1,721,238 research outputs found
Does the Social Functioning Scale reflect real-life social functioning? An experience sampling study in patients with a non-affective psychotic disorder and healthy control individuals
The ecological validity of retrospective measures of social functioning is currently unknown in patients with schizophrenia. In the present study, patients with a diagnosis of non-affective psychosis were compared with controls on two measures of social functioning: the Social Functioning Scale (SFS) and daily-life measures collected with the Experience Sampling Methodology (ESM). The associations between both measures were examined in each group of participants to test for the ecological validity of the SFS.sponsorship: Inez Myin-Germeys was supported by an ERC consolidator grant (ERC-2012-StG, project 309767 - INTERACT). Ulrich Reininghaus was supported by a VENI grant of the Dutch Research Council (451-13-022). The infrastructure for the GROUP study is funded by the Geestkracht programme of the Dutch Health Research Council (ZON-MW, 10-000-1002) and matching funds from participating universities and mental health care organizations (Site Amsterdam: Academic Psychiatric Centre AMC, Ingeest, Arkin, Dijk en Duin, Rivierduinen, Erasmus MC, GGZ Noord Holland Noord; Site Utrecht: University Medical Centre Utrecht, Altrecht, Symfora, Meerkanten, Riagg Amersfoort, Delta; Site Groningen: University Medical Center Groningen, Lentis, GGZ Friesland, GGZ Drenthe, Dimence, Mediant, GGZ De Grote Rivieren and Parnassia Bavo Groep; Site Maastricht: Maastricht University Medical Center, GGZ Eindhoven en de Kempen, GGZ Midden-Brabant, GGZ Oost-Brabant, GGZ Noord-Midden Limburg, Mondriaan Zorggroep, Prins Clauscentrum Sittard, RIAGG Roermond, Universitair Centrum Sint-Jozef Kortenberg, CAPRI University of Antwerp, PC Ziekeren Sint-Truiden, PZ Sancta Maria Sint-Truiden, GGZ Overpelt, OPZ Rekem). The analyses were supported by a personal fellowship from the Swiss National Science Foundation (162006 to M. Schneider). (ERC|ERC-2012-StG, ERC|309767 - INTERACT, VENI grant of the Dutch Research Council|451-13-022, Geestkracht programme of the Dutch Health Research Council (ZON-MW)|10-000-1002, Site Amsterdam: Academic Psychiatric Centre AMC, Ingeest, Arkin, Dijk en Duin, Rivierduinen, Erasmus MC, GGZ Noord Holland Noord, Site Utrecht: University Medical Centre Utrecht, Altrecht, Symfora, Meerkanten, Riagg Amersfoort, Delta, Site Groningen: University Medical Center Groningen, Lentis, GGZ Friesland, GGZ Drenthe, Dimence, Mediant, GGZ De Grote Rivieren, Parnassia Bavo Groep, Site Maastricht: Maastricht University Medical Center, GGZ Eindhoven en de Kempen, GGZ Midden-Brabant, GGZ Oost-Brabant, GGZ Noord-Midden Limburg, Mondriaan Zorggroep, Prins Clauscentrum Sittard, RIAGG Roermond, Universitair Centrum Sint-Jozef Kortenberg, CAPRI University of Antwerp, PC Ziekeren Sint-Truiden, PZ Sancta Maria Sint-Truiden, GGZ Overpelt, OPZ Rekem, Swiss National Science Foundation|162006)status: Publishe
Smoking, symptoms, and quality of life in patients with psychosis, siblings, and healthy controls: a prospective, longitudinal cohort study.
Background
The self-medication hypothesis postulates that the high prevalence of smoking in patients with psychosis can be explained by the ameliorating effect of smoking on symptoms. However, there are few large prospective studies testing this hypothesis. We aimed to examine the multi-cross-sectional and prospective associations of changes in smoking behaviour with symptoms and quality of life.
Methods
In this prospective cohort study we recruited patients with a non-affective psychosis (n=1094), unaffected siblings (n=1047), and healthy controls (n=579). Patients aged between 16 and 50 years and diagnosed with a non-affective psychosis according to DSM-IV were recruited by clinicians from four university medical centres and 36 associated mental health-care institutions in the Netherlands and Belgium between Jan 13, 2004, and March 6, 2014. Smoking status and number of cigarettes per day were assessed at baseline, and at 3-year and 6-year follow-up using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Symptom frequency was self-rated with the Community Assessment of Psychotic Experience (CAPE), and quality of life was assessed by the WHO Quality of Life (WHOQOL) schedule. Multiple linear mixed-effects regression analyses were done accounting for multiple confounders.
