Gardner–Webb University

Digital Commons @ Gardner-Webb University
Not a member yet
    9814 research outputs found

    Faculty Hiring Procedures

    No full text

    Camp Worker New Hire Form

    No full text

    GWU Personnel Policy Manual

    No full text

    2024 Payroll Schedule

    No full text

    Key Access Request Form

    No full text

    Staff Performance Evaluation Form

    No full text

    Staff - Employee Self Evaluation Form

    No full text

    A Program Evaluation Case Study on the Impact of Standards-Based Grading in a North Carolina School District

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this study was to conduct a program evaluation case study on the impact of standards-based grading in a North Carolina school district. The implementation procedures and end products of grading reform were assessed using the CIPP model. Data from teacher questionnaires, principal implementation checklists, interviews, and end-of-grade (EOG) test results were used in this mixed methods study. The program evaluation examined the implementation\u27s advantages and disadvantages and offered suggestions for improvement. The research questions examined teacher and principal perceptions of the impact of implementation. Themes of the district\u27s implementation strengths and weaknesses were identified through the use of thematic analysis. The key findings focused on the apparent impact of grading reform when Coherence Framework drivers are present and aligned. Clear impact with regard to summative EOG test data also indicated significance in using standards-based grades to provide feedback. Areas that were identified as needing improvement surrounded consistency and support in focusing direction, cultivating collaborative cultures, deepening learning, securing accountability, and leadership. Knowing the perceived effectiveness, even when all the right drivers are not perfectly consistent, may help teachers and leaders commit to the implementation efforts when striving to more effectively support teaching and learning. The results of this study produced clear implications for maintaining standards-based grading implementation efforts. Furthermore, maximizing the potential of future reform initiatives and making them easier to replicate in the future will come from realizing the support that building leaders and teachers require to be better prepared to support grading reform efforts in their schools

    Session IC: Education and Psychology Presentation 2 - Ethical Exploration of ChatGPT in the Modern K-14 Classroom

    Get PDF
    The work showcases an ethical decision analysis that is rooted in normative and virtue ethics to support educators in choosing to use ChatGPT in their classroom. This paper’s importance is empowered further by the continued development of artificial intelligence language modeling programs, usages from students, and growth of ChatGPT’s integration in CoPilot

    Bridging the Gap: Strategies to Enrich the Clinical Experience of Undergraduate Nursing Students to Improve Clinical Judgment Skills

    Get PDF
    Introduction: The lack of competent clinical judgement among new graduate nurses contributes to poor patient outcomes, negatively impacting patient satisfaction scores, and subsequently raising the cost of healthcare for consumers. This project explores how reflective journaling and cooperative learning activities contribute to the development of critical thinking of nursing students during their Nursing Fundamentals clinical practicum. Methods: Seventeen students enrolled in a private university nursing program were selected as the sample. The students were introduced to the recommended learning strategies and invited to anonymously participate in a pre-survey and post-survey. The surveys were identical in content and consisted of eight statements, aimed to identify perceptions of the impact reflective journaling and cooperative learning activities have on their critical thinking, by using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly agree, 2 = agree, 3 = neutral, 4 = disagree, 5 = strongly disagree). Qualitative data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Out of the 17 nursing students who were invited to participate, 2 students responded to the pre-survey questionnaire and 3 students responded to the post-surgery questionnaire. One student reported a positive impact on critical thinking after implementing cooperative learning and reflective journaling. Discussion: These findings may imply a gained interest in the learning strategies as they were applied in the clinical practicum

    8,870

    full texts

    9,814

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    Digital Commons @ Gardner-Webb University
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