711,124 research outputs found
EDITORIAL ARTICLE
No full textRETRACTED ARTICLE DUE TO EXCESSIVE SELF-CITATION:Khalilov M.B., Zhuk A.F., Aytemirov A.A., Gayrabekova R.K. TAKING VARIOUS AGROTECHNICAL MEASURES FOR THE PRESERVATION AND ACCUMULATION OF MOISTURE. South of Russia: ecology, development. 2016;11(2):152-159. (In Russ.) DOI:10.18470/1992- 1098-2016-2-152-15
Retraction of the article: Muraviev Yu., Gridneva G. Herpes zoster in RA patient treated with methotrexat
No full textRetracted article: Muraviev Yu., Gridneva G. Herpes Zoster in RA Patient treated with Methotrexate. Safety and Risk of Pharmacotherapy. 2014;(4):18–22. (In Russ.)This article by Muraviev Yu., Gridneva G. has been retracted (i.e. withdrawn from the press) by the editorial staff of Safety and Risk of Pharmacotherapy as a duplicate of the following publication: Muraviev Yu., Gridneva G. Herpes Zoster in RA Patient treated with Methotrexate. Safety and Risk of Pharmacotherapy. 2014;(1):27–30 (In Russ.)The Editorial board would like to extend their sincere apologies for any inconvenience this retraction may have caused.Minutes of the meeting of the Editorial Board of the journal Safety and Risk of Pharmacotherapy No. 2 of April 21, 2022
Tendencia Editorial UR
No full textEn este nuevo número dedicado a la Ciencia Abierta, encuentra las siguientes contribuciones: Reflexión: Una Ciencia Abierta por Diego A. Garzon-Forero. - Al encuentro con: ¿Cómo encaja la edición universitaria en la Ciencia Abierta? Editorial UPV, un ejemplo de adaptación al nuevo escenario por Reme Pérez García. -Ciencia abierta ¿para qué y para quiénes? por Salim Chalela Naffah Ph. D. La ciencia común como bien público por Antonio Lafuente y Adolfo Estalella. - Actualidad: Recomendados de nuestro Fondo Editorial.In this new Issue dedicated to Open Science, find the following contributions: Reflection: An Open Science by Diego A. Garzon-Forero. - Meeting with: How does the university edition fit into Open Science? Editorial UPV, an example of adaptation to the new scenario by Reme Pérez García. -Open science, for what and for whom? By Salim Chalela Naffah Ph. D. Common science as a public good by Antonio Lafuente and Adolfo Estalella. - News: Recommended from our Editorial Fund
Addendum: Impolite Communication Practices as a Community-Building Tool in Sports News Comments
No full textThe Editorial Office of SibScript would like to report about the addition of information in the published article: Shulginov V. A., Alyansky K. A. Impolite Communication Practices as a Community-Building Tool in Sports News Comments. SibScript, 2023, 25(4): 481–490. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/ sibscript-2023-25-4-481-490The affiliation of the author Valery A. Shulginov supplemented with information about the second organization: Pushkin State Russian Language Institute, Russia, Moscow. The manuscript will be updated and the original will remain available on the article webpage
Editorial of Editor-in-Chief
No full textWelcome to Volume 2 of Professional Discourse & Communication – the platform that provides researchers and practitioners with the most up-to-date comprehensive and important research in the sphere of professional communication, paying special attention to modern linguistic approaches as well as the perspective of teaching methodology and acquisition of foreign languages for specific purposes. PDC’s editorial board hopes to continue to promote well-written high-quality papers with broad appeal, publishing theoretical overviews, research articles, viewpoint essays, book reviews and conference reports to inform readers about the latest trends and news within the topical scope of the journal
The Quest for Citations: Drivers of Article Impact
No full textWhy do some articles become building blocks for future scholars, while many others remain unnoticed? We aim to answer this question by contrasting, synthesizing and simultaneously testing three scientometric perspectives – universalism, social constructivism and presentation – on the influence of article and author characteristics on article citations. To do so, we study all articles published in a sample of five major journals in marketing from 1990 to 2002 that are central to the discipline. We count the number of citations each of these articles has received and regress this count on an extensive set of characteristics of the article (i.e. article quality, article domain, title length, the use of attention grabbers and expositional clarity), and the author (i.e. author visibility and author personal promotion). We find that the number of citations an article in the marketing discipline receives, depends upon “what one says†(quality and domain), on “who says it†(author visibility and personal promotion) and not so much on “how one says it†(title length, the use of attention grabbers, and expositional clarity). Our insights contribute to the marketing literature and are relevant to scientific stakeholders, such as the management of scientific journals and individual academic scholars, as they strive to maximize citations. They are also relevant to marketing practitioners. They inform practitioners on characteristics of the academic journals in marketing and their relevance to decisions they face. On the other hand, they also raise challenges towards making our journals accessible and relevant to marketing practitioners: (1) authors visible to academics are not necessarily visible to practitioners; (2) the readability of an article may hurt academic credibility and impact, while it may be instrumental in influencing practitioners; (3) it remains questionable whether articles that academics assess to be of high quality are also managerially relevant.Impact;Citation Analysis;Referencing;Scientometrics;Cite
- …
