1,720,956 research outputs found
Spontaneous cell-mediated cytotoxicity in humans. Distribution and characterization of the effector cell.
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Renal transplantation at the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center: an update of results in the cyclosporine era
This chapter presents a summary of living-related, living-unrelated, and cadaver renal transplantation performed at the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center between January 1984 and October 1992. Over the past 9 years, 895 patients (557 males, 338 females, mean age 42 yrs) received 942 renal transplants; 599 patients received kidneys from cadaver donors (n = 627) and 296 patients received kidneys (n = 315) from living donors of all types. During this period, 151 patients were retransplanted, sometimes more than once (159 total retransplants, 124 secondary grafts, and 35 third or more transplants). An analysis of patient ant graft survival rates (calculated by actuarial methods) for different categories of transplant recipients was performed. Black recipients, as a racial subcategory, had the poorest graft outcome, especially when followed over the long term. Graft survival rates for Black recipients who were retransplanted with cadaver grafts were even worse and were noted to be similar to the diabetic population that received cadaver retransplants (66% vs 62% at 1 yr and 32% vs 25% at 5 yrs). Diabetic recipients of living-donor transplants had excellent graft survival results, similar to nondiabetic, living-donor recipients (patient survival rates 98% and 92% vs 97% and 92% at 1 and 5 yrs; graft survival rates 92% and 82% vs 92% and 82% at 1 and 5 yrs). HLA-identical recipients of first cadaver grafts demonstrated the best outcome in the entire cadaver series (graft survival rates 91% and 83% at 1 and 5 yrs, respectively). HLA-identical recipients of second or more cadaver grafts had poorer results than expected (50% graft survival at 1 yr) despite a 100% patient survival rate. HLA-identical recipients of living-related grafts had the best graft survival rates (96% at 1 yr and 94% at 5 yrs) and superior graft survival rates for retransplanted grafts as well (100% at 1 and 5 yrs). We conclude that in the last decade, patient and graft survival rates for cadaveric and living-donor renal transplants have improved dramatically relative to the results obtained in the pre-CsA era. Long-term graft survival in Black recipients remains lower than in other races, suggesting the need to analyze other factors to explain poorer graft survival in this recipient population. Results in diabetic recipients continue to be excellent at our center, encouraging the continuation of our aggressive approach to try to transplant diabetics as early as possible, particularly when a living donor is available
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
