1,720,958 research outputs found
Dalla Cultura del rischio al Rischio di cultura. Strumenti di Governance Comportamenti e Valori.
No full textIl saggio esamina la distinzione concettuale e operativa tra “cultura del rischio” (risk culture), intesa come l’insieme di norme condivise e comportamenti che guidano negli intermediari finanziari un’assunzione di rischio responsabile, e “rischio di cultura” (culture risk), definito come la minaccia derivante dalla divergenza tra i valori istituzionali dichiarati e le prassi effettive. L’analisi inquadra il culture risk quale vulnerabilità trasversale con ricadute di natura sia prudenziale sia reputazionale. Attraverso una prospettiva articolata che integra governance e logiche di controllo interno, il lavoro delinea un quadro organico per la mitigazione del culture risk. Vengono altresì proposti meccanismi operativi – quali indicatori chiave e protocolli di escalation – volti a radicare una risk culture resiliente all’interno delle strutture di governance. La Guida della European Central Bank (ECB, 2024) costituisce un passo significativo nell’evoluzione delle aspettative di vigilanza, segnando un chiaro spostamento verso l’istituzionalizzazione della cultura come fattore cruciale per la solidità prudenziale e l’integrità operativa. In risposta a questo mutato orizzonte regolamentare, il presente lavoro offre una riflessione sistematica sui fondamenti concettuali, sulle strutture di governance e sugli strumenti operativi necessari per promuovere la risk culture e contenere il culture risk. Inquadrando la risk culture come ambito governabile e il culture risk come minaccia trasversale alla stabilità istituzionale, lo studio intende supportare la comunità accademica ed il mondo dei practitioner nella comprensione e nell’implementazione delle aspettative delineate dalla ECB, proponendo una prima ricognizione del set di strumenti analitici e operativi, radicati tanto nella teoria quanto nelle best practice, per tradurre gli obiettivi culturali in risultati di governance duraturi. Ne risulta un framework olistico che valorizza la cultura come elemento centrale della gestione strategica e del dialogo tra la Vigilanza e gli istituti finanziari
4.4 La “condivisione”: un pilastro della cultura del rischio
No full textl Position Paper Governance e Risk Culture di AIFIRM affronta in modo organico il tema
“risk culture & culture risk”, delineando una visione olistica che integra prospettive
regolamentari, organizzative e operative. Il documento esordisce chiarendo la
differenza fra risk culture – l’insieme di valori, norme e comportamenti che orientano
l’assunzione consapevole dei rischi – e culture risk, ossia il rischio generato da un
divario fra i principi dichiarati e le pratiche effettive dell’organizzazione. Senza una
solida cultura del rischio, il culture risk diventa un fattore potenzialmente letale per la
sostenibilità dell’intermediario
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