Findings
At baseline, 729 (67%) of 1094 of patients smoked (mean 17·5 cigarettes per day, SD 8·8) compared with 401 (38%) of 1047 siblings and 145 (25%) of 579 healthy controls. Multi-cross-sectional results of linear mixed-effects analyses showed that smoking in patients and siblings was associated with more frequent positive symptoms (estimate 0·14, SE 0·02, p<0·0001 in patients; 0·03, 0·01, p=0·0019 in siblings), negative symptoms (0·15, 0·03, p<0·0001 in patients; 0·09, 0·02, p<0·0001 in siblings), and depressive symptoms (0·12, 0·03 p<0·0001 in patients; 0·08, 0·02 p<0·0001 in siblings) and lower quality of life (−0·59, 0·11, p<0·0001 in patients; −0·31, 0·09, p=0·0002 in siblings) than non-smokers. In controls, smoking was associated with significantly higher frequency of subclinical positive symptoms (0·03, 0·01, p=0·0016) and depressive symptoms (0·05, 0·03, p=0·0432) than in participants who did not smoke. Patients who started to smoke during follow-up showed a significant increase in self-reported symptoms, particularly positive symptoms (0·161, 0·077, p=0·0381), whereas smoking cessation was not associated with changes in symptoms or quality of life compared with those who showed no change in smoking behaviour. Similar results were obtained for the changes in the number of cigarettes smoked.
Interpretation
Our findings do not empirically support the self-medication hypothesis. The absence of long-term symptomatic relief from smoking should encourage clinicians to help patients with psychosis to quit smoking.sponsorship: The infrastructure for the GROUP study is funded through the Geestkracht programme of the Dutch Health Research Council (ZonMw, grant number 10-000-1001) and matching funds from participating pharmaceutical companies (Lundbeck, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Janssen Cilag) and universities and mental health-care organisations (Academic Psychiatric Center of Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef, and the mental health institutions GGZ inGeest, Arkin, Dijk en Duin, GGZ Rivierduinen, Erasmus Medical Center, GGZ Noord Holland Noord; University Medical Center Groningen, and the mental health institutions Lentis, GGZ Friesland, GGZ Drenthe, Dimence, Mediant, GGNet Warnsveld, Yulius Dordrecht, and Parnassia psycho-medical center, The Hague; Maastricht University Medical Center and the mental health institutions GGzE, GGZ Breburg, GGZ Oost-Brabant, Vincent van Gogh voor Geestelijke Gezondheid, Mondriaan, Virenze riagg, Zuyderland GGZ, MET ggz, Universitair Centrum Sint-Jozef Kortenberg, CAPRI University of Antwerp, PC Ziekeren Sint-Truiden, PZ Sancta Maria Sint-Truiden, GGZ Overpelt, OPZ Rekem; University Medical Center Utrecht and the mental health institutions Altrecht, GGZ Centraal, and Delta). We are grateful for the generosity of time and effort by the patients, their families, and healthy participants. We thank all research personnel involved in the GROUP project, in particular Joyce van Baaren, Erwin Veermans, Truda Driesen, Karin Pos, Erna van't Hag, and Jessica de Nijs. (Dutch Health Research Council (ZonMw)|10-000-1001, AstraZeneca, Lundbeck, Eli Lilly, Janssen Cilag, Academic Psychiatric Center of Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef, GGZ inGeest, Dijk en Duin, GGZ Rivierduinen, Erasmus Medical Center, GGZ Noord Holland Noord, University Medical Center Groningen, GGZ Friesland, GGZ Drenthe, Dimence, Mediant, GGNet Warnsveld, Yulius Dordrecht, Parnassia psycho-medical center, The Hague, Maastricht University Medical Center, GGzE, GGZ Breburg, GGZ Oost-Brabant, Vincent van Gogh voor Geestelijke Gezondheid, Virenze riagg, Zuyderland GGZ, MET ggz, Universitair Centrum Sint-Jozef Kortenberg, CAPRI University of Antwerp, PC Ziekeren Sint-Truiden, PZ Sancta Maria Sint-Truiden, GGZ Overpelt, OPZ Rekem, University Medical Center Utrecht, Altrecht, GGZ Centraal, Delta, Arkin, Mondriaan, Lentis)status: Publishe
The validity of the DSM-IV diagnostic classification system of non-affective psychoses
Objective: The schizophrenia and other non-affective disorders categories listed in the DSM-IV, are currently under revision for the development of the fifth edition. The aim of the present study is to demonstrate the validity of these categories by investigating possible differences between diagnostic patient subgroups on various measures. Methods: 1064 patients with a diagnosis of non-affective psychosis (schizophrenia N = 731 (paranoid type 82%), schizoaffective N = 63, schizophreniform N = 120, psychosis not otherwise specified/brief psychotic disorder N = 150) participated in this study. Dependent variables were demographic and clinical characteristics, severity of psychopathology, premorbid and current functioning, and indicators of quality of life. Results: Within the diagnostic group of schizophrenia, no significant differences were observed between paranoid schizophrenia, disorganized, and undifferentiated schizophrenia. Patients with schizophrenia experienced more severe psychopathology and had poorer levels of current functioning compared to patients with psychosis not otherwise specified or brief psychotic disorder. Differences between schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder were less clear. Conclusion: Our results do not support the validity of schizophrenia subtypes. Schizophrenia can be distinguished from brief psychotic disorder and psychotic disorder not otherwise specified. These findings may fuel the actual DSM-V discussion
Childhood adversities and psychotic symptoms: The potential mediating or moderating role of neurocognition and social cognition.
