Septentrio Academic Publishing
Not a member yet
6415 research outputs found
Sort by
Siiddat ja siiddaolbmot Suoma sierralágain ja sierralágaid ovdabargguin
No full textDán artihkkalis dutkkan siiddaid ja siiddaolbmuid sajádaga Suoma iehčanasvuođa áigge (1917–) sierralágain ja sierralágaid ovdabargguin. Mu dutkan gažaldat lea makkár lea leamašan siiddaid, siiddaolbmuid ja sámiide mihtilmas ealáhusaid vuoigatvuođalaš sajádat dán áigodagas ja got dat oidno láhkaásaheamis ja láhkaásahanbarggus gitta otná beaivvi rádjai. Suoma iehčanasvuođa álgoáigge siiddaolbmuid riektesajádat namuhuvvui dávjá sierralágaid ovdabargguin, muhto ii dovddastuvvon ieš lágain. Sihke Sámi Parlameanta ja ovttaskas sámit geahččale maid 1970-logu loahpa bealde gitta 1990-logu álgui oažžut siiddaid sajádaga dovddastuvvot sierralágain. Dán áigodagas siiddat vuohon ihtigohte lágaid ovdabargguide, muhto eai ieš lágaide.
English title: Sámi siidas and siida people in the special laws and preliminary works of laws during the Finnish independence era
English abstract: My article aims to investigate the recognition of the legal status of siidas (Sámi villages) as collectives, along with their individual members, within the framework of special laws (lex specialis) and legislative preparations during the period of Finland’s independence (1917–). My research questions include: what was and is the legal status of siida and siida members in this era, how has the status changed and why. The region of focus for my research encompasses the Sámi homeland in Finland. During the initial years of Finnish independence, the legal standing of siida members were frequently mentioned in legislative proposals and other preparatory documents. However, the legislation that was enacted failed to acknowledge their status and rights. For example, the reindeer herding rights of the Sámi siida people have been extended to the descendants of Finnish settlers without a legal basis. Numerous efforts were made by individual Sámi individuals and the Sámi Parliament to seek recognition of the legal status of Sámi villages and their residents within the lex specialis.Dán artihkkalis dutkkan siiddaid ja siiddaolbmuid sajádaga Suoma iehčanasvuođa áigge (1917–) sierralágain ja sierralágaid ovdabargguin. Mu dutkan gažaldat lea makkár lea leamašan siiddaid, siiddaolbmuid ja sámiide mihtilmas ealáhusaid vuoigatvuođalaš sajádat dán áigodagas ja got dat oidno láhkaásaheamis ja láhkaásahanbarggus gitta otná beaivvi rádjai. Suoma iehčanasvuođa álgoáigge siiddaolbmuid riektesajádat namuhuvvui dávjá sierralágaid ovdabargguin, muhto ii dovddastuvvon ieš lágain. Sihke Sámi Parlameanta ja ovttaskas sámit geahččale maid 1970-logu loahpa bealde gitta 1990-logu álgui oažžut siiddaid sajádaga dovddastuvvot sierralágain. Dán áigodagas siiddat vuohon ihtigohte lágaid ovdabargguide, muhto eai ieš lágaide
Mangeromstuftene – en presentasjon
No full textSom følge av et omfattende arkeologisk forskningsprosjekt fra 2001–2005 har vi fått økt kunnskapen om mangeromstuftene. Her følger en oppsummering av grunnleggende kjennetegn ved fenomenet mangeromstufter, basert på forskningsprosjektets innledende resultater
Generativity, comparative grammar, and the syntax vs. the lexicon debates
Get PDFWithin linguistic theory, the division of labour between syntax and the lexicon has been a central issue for debate among different architectures of grammar, roughly corresponding to the distinction between memorization and rule governed aspects of language competence. In this article, I give some historical context for these debates, concluding that differences in architectural assumptions are only resolvable ultimately if we are willing to allow these implementational decisions to have consequences for (and make predictions concerning) human behaviours or mental processes. I proceed then to assess the psycholinguistic evidence concerning the lexicon and processing from the cognitive science literature, and offer a reassessment of what this means for the linguistic debates that have dominated discussions of the lexicon to this date. My conclusion will be that some of the comfortable dichotomies often relied on in these discussions are untenable and that some of the classical positions need to be reevaluated
”Det bästa svenska lustspel i fosterländsk anda”: : Hedvig von Numers pjäs På Gröna Lund och det kulturella minnet av den gustavianska perioden
No full textThe article constitutes a close study of the comic play På Gröna Lund (1856) by Hedvig von Numers, viewed as a significant contribution to the cultural memory of Sweden’s Gustavian era (1772-1809). Building on recent research into the workings of cultural memory, the play is studied from several complementary angles. To begin with, by studying the conditions of its staging and its reception by an audience, we investigate how a feeling of historical authenticity was created. In the next step, the historical content of the play is interpreted and contextualised by relating it to popular and scholarly historiography of the period, and by studying its use of comic conventions in the service of historical representation. Taken together, these approaches show the complex workings of nineteenth century memory culture when confronted with the recent Gustavian past.  
Ruth Hemstad, Jannicke S. Kaasa, Ellen Krefting and Aina Nøding (eds.), Literary Citizenship in Scandinavia in the Long Eighteenth Century (Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer, 2023). xii+330 pp.
No full text
Addressing epistemic injustices in species at risk assessments through improved credibility and legitimacy: case study of narwhal management in Ittoqqortoormiit
No full textThe regulation of seal and whale hunting in Kalaallit Nunaat (Greenland) belongs to the Naalakkersuisut (National Government), which is notably informed by the work of the Scientific Committee (SC) of the North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission (NAMMCO). Since 2004, quotas were set in Kalaallit Nunaat to regulate hunting practices and promote ecologically sustainable harvesting. In South East Greenland, the SC\u27s recommendations for the closure of the narwhal (Monodon monoceros or qialuar) hunt since 2019 has met both national disagreement and local resistance due to a desire to preserve the long-standing relation with narwhals organised around hunting, which is strongly intertwined within place-based communities’ experiences. The situation requires further attention to deploy an informed dialogue in the light of both available literature and local narratives capturing knowledge and values which are underrepresented within scientific discussions, as are social sciences. Grounded in repetitive and long-standing research fieldwork in Ittoqqortoormiit, and extensive qualitative data collection from 2019 to 2023, the article shows that community members express strong attachment and concern towards narwhal hunting together with the social, economic and cultural importance of mattak (narwhal skin). Local narratives also suggest that the resistance against limitations on narwhal hunting is not to be understood only as a conservatism that aims to preserve traditional hunting practices or about sustaining economic incomes for hunters, but in a significant way as protest against epistemic injustices, resulting from a feeling of being systematically unheard, distrusted and uninvolved in decision-making processes. Together with the expression of concern and attachment for narwhal hunting, the tensions between scientific knowledge and local value and knowledge were reiterated while shared concern for the preservation of the species is affirmed. We show that legitimacy and credibility of the scientific evidence and species management are contested. Ultimately, we ascertain the situation of epistemic injustices and raise the need to shift towards decolonial practices to open the possibility for the emergence of a fair and respectful dialogue that would support narwhal preservation, through securing hunters\u27 material living conditions, community food security, and ensuring consideration and respect is given to individual and collective immaterial dimensions associated with narwhal
Different paths to retaining rights in Europe
No full textThe lack of legal certainty surrounding intellectual property rights is one of the few remaining obstacles to the adoption of Open Science in the European Research Area. In particular, the legal aspects of sharing and reusing copyrighted scholarly works .
The proposed will delve into the findings from Project Retain, examining the ongoing development and implementation of rights retention in different legal, political, organisational and economical settings across Europe.
Led by SPARC Europe and part of the KR21 programme. The first phase of the project developed an overview of current approaches to author rights retention and open licensing resulting in a report published in June 2023. Interim results were shared at the Munin Conference 2022.
Our research draws on case studies from 10 European countries, highlighting varied approaches to rights retention and open licensing. We will highlight the dynamic interplay between legal systems, institutional practices, and stakeholders, and in particular, we will cover:
Variations in policies across jurisdictions and their relationship with laws, especially laws that are enacting secondary publishing rights,
The interplay between institutional policies, organisational settings, publisher relations, and legal frameworks,
Collaborative initiatives between institutions and different groups of stakeholders,
Systems and procedures put in place to support and monitor the uptake of policies,
Evolution of institutional policies and their impact on authors and scholarly communication.
We will conclude with a discussion of the value of case studies of this type, how to make them as vibrant as possible and more easily digestible and accessible to a wider group of potential agents.
See the presentation in this video recording
DOAJ: Advancing open access by fostering journal diversity through collaboration
No full textSince its creation in 2003, the mission of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) has been to increase the visibility of open-access, peer-reviewed scholarly journals, regardless of discipline, geography, or language.Initially, the DOAJ used a simple suggestion form consisting of five blank fields. The index started with a little more than 300 titles. Twenty years later, the DOAJ has become a reference in the scholarly ecosystem with more than 20,000 journals indexed. Over these 20 years, the application form and our criteria have evolved significantly alongside the shift to digital and the heterogeneous adoption of open science by the community and academic practices.But if Open Science itself has a heterogeneous adoption (due to technical complexity, lack of knowledge, lack of resources, and diversity of practices), how can we, the DOAJ, help foster diversity in our content? How has diversity evolved in our index? What is our approach?Since the beginning, our focus has been to work with and for the community, implementing changes as needed, to co-evolve with publishing practices and the scholarly community. In 2022, we officially committed to the Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI) and we collaborate with different organizations worldwide to discuss and develop principles that promote transparency and best practices in scholarly publishing. As the reputation of the DOAJ has evolved positively, so has our responsibility. That is why one of the core themes of our strategic goals for 2023-2025 is to advocate for equity and diversity in global access journal publishing.In this presentation, we will outline our approach to fostering diversity in our content.Where are we and what are we doing? We will cover different aspects, including the role of our worldwide team, the impact of our ambassador program, our academic and regional collaborations, and the diverse outputs and core texts we have produced to enhance diversity and equity.
See this presentation in this video recording
Collaborating for reproducibility: How can we work together better?
No full textTo address growing concerns about research integrity and reproducibility, stakeholders across the research ecosystem—including institutions, publishers, funders, researchers, and others—must collaborate more effectively across disciplines, regions, and contexts. Urgent issues include lack of transparency in reporting/data/analysis, lack of replication studies, publication bias, and questionable research practices. These are collective problems, requiring concerted responses across the research system from a variety of actors. How can institutions, publishers, funders, researchers and others collaborate better on these issues, across disciplines, regions and stakeholder contexts?
This workshop, inspired by ongoing collaborative efforts between Taylor & Francis and the EC-funded TIER2 project on reproducibility, seeks to stimulate open dialogue on cross-stakeholder action, individual roles and responsibilities, and current bottlenecks where further collaboration is needed. Attendees will gain insights into practical steps and collaborative strategies that can be implemented in funding, research and publishing workflows.
During the workshop, attendees will be invited to sit at one of 4 tables, each with a distinct thematic focus: (1) Infrastructure, tools and practices, (2) Awareness, training, and community-building, (3) Incentives, evaluation and assessment, (4) Policies and mandates