1,720,974 research outputs found
Management of cervical cerclage after preterm premature rupture of membranes: an argument for removal
Cervical cerclage is a widely used intervention to prevent preterm birth in high-risk pregnancies. However, cerclage is associate with risks, including preterm premature rupture of membranes and subsequent complications, such as chorioamnionitis. Our review evaluates the evidence for immediate removal (ie, removal at the time of diagnosis) vs retention of cervical cerclage (ie, removal when clinically indicated) after preterm premature rupture of membranes, focusing on optimizing neonatal outcomes and minimizing maternal and fetal complications. A meta-analysis on the topic that included 169 patients in the “removal” group and 208 in the “retention” group showed that the rates of pregnancy prolongation >48 hours and >7 days were significantly lower in the group who underwent immediate removal of cerclage than in the group who had delayed removal of cerclage (pregnancy prolongation >48 hours: 47% vs 85%, respectively; odds ratio, 0.15; pregnancy prolongation >7 days: 33% vs 57%, respectively; odds ratio, 0.30). In addition, pregnancy latency was significantly lower, despite the absolute mean difference being only 2.84 days. However, the rates of chorioamnionitis and Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes were significantly lower in the immediate removal group than in the retention group (chorioamnionitis: 29% vs 41%, respectively; odds ratio, 0.57; Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes: 16% vs 43%, respectively; odds ratio, 0.22). A proposed balanced approach involves retaining the cerclage for approximately 24 hours after premature rupture of membranes (PROM) to permit steroid administration (initial dose followed by a second dose after 24 hours) before removal. This strategy aims to maximize steroid benefits while minimizing the risks of prolonged cerclage retention, potentially achieving a correct timing that optimizes neonatal outcomes without significantly increasing complications This management approach could be beneficial in situations where immediate removal may preclude full steroid benefits. Our recommendations support a protocol balancing appropriate timing for steroid administration with the risks of extended cerclage retention, namely, chorioamnionitis, unless further randomized controlled trials will show the proper evidence-based management in this clinical scenario
Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine in pregnant women: not so far! The importance of counseling and the need for evidence-based data
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Risk of spontaneous preterm birth in IVF-conceived twin pregnancies
OBJECTIVE:
To compare the mean transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) cervical length (CL) at midtrimester in screening for preterm birth in in vitro (IVF)-conceived twin pregnancies versus spontaneously-conceived twin pregnancies.
METHODS:
This was a retrospective cohort study. Potential study subjects were identified at the time of a routine second trimester fetal ultrasound exam at 18 0/7 to 23 6/7-week gestation. All women with twin diamniotic pregnancies screened with a single TVU CL for this trial were included. Mean TVU CLs were compared between IVF-conceived twin pregnancies and spontaneously-conceived twin pregnancies. The relationship of TVU CL with gestational age at delivery was assessed. Incidence of short TVU CL, defined as TVU CL ≤30 mm, was also calculated in the two groups. The primary outcome was the mean of TVU CL. Distribution of CL was determined and normality was examined in both groups Results: A total of 668 women with diamniotic twin pregnancies who underwent TVU CL screening between 18 0/6 and 23 6/7 weeks were included. 158 (23.7%) were IVF-conceived pregnancies, and 510 (76.3%) were spontaneously-conceived pregnancies. No women received progesterone, pessary, or cerclage for preterm birth prevention during pregnancy. The mean TVU CL was significantly lower in the IVF-conceived group (32.2 ± 10.5 mm) compared to the spontaneously-conceived group (34.1 ± 9.1 mm) (mean difference (MD) - 1.90 mm, 95%CI -3.72 to -0.08). The incidence of TVU CL ≤30 mm was 30.4% in the IVF-conceived group and 21.6% in the spontaneously-conceived group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.59, 95%CI 1.06-2.37). IVF-conceived twins had a significantly higher risk of spontaneous preterm birth <34 weeks (32.9 versus 21.2%; aOR 1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-2.71) and higher rate of delivery due to spontaneous onset of labor (64.5 versus 54.9%; aOR 1.50, 95%CI 1.03-2.17). For any given TVU CL measured between 18 0-7 and 23 6/7 weeks, gestational age at delivery for IVF-conceived twins was earlier by about 1 week on average compared with spontaneously-conceived twins.
CONCLUSIONS:
The higher rate of spontaneous preterm birth in IVF-conceived twin pregnancies is predicted by lower midtrimester TVU CL, as well as by the lower gestational age at birth per any given CL in the IVF-conceived compared to the spontaneously-conceived twin pregnancies
Pregnancy after liver transplantation: a case series and review of the literature
Objective: To evaluate maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women after liver transplantation with a case series and literature systematic review. Methods: This was a single-center case-series study performed at University of Naples Federico II. All consecutive women with liver transplantation who reported pregnancy at our institution were included in a dedicated database. In addition, a systematic literature review was performed, including case series, population-based studies, and national registries, including maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with liver transplant. Studies with fewer than 10 cases and surveys were excluded. The primary outcome was perinatal death, defined as either stillbirth (defined as intrauterine fetal death after 20 weeks of gestation) or neonatal death (death of a live-born infant within the first 28 d of life). Results: During the study period, two women who underwent liver transplantation had a pregnancy in our Institution. Both of them underwent liver transplantation for biliary atresia at 1 year of age. One of them received cyclosporin as immunosuppressive regime during pregnancy, while the other one received tacrolimus. Both of them had a pregnancy with no major complications and delivered by cesarean section at term a baby with normal weight. One of them developed thrombocytopenia. Seventeen articles were included in this systematic review. Preterm birth at less than 37 weeks of gestations occurred in 279 women (33.6%). One-hundred women (14.9%) experienced preeclampsia, and 206 women (49.2%) delivered by cesarean delivery. Graft rejection related to pregnancy occurred in 73 women (8.3%). 117 women (12.9%) experienced miscarriage, and 22 (2.3%) IUFD. Fifty-two women (9.52%) underwent elective I-TOP. 195 fetuses (33.4%) were LBW. Eight neonatal deaths were recorded (1.3%). Conclusion: The maternal and perinatal outcome is usually favorable, but with an increased risk of preeclampsia, preterm birth, and perinatal morbidity and mortality. However, appropriate counseling about risks and complications is essential but women shouldn't be advised against pregnancy
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
