1,721,018 research outputs found
Civil Litigation in Belgium : the Reconstruction of the Pyramid of Legal Disputes — a preliminary report
No full textThe aim of the article is to reconstruct the pyramid of legal disputes in Belgium. The data for the study are gathered by means of a representative sample of 506 households. First, the article explores the theoretical and conceptual aspects of the dispute pyramid model. Then, the pyramid has been reconstructed empirically. We found a pyramid showing high percentages of informal dispute resolution an a high drop-out rate before the stage of the court filing.Le but de cet article est de reconstruire la pyramide des conflits juridiques en Belgique. Les données de cette étude sont tirées d'une enquête réalisée à partir d'un échantillon représentatif de 506 familles. L'article explore d'abord les aspect théoriques et conceptuels de la pyramide juridique. La pyramide a été ensuite reconstruite empiriquement. Nous avons trouvé un pourcentage élevé de solutions informelles des conflits. Le nombre de familles qui se retirent dans la dernière phase, c'est-à-dire juste avant la démarche au tribunal, est également élevé.Wouters Yolande, Van Loon Francis. Civil Litigation in Belgium : the Reconstruction of the Pyramid of Legal Disputes — a preliminary report. In: Droit et société, n°20-21, 1992. Une science sociale pour la pratique juridique ? pp. 199-210
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
60 maal recht en 1 maal wijn: rechtssociologie , sociale problemen en justitieel beleid. Liber amicorum prof. dr. Jean Van Houtte
No full textDe toekomst van de rechtssociologie in het justitieel beleid: bijdragen voor de jaarvergadering van de Vereniging voor de Sociaal-Wetenschappelijke besturing van het Recht, 13 en 14 december 2001, UFSIA - Universiteit Antwerpen
No full text- …