INTRODUCTION: Childhood abuse and neglect are risk factors for psychotic symptoms. Early adversities may contribute to alterations in neuro/social cognition, which in turn is associated with psychosis. This study explored the possible mediating/moderating role of neuro/social cognition between childhood abuse and neglect on the one hand, and psychotic symptoms on the other. METHOD: The sampling frame was 1.119 patients with a psychotic disorder. Childhood adversity was evaluated with the Dutch version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Psychotic symptoms were assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Verbal learning-memory, attention-vigilance, working memory, information processing speed, reasoning-problem solving were evaluated as measures of neurocognition using the Word Learning Task, the Continuous Performance Test, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 3rd. Mentalization was evaluated as a measure of social cognition using the Hinting Task. Correlation, mediation, moderation, 95% Bias Corrected and accelerated (BCaCI) bootstrapped analyses were performed, considering possible sex differences. RESULTS: In male psychotic patients, attention and vigilance mediated the association between childhood neglect and negative symptoms (indirect effect: 0.18, BCaCI: 0.03-0.54), disorganization (indirect effect: 0.26, BCaCI: 0.05-0.61), excitement (indirect effect: 0.07, BCaCI: 0.004-0.23); mentalization mediated the association between childhood neglect and negative symptoms (indirect effect: 0.21, BCaCI: 0.02-0.51), excitement (indirect effect: 0.07, BCaCI: 0.01-0.20) disorganization (indirect effect: 0.29, BCaCI: 0.02-0.64); working memory mediated the association between childhood abuse and disorganization (indirect effect: 0.28, BCaCI: 0.05-0.57), excitement (indirect effect: 0.08, BCaCI: 0.01-0.20), emotional distress (indirect effect: 0.10, BCaCI: 0.01-0.27). DISCUSSION: In psychotic disorder, sex-specific mediation of neurocognition and mentalization may exist in the association between childhood adversity and psychotic symptoms.sponsorship: The infrastructure for the GROUP study is funded through the Geestkracht programme of the Dutch Health Research Council (ZonMw, grant number 10-000-1001), and matching funds from participating pharmaceutical companies (Lundbeck, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Janssen Cilag) and universities and mental health care organizations (Amsterdam: Academic Psychiatric Centre of the Academic Medical Center and the mental health institutions: GGZ Ingeest, Arkin, Dijk en Duin, GGZ Rivierduinen, Erasmus Medical Centre, GGZ Noord Holland Noord. Groningen: University Medical Center Groningen and the mental health institutions: Lentis, GGZ Friesland, GGZ Drenthe, Dimence, Mediant, GGNet Warnsveld, Yulius Dordrecht and Parnassia psycho-medical center The Hague. Maastricht: Maastricht University Medical Centre and the mental health institutions: GGZ Eindhoven en De Kempen, GGZ Breburg, GGZ Oost-Brabant, Vincent van Gogh voor Geestelijke Gezondheid, Mondriaan, Virenze riagg, Zuyderland GGZ, MET ggz, Universitair Centrum Sint-Jozef Kortenberg, CAPRI University of Antwerp, PC Ziekeren Sint-Truiden, PZ Sancta Maria Sint-Truiden, GGZ Overpelt, OPZ Rekem. Utrecht: University Medical Center Utrecht and the mental health institutions Altrecht, GGZ Centraal and Delta.) (Geestkracht programme of the Dutch Health Research Council (ZonMw)|10-000-1001, Lundbeck, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Janssen Cilag, Amsterdam: Academic Psychiatric Centre of the Academic Medical Center, GGZ Ingeest, Arkin, Dijk en Duin, GGZ Rivierduinen, Erasmus Medical Centre, GGZ Noord Holland Noord, Groningen: University Medical Center Groningen, Lentis, GGZ Friesland, GGZ Drenthe, Dimence, Mediant, GGNet Warnsveld, Yulius Dordrecht, Parnassia psycho-medical center The Hague, Maastricht: Maastricht University Medical Centre, GGZ Eindhoven en De Kempen, GGZ Breburg, GGZ Oost-Brabant, Vincent van Gogh voor Geestelijke Gezondheid, Mondriaan, Virenze riagg, Zuyderland GGZ, MET ggz, Universitair Centrum Sint-Jozef Kortenberg, CAPRI University of Antwerp, PC Ziekeren Sint-Truiden, PZ Sancta Maria Sint-Truiden, GGZ Overpelt, OPZ Rekem, Utrecht: University Medical Center Utrecht, Altrecht, GGZ Centraal, Delta)status: Publishe
Change in IQ in schizophrenia patients and their siblings: a controlled longitudinal study
