HOPE (Hauptbibliothek Open Publishing Environment)
Not a member yet
5698 research outputs found
Sort by
Milo Bernasconi, Une alliance éphémère: les relations de pouvoir entre les villes de Berne et de Lausanne, de la combourgeoisie à la sujétion (1525–1538), 2024
No full textNo abstract available.No abstract available
Riccarda Suitner, Venice and the Radical Reformation: Italian Anabaptism and Antitrinitarianism in European Context, 2024
No full textNo abstract available.No abstract available
Why, when and how are endodontically treated teeth restored: A questionnaire-based study comparing the decision-making of dentists in Germany and Switzerland
No full textPost-endodontic treatment preferences can be influenced by educational, healthcare, financial, and historical factors. This study aimed to compare the post-endodontic treatment choices – particularly post and single-crown placement – of dentists in Germany and Switzerland. From August to November 2023, a questionnaire was distributed amongst 334 Swiss and 570 German dentists. A total of 50 Swiss dentists (response rate: 15.0%) and 60 German dentists (response rate: 10.5%) completed the survey. Descriptive analyses were conducted, and data presented as percentages. German dentists reported placing posts in 5–20% of endodontically treated teeth, whereas most Swiss dentists did so in less than 5%. Swiss dentists (58%) tended to place posts in teeth with 0–40% remaining tooth structure, while German dentists (60%) began at 40–70%. Regarding post-endodontic restorations, the majority of German dentists (67%) preferred single crowns, whereas most Swiss dentists (68%) favored composite-resin fillings and maintained even teeth with severely reduced coronal hard tissue. These trends were further supported by responses to various clinical case scenarios
Beyond the discipline, beyond the institution: The outward reach of French Information and Communication Sciences (SIC) through the prism of editorial collaborations (2012–2018)
Get PDFThe internal interdisciplinarity of Information and Communication Sciences (Sciences de l’information et de la communication, SIC) in France has often been discussed in an effort to apprehend how various academic inputs and scholarly traditions have integrated to form SIC. However, the external interdisciplinarity of SIC, or cross-disciplinarity, i.e., its connections and collaborations with other disciplines, has received comparatively less attention. The present contribution seeks to address this gap through the prism of editorial collaborations. Our dataset consists of a list of collective publications covering the period 2012–2018, published in 2019 (Dynamiques des recherches en sciences de l’information et de la communication) under the coordination of the Permanent Conference of Directors of Research Units in Information and Communication Sciences (CPDirSIC). In this dataset, narrow interdisciplinarity is observed within France. Outside France, joint editorial endeavors mostly bring together researchers who are already located in the field of information-communication. The study also suggests the significance of linguistic proximity, with the majority of international collaborations concerning countries with French-speaking areas. Finally, the thematic area within SIC also plays a role in the way interdisciplinarity materializes. Given the limitations of the dataset, however, these findings should be interpreted with caution and must not be generalized or extrapolated beyond the specific scope of this study
Punishment and Socialization: Analyses and Debates on the Significance of Punitive Interventions in the Process of Becoming a Member of Society
No full textDas Prinzip Strafe und der Eingriff durch Strafen sind ubiquitäre und universale Konzepte und Praxen der Sozialisation. Der Prozess der Sozialisation in Gesellschaft, Familie wie auch der Schule ist von Strafe geprägt. Historisch wandelt sich dabei die Auffassung von Strafe wie auch die Erziehungs- und Sozialisationspraktiken des Strafens, und beide werden in Gegenwartsgesellschaften höchst konfliktär und polarisiert diskutiert. Wie Strafe erfolgt und was sie bezwecken soll, lässt dabei die gesellschaftlichen Ordnungen, den Zeitgeist wie Ideologien und Menschenbilder erkennen. Zentral ist in der Moderne wie auch in gegenwärtigen autoritären Erziehungsmodellen das Konzept der Punitivität, also die Bereitschaft und das Motiv, Abweichungen hart zu sanktionieren. Es prägt kriminologische Konzepte wie aber auch den sogenannten „punitive turn“ in der Sozialen Arbeit und konservative Vorstellungen von Erziehung und Bildung. Angesichts eines möglichen neuerlichen Aufschwungs infolge populistischer und revenchistischer Politiken wirft der Themenschwerpunkt einen Blick auf aktuelle Auseinandersetzungen und regt zur Diskussion an. Er stellt die Frage danach, wo und wie Strafen gegenwärtig im Sozialisationsprozess von Relevanz sind und welche Ambivalenzen und Kontroversen sich hieraus ergeben. Dazu setzt das Heft verschiedene erziehungswissenschaftliche Fokusse.The principle of punishment and the act of punishing are ubiquitous and universal concepts and practices within socialization. The process of socialization—in society, the family, and in schools—is shaped by punishment. Historically, both the understanding of punishment and the educational and socialization practices associated with it have undergone change, and both are subjects of highly contentious and polarized debate in contemporary societies. How punishment is enacted and what it is intended to achieve reflect societal orders, the spirit of the times, ideologies, and conceptions of humanity. Central to modern times—as well as to current authoritarian models of education—is the concept of punitiveness, that is, the willingness and motive to harshly sanction deviance. This concept influences criminological theories as well as the so-called \u27punitive turn\u27 in social work and conservative ideas about education and upbringing. In light of a potential resurgence driven by populist and revanchist politics, this thematic issue takes a closer look at current debates and aims to stimulate further discussion. It raises the question of where and how punishment currently plays a role in the socialization process and what ambivalences and controversies arise from this. To that end, the issue adopts various educational science perspectives
Editorial: Youth, Migration, Religion : How Can Research on This Still Be Conducted?
