Alberta Academic Review
Not a member yet
    34936 research outputs found

    Non-Archimedean Probability

    No full text
    We propose an alternative approach to probability theory closely related to the framework of numerosity theory: non-Archimedean probability (NAP). In our approach, unlike in classical probability theory, all subsets of an infinite sample space are measurable and only the empty set gets assigned probability zero (in other words: the probability functions are regular). We use a non-Archimedean field as the range of the probability function. As a result, the property of countable additivity in Kolmogorov's axiomatization of probability is replaced by a different type of infinite additivity.</p

    Transitivity and partial screening off

    No full text
    The notion of probabilistic support is beset by well-known problems. In this paper we add a new one to the list: the problem of transitivity. Tomoji Shogenji has shown that positive probabilistic support, or confirmation, is transitive under the condition of screening off. However, under that same condition negative probabilistic support, or disconfirmation, is intransitive. Since there are many situations in which disconfirmation is transitive, this illustrates, but now in a different way, that the screening-off condition is too restrictive. We therefore weaken this condition to what we call ‘partial’ screening off. We show that the domain defined by partial screening off comprises two mutually exclusive subdomains. In one subdomain disconfirmation is indeed transitive, but confirmation is then intransitive. In the other, confirmation is transitive, but here disconfirmation is once more intransitive

    De spagaat van de filosofie

    No full text

    L’essenza del Corpo:Spinoza e la scienza delle composizioni

    No full text

    The science of the soul:the commentary tradition on Aristotle’s De anima, c. 1260–c. 1360

    No full text

    Trustworthiness and moral character

    No full text

    Epistemic integrity in accounting:Accountants as Justifiers in Joint Epistemic A

    No full text
    Abstract: This paper presents an epistemological or knowledge-theoretic reinterpretation of the role of external accountants. It presents a joint epistemic agent model in which corporate management and accountants together form a source of testimonial knowledge for the firm's stakeholders about the firm's financial situation. Recent work from virtue epistemology is used, according to which knowledge is, roughly, true belief that is justified by way of the exercise of epistemic virtue. In the joint epistemic agent model, corporate management provides information, while the accountants ensure justification. The paper argues that to ensure justification, accountants hav to exercise self-regarding epistemic virtues such as open-mindedness, but also other regarding epistemic virtues such as generosity. It is also argued that these virtues are only partly encompassed in existing professional code

    77

    full texts

    34,936

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    Alberta Academic Review
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