BACKGROUND: Lower intelligence quotient (IQ) has frequently been reported in patients with schizophrenia. However, it is unclear whether IQ declines (further) after illness onset and what the familial contribution is to this change. Therefore, we investigate IQ changes during the course of illness in patients with non-affective psychosis, their siblings and controls. METHODS: Data are part of the longitudinal Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis (GROUP) study in the Netherlands and Belgium. Participants underwent three measurements, each approximately 3 years apart. A total of 1022 patients with non-affective psychosis [illness duration: 4.34 (s.d. = 4.50) years], 977 of their siblings, and 565 controls had at least one measure of IQ (estimated from four subtests of the WAIS-III). RESULTS: At baseline, IQ was significantly lower in patients (IQ = 97.8) and siblings (IQ = 108.2; p < 0.0001) than in controls (IQ = 113.0; p < 0.0001), and in patients as compared with siblings (p < 0.0001). Over time, IQ increased in all groups. In siblings, improvement in IQ was significantly more pronounced (+0.7 points/year) than in patients (+0.5 points/year; p < 0.0001) and controls (+0.3 points/year; p < 0.0001). IQ increase was not significantly correlated with improvement in (sub)clinical outcome in any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: During the first 10 years of the illness, IQ increases to a similar (and subtle) extent in a relatively high-functioning group of schizophrenia patients and controls, despite the lower IQ in patients at baseline. In addition, the siblings' IQ was intermediate at baseline, but over time the increase in IQ was more pronounced.sponsorship: We thank the Geestkracht programme of the Dutch Health Research Council (ZonMw, grant number 10-000-1001) for funding the infrastructure for the GROUP study, and participating pharmaceutical companies (Lundbeck, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, and Janssen Cilag) and universities and mental health care organizations (Amsterdam: Academic Psychiatric Centre of the Academic Medical Center and the mental health institutions: GGZ Ingeest, Arkin, Dijk en Duin, GGZ Rivierduinen, Erasmus Medical Centre, GGZ Noord Holland Noord. Groningen: University Medical Center Groningen and the mental health institutions: Lentis, GGZ Friesland, GGZ Drenthe, Dimence, Mediant, GGNet Warnsveld, Yulius Dordrecht and Parnassia psycho-medical center The Hague. Maastricht: Maastricht University Medical Centre and the mental health institutions: GGZ Eindhoven en De Kempen, GGZ Breburg, GGZ Oost-Brabant, Vincent van Gogh voor Geestelijke Gezondheid, Mondriaan, Virenze riagg, Zuyderland GGZ, MET ggz, Universitair Centrum Sint-Jozef Kortenberg, CAPRI University of Antwerp, PC Ziekeren Sint-Truiden, PZ Sancta Maria Sint-Truiden, GGZ Overpelt, OPZ Rekem. Utrecht: University Medical Center Utrecht and the mental health institutions Altrecht, GGZ Centraal and Delta) for matching funds. This paper has been presented at the SIRS meeting 14-18 April 2012, Florence, Italy, and at the ICOSR meeting 21-25 April 2013, Orlando, Florida, USA. (Geestkracht programme of the Dutch Health Research Council (ZonMw)|10-000-1001, Lundbeck, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Janssen Cilag, Amsterdam: Academic Psychiatric Centre of the Academic Medical Center, GGZ Ingeest, Arkin, Dijk en Duin, GGZ Rivierduinen, Erasmus Medical Centre, GGZ Noord Holland Noord, Groningen: University Medical Center Groningen, Lentis, GGZ Friesland, GGZ Drenthe, Dimence, Mediant, GGNet Warnsveld, Yulius Dordrecht, Parnassia psycho-medical center The Hague, Maastricht: Maastricht University Medical Centre, GGZ Eindhoven en De Kempen, GGZ Breburg, GGZ Oost-Brabant, Vincent van Gogh voor Geestelijke Gezondheid, Mondriaan, Virenze riagg, Zuyderland GGZ, MET ggz, Universitair Centrum Sint-Jozef Kortenberg, CAPRI University of Antwerp, PC Ziekeren Sint-Truiden, PZ Sancta Maria Sint-Truiden, GGZ Overpelt, OPZ Rekem, Utrecht: University Medical Center Utrecht, Altrecht, GGZ Centraal, Delta)status: Publishe
Association between schizophrenia and both loss of function and missense mutations in paralog conserved sites of voltage-gated sodium channels
