3,589,012 research outputs found

    AKSW/LLM-KG-Bench: 1.1.0

    No full text
    <p>release for DL4KG 2023 Turtle KG evaluation paper submission</p&gt

    liseda-lab/KATY-KG: KATY-KG

    No full text
    <p>This is release 3.0 of the KATY KG data files.</p> <p>The data annotation files for the KATY KG are divided into zipped folders according to whether they were obtained through proteogenomics or transcriptomics assays; </p> <p>The "mappings" folder contains data mappings to some of the ontologies that compose the backbone of the KG and to external data sources;</p> <p>Please confirm you are accessing the latest version of the dataset.</p&gt

    liseda-lab/KATY-KG: KATY-KG

    No full text
    <p>This is release 3.0 of the KATY KG data files.</p> <p>The data annotation files for the KATY KG are divided into zipped folders according to whether they were obtained through proteogenomics or transcriptomics assays; </p> <p>The "mappings" folder contains data mappings to some of the ontologies that compose the backbone of the KG and to external data sources;</p> <p>Please confirm you are accessing the latest version of the dataset.</p&gt

    liseda-lab/KATY-KG: KATY-KG

    No full text
    <p>This is an older version of release 3.0 the KATY KG data files.</p> <p>The data annotation files for the KATY KG divided into zipped folders according to whether they were obtained through proteogenomics or transcriptomics assays; </p> <p>The "mappings" folder contains data mappings to some of the ontologies that compose the backbone (see the "ontologies" folder) of the KG and to external data sources;</p> <p>Please confirm you are accessing the latest version of the dataset.</p&gt

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    liseda-lab/KATY-KG: KATY-KG

    No full text
    <p>This release contains the data annotation files for the KATY KG divided into zipped folders according to whether they were obtained through proteogenomics or transcriptomics assays.</p> <p>Please see the latest version of the dataset.</p&gt

    liseda-lab/KATY-KG: KATY-KG

    No full text
    <p>This release contains the data annotation files for the KATY KG divided into zipped folders according to whether they were obtained through proteogenomics or transcriptomics assays and a second transcriptomics folder with gene expression data.</p> <p>Please see the latest version of the dataset.</p&gt
    corecore