Alberta Academic Review
Not a member yet
    34936 research outputs found

    The Ockham-Burley dispute

    No full text

    Interview with Wolfgang Spohn

    No full text

    Arguments, Proofs, and Dialogues

    No full text

    How arbitrary are arbitrary public announcements?

    No full text

    Locke as a social externalist

    No full text

    Imagining the city: the difference that art makes

    No full text

    The epistemology of conditionals

    No full text

    The epistemology of de se beliefs

    No full text

    Inference to the Best Explanation, Dutch Books, and Inaccuracy Minimisation

    No full text
    Bayesians have traditionally taken a dim view of the Inference to the Best Explanation (IBE), arguing that, if IBE is at variance with Bayes' rule, then it runs afoul of the dynamic Dutch book argument. More recently, Bayes' rule has been claimed to be superior on grounds of conduciveness to our epistemic goal. The present paper aims to show that neither of these arguments succeeds in undermining IBE.</p

    77

    full texts

    34,936

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    Alberta Academic Review
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