AbstractSequencing studies have highlighted candidate sets of genes involved in schizophrenia, including activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (ARC) and N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) complexes. Two genes, SETD1A and RBM12, have also been associated with robust statistical evidence. Larger samples and novel methods for identifying disease-associated missense variants are needed to reveal novel genes and biological mechanisms associated with schizophrenia. We sequenced 187 genes, selected for prior evidence of association with schizophrenia, in a new dataset of 5,207 cases and 4,991 controls. Included were members of ARC and NMDAR post-synaptic protein complexes, as well as voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels. We observed a significant case excess of rare (<0.1% in frequency) loss-of-function (LoF) mutations across all 187 genes (OR = 1.36; Pcorrected = 0.0072) but no individual gene was associated with schizophrenia after correcting for multiple testing. We found novel evidence that LoF and missense variants at paralog conserved sites were enriched in sodium channels (OR = 1.26; P = 0.0035). Meta-analysis of our new data with published sequencing data (11,319 cases, 15,854 controls and 1,136 trios) supported and refined this association to sodium channel alpha subunits (P = 0.0029). Meta-analysis also confirmed association between schizophrenia and rare variants in ARC (P = 4.0 × 10−4) and NMDAR (P = 1.7 × 10−5) synaptic genes. No association was found between rare variants in calcium channels and schizophrenia.In one of the largest sequencing studies of schizophrenia to date, we provide novel evidence that multiple voltage-gated sodium channels are involved in schizophrenia pathogenesis, and increase the evidence for association between rare variants in ARC and NMDAR post-synaptic complexes and schizophrenia. Larger samples are required to identify specific genes and variants driving these associations.Author SummaryCommon and rare genetic variations are known to play a substantial role in the development of schizophrenia. Recently, sequencing studies have started to highlight specific sets of genes that are enriched for rare variation in schizophrenia, such as the synaptic gene sets ARC and NMDAR, as well as voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels. To confirm the role of these gene sets in schizophrenia, and identify specific risk genes, we sequenced 187 genes in a new sample of 5,207 schizophrenia cases and 4,991 controls. We find an excess of protein truncating mutations with a frequency <0.1% in all 187 targeted genes, and provide novel evidence that mutations altering amino acids conserved across sodium channel proteins are risk factors for schizophrenia. Through meta-analysing our new data with previously published sequencing data sets, for a total of 11,319 cases, 15,854 controls and 1,136 trios, we increase the evidence for association between rare coding variants and schizophrenia in voltage-gated sodium channels, as well as in synaptic gene sets ARC and NMDAR. Although no individual gene was associated with schizophrenia, these findings suggest larger studies will identify the specific genes driving these associations.</jats:sec
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Aetiological stratification as a conceptual framework for gene-by-environment interaction research in psychiatry
It has been argued that gene-by-environment interactions (GxE) research is unlikely to progress knowledge about psychiatric disorders, in contrast to genome-wide association (GWA) studies. However, GxE approaches are not alternatives for gene-hunting but a way to identify genetic and biological mechanisms within subgroups of patients exposed to a similar aetiological (environmental) factor via a process of aetiological stratification'. This is important as diagnostic categories targeted by GWA studies are inherently heterogeneous and lack biological validity. Aetiological stratification builds on examining possible phenotypic and/or molecular specificity associated with exposure to the environmental factor across multiple potentially relevant disorders, combined with efforts to identify an underlying biological substrate. GxE hypotheses within this framework investigate (1) which genes influence the degree to which individuals develop identified biological alterations that link environmental exposure to specific phenotypic and/or molecular characteristics within or across psychiatric disorders and (2) which genes are implicated in determining the development of psychopathology once this biological alteration has been brought about. As gene-hunting is not a goal in itself, the examination of pathway and/or polygenic risk scores may be more informative than the examination of individual markers, at the same time reducing multiple testing and the associated risk of spurious findings
- …
