1,721,005 research outputs found

    All Arts Aspire to the Condition of Musicology: Victorian Musicology as Interdiscipline

    Get PDF
    This chapter traces the idea of an interdiscipline to Walter Pater’s famous adage ‘All art constantly aspires to the condition of music’. It utilizes Pater’s idea to identify the origin of Victorian musicology not as a discipline, but as an interdiscipline. According to the rules of anderstreben all art aspires to the condition of music because music is the only art that successfully collapses matter and form. In the construction of their interdiscipline Victorian musicologists, like Pater, would adopt ekphrasis as a methodological practice and anderstreben as a theoretical belief. For one thing Victorian musicologists struggled to understand and explain music’s purpose without reference to other disciplines, and in some instances disciplines like anthropology and theology seemed to hold mutually contradictory opinions, even if voiced through the same musicologist. The Victorian musicological subject defined himself or herself within a matrix of three intersecting areas of socio-cultural development: professionalization, education, and popularization

    Introduction

    No full text

    Evolution and Victorian art

    No full text
    pre-publicationBook Chapte

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore