation and development of hōryū was not the work of separate individual temples. The above-mentioned propagation of the Shin-An school at Kakujō-in Temple and its branch temples, and ascetic practices of monks there based on the ShinAn school, began from the generation of Santō, who served as the chief priest of Kakujō-in Temple starting in Hoei 4 （1707）, according to research on religious documents at Kakujō-in. It is thought that by clarifying the study activities of Buddhist monks at Kakujō-in Temple during the period when Santō, Chitai, and Mutō were at the temple, the development of Buddhist teachings in and around Kakujō-in Temple can be made clear. Therefore, in this paper, I will consider the development of the Shin-An school in Kakujō-in Temple by examining the learning activities of the chief priests of Kakujō-in Temple （Santō, Chitai, and Mutō） and the chief priest of Konkō-ji Temple （Gyōban）, building on research conducted so far.conference pape
Translation Society: Translation Study and Tōwa Study in Early Modern Japan
Get PDFpdfThe publication of Ogyū Sorai’s 荻生徂徠 （1666－1728） Yakubun sentei 譯文筌 蹄 （A Tool for Translation, 1714－1715） and the formation of “Translation Society” （yakusha 譯社, first meeting 1711） was a phenomenon familiar to scholars working on Sino-Japanese literature in early modern Japan. Since the publication of Ishizaki Matazō’s 石崎又造 Kinsei Nihon niokeru Shina zokugo bungakushi 近世日本に おける支那俗語文学史 （The History of Vernacular Sinitic Literature in Early Modern Japan） in 1940, this phenomenon has been discussed in scholarly works. Specifically, Sorai’s “Prefatory Remarks in Ten Principles” 題言十則 in A Tool for Translation—the theoretical foundation for the translation study—has gained much attention and even generated a complete English translation （Pastreich 2001） . The Translation Society, on the other hand, has not been as well-received. It has often been regarded as a tōwa 唐話 （Chinese speech） study group organized by Sorai and his Ken’en 蘐園 school. However, the society was initiated by three founders—Sorai, his younger brother Ogyū Hokkei 荻生北渓 （1673－1754）, and a certain Sei Hakumei 井伯明 . Without question, Sorai was an essential figure to the society. However, his fame largely overshadowed the other participants of the society and obscured the aspects of the Translation Society that could not be fully covered by him and his Ken’en school. Focusing on the other founders and participants, the present study illuminates the aspects of the Translation Society beyond Sorai and the Ken’en school. Despite being a founder of the society, Sei Hakumei remains a mystery and even scholarly works discussing the Translation Society often omit him altogether.
While it might be difficult to have a definite answer to his identity with our current knowledge, it is possible to suggest some idea of what kind of person Sei Hakumei might have been. This study suggests one of such possible figures, Okai Kōryō 岡 井黄陵 （1666－1718）, whose his younger brother Okai Kenshū 岡井嵰州 （1702－ 1765） was recorded as a disciple of Sorai. Kōryō produced a manuscript for aiding tōwa study, Yakutsū ruiryaku 譯通類畧 （An Abridged Collection for Mastering Translation）, which shares much connection to Sorai’s A Tool for Translation and tōwa study primers based on the studies at Translation Society. The third founder, Sorai’s younger brother Hokkei, was an important figure in the study of Ming Code （Min Ritsu 明律） under the eighth Shogun Tokugawa Yoshimune 徳川吉宗 （1684－1751, shogun 1716－1745）. Hokkei was entrusted by Yoshimune and led a Ming legal code group. Hokkei’s works tend to be mistaken as Sorai’s or at least considered to be influenced by Sorai. This study divorces Hokkei from his elder brother through focusing on how Hokkei’s legal code group was recorded in Ken’en zatsuwa 蘐園雑話 （Miscellaneous Talks of Ken’en Academy） , a collection of the words and deeds of the Ken’en associates.conference pape
Research notes on "SANTO Kyoden" edited by MIYATAKE Gaikotsu
Get PDFpdf大正五（一九一六）年十一月二十日に刊行された『山東京伝』は、近世後期を代表する戯作者山東京伝の全貌を捉えた初の専門書として、そこに記された多様な資料の紹介の点からも、今日なお評価が高い。本書の編者は宮武外骨。京伝百回忌を記念しての刊行物である。本書執筆に関連した資料が、東京大学法学部附属明治新聞雑誌文庫に残されていることはあまり知られていない。その資料と当時の新聞記事などから、『山東京伝』刊行をめぐる諸事情、ならびに京伝百年祭について確認したい。departmental bulletin pape
Transition of Kasho Focusing on the Early Edo Period
Get PDFpdfFor waka poetry collections (kasho歌書), hand-copied manuscripts have traditionally been considered the most valuable and prestigious. On the other hand, printed books of kasho have been considered as just “widespread editions” and have never surpassed the quality and historical significance of actual manuscripts. However, printed books of kasho played a major role in establishing the foundation of intellect for a variety of classes of people. While literature scholars have accumulated information about printed books of Japanese literary classics, like Kokin wakashū 古今和歌集, or Hyakunin isshu百人一首, it is difficult to draw conclusions about the characteristics, trends, developments and vicissitudes of the entity of the printed books of kasho. In this study, the transition of the printed books of kasho will be analyzed from four aspects such as the “Kan’ei era”, “fundamental books”, “bookbinding and format”, and “shapes and sizes of the books”, and the role that printed books of kasho played will be considered.
＊This study is a translated version of KANSAKU Ken-ichi’s 神作研一 “Kasho no hensen: Edo zenki wo chūshin ni” 歌書の変遷—江戸前期を中心に —, in Kinsei wakashi no kenkyū 近世和歌史の研究. Tokyo: Kadokawa Gakugei Shuppan. 2013.departmental bulletin pape
Arrangement and Description of Modern Architectural Records: A Case Study of the Otaka Masato Archive
Get PDFpdf本稿では、文化庁国立近現代建築資料館（以下、建築資料館）で収蔵している大髙正人建築設計資料群を事例に、近現代建築資料の編成記述について検討する。大髙正人（1923−2010）は、建築のみならず都市計画の分野でも活躍した建築家である。当該資料群はその活動の幅広さを反映しており、建築設計図面に加えて、大判の都市計画図や大量の報告書等も含まれている。建築資料館は2013年の開館以来、近現代建築資料の収集や展覧会開催を通じての活用とともに、資料整理の方法についても検討を行ってきた。その過程を振り返り、整理方法の再検討を行ったうえで、早期の閲覧公開を実現することを目指す観点から、近現代建築資料の編成記述方法について考察し、今後の課題について述べる。departmental bulletin pape
AkatsukinoKanenari`Komoti Nezumi Hana no Yamauba`tentative theory
Get PDFpdf大坂の人気戯作者、暁鐘成は『鼠花山姥』（文政十年刊）で、近松門左衛門「嫗山姥」を題材としている。「嫗山姥」は、当時人気の女形、荻野八重桐の芸を浄瑠璃に取り込んだ作品で、現代まで上演され続ける評価の高い作品である。しかし、文化文政期に頻繁に上演されていた演目、とまではいえない。『鼠花山姥』は、絵入根本の流行の流れに乗った演劇利用作であり、文政三年の大評判をとった舞台から上演が続くようになり、文政八年の舞台をピークにした、演劇での「嫗山姥」再評価とも言える動きを契機に執筆を計画したと考える。同様の演劇利用に長けた作者、江島其磧と比し、絵を巧みに利用した独自の工夫が見られる作と評価できるdepartmental bulletin pape