No full textDer (erziehungs-)wissenschaftliche Diskurs im Schnittfeld von Jugend, Migration und Religion ist von Essentialisierungen und Problematisierungen durchzogen. Vor dem Hintergrund der Verstrickung von Forschung in hegemoniale Verhältnisse ergibt sich die Frage, wie im besagten Themenschnittfeld machtsensibel geforscht werden kann. Hierzu sind Beiträge zusammengekommen, in denen sich die Autor*innen nicht nur mit der eigenen forscherischen Involvierung in Essentialisierungen und Problematisierungen befassen, sondern auch entlang ihrer konkreten Forschungspraxis methodologische Überlegungen anstellen, wie dieser Involvierung begegnet werden könnte. Das Themenschwerpunktheft versammelt daher Ideen möglicher Ausarbeitungen und konkreter Umsetzungen machtsensibler Forschungskonzeptionen. Ziel ist es, damit einen Beitrag zu einem methodologischen Diskurs über machtsensible Forschung zu leisten. Gleichzeitig sollen daraus Anregungen für Forschende entstehen, die sich aktiv mit ihrer eigenen wissenschaftlichen Involvierung auseinandersetzen und nach Lösungen in der konkreten Forschungspraxis suchen.The (educational) scholarly discourse at the intersection of youth, migration, and religion is permeated by essentializations and problematizations. Against the backdrop of research’s entanglement in hegemonic structures, the question arises of how research in this thematic field can be conducted with sensitivity to power dynamics. The contributions gathered here not only address the authors’ own involvement in producing essentializations and problematizations, but also, drawing on their concrete research practices, offer methodological reflections on how such involvement might be countered. This special issue thus brings together ideas for possible elaborations and practical implementations of power-sensitive research designs. Its aim is to contribute to a methodological discourse on power-sensitive research. At the same time, it seeks to offer impulses for researchers who engage critically with their own academic entanglements and look for solutions within their concrete research practice
Political Education for People with so-called Intellectual Disabilities: Specific Challenges of Professional Pedagogical Practice
No full textDer Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit pädagogischen Herausforderungen inklusiver politischer Bildungsarbeit. Er basiert auf der wissenschaftlichen Begleitung eines dreijährigen Projekts politischer Bildung für Menschen mit einer sogenannten geistigen Behinderung. Anhand empirischer Beispiele der qualitativen Studie wird gezeigt, wie strukturelle Status- und Machtasymmetrien in pädagogische Interaktionen hineinwirken, Fachkräfte das Spannungsfeld von Normalisierung von Behinderung und Inrechnungstellung von Differenz navigieren und unterschiedliche pädagogische Modi demokratische Erfahrungsräume eröffnen können.The article addresses pedagogical challenges in inclusive political education. It is based on research of a three-year political education project for people with so-called intellectual disabilities. Using empirical examples from the qualitative study, it demonstrates how structural asymmetries of status and power affect pedagogical interactions, how professionals navigate the tension between the normalization of disability and the recognition of difference, and how various pedagogical modes can open up spaces for democratic experience
Conference report: « Institution Macht Erinnerung » (Institution Power Memory)
No full textAnfang April 2025 fand an der Universität Kassel die Tagung „Institution Macht Erinnerung – Forschung im Kontext gesellschaftlicher Aufarbeitungsprozesse“ statt. Entlang von sieben Beiträgen wurden die Zusammenhänge von Macht, Gewalt, Vulnerabilität und Selbstbestimmung in der Aufarbeitungsforschung diskutiert und Implikationen für die Forschungspraxis abgeleitet.At the beginning of April 2025, the conference ‘Institution Macht Erinnerung – Forschung im Kontext gesellschaftlicher Aufarbeitungsprozesse’ (Institution, Power, Memory – Research in the Context of Social Reappraisal Processes) took place at the University of Kassel. Seven presentations discussed the connections between power, violence, vulnerability and self-determination in reappraisal research and derived implications for research practice
An enriched, multimodal social media dataset of a UK General Election campaign
No full textThis article introduces a dataset of all posts by candidates during the 2024 General Election in the United Kingdom with a presence on the X (formerly Twitter) platform. The article relies on a crowd-sourcing innovation in the United Kingdom that, for the first time, provided researchers with early access to a regularly updated candidate list prior to the start of the election. This made it possible to collect real-time data on candidate posts for 1,604 candidates across 53 separate political parties. Additionally, we download and store 53,327 images and 15,982 videos posted within tweets. We enrich the data with the realized vote count and vote share for each candidate as well as text transcripts extracted from the audio of video posts. Overall, the dataset provides a uniquely comprehensive collection of online campaigning material for an election campaign and will be of considerable value to scholars of political communication, elections, and democratic responsiveness. We also analyze the topics and tone — focusing on negativity — across different media formats to identify patterns in the content and style of candidate communication across parties
