276,546 research outputs found

    Friedrich Wilhelm Zachariae in Braunschweig / von Paul Zimmermann

    No full text
    FRIEDRICH WILHELM ZACHARIAE IN BRAUNSCHWEIG / VON PAUL ZIMMERMANN Friedrich Wilhelm Zachariae in Braunschweig / von Paul Zimmermann (1) Cover (3) Titelseite (7) Widmung (9) Vorbericht (11) I. Zachariaes Berufung nach Braunschweig (13) II. Zachariae und Bertling (16) III. Zachariae und Gleim (30) IV. Zachariae und Gottsched (68) V. Zachariaes Lehrtätigkeit am Collegium Carolinum (89) VI. Zachariae als Redacteur und Buchhändler (94) VII. Tod und Hinterbliebene Zachariaes (181) VIII. Übersicht der Schriften Zachariaes (187) IX. Bilder von Zachariae (208) Personenverzeichnis (212) Inhalt (218

    Chantbook for Lipparella : by Walter Zimmermann

    No full text
    Lipparella omfattande samarbete med tonsättaren Walter Zimmermann har lett till porträttkonserter på Goethe Institutet och Fylkingen i Stockholm samt en CD inspelning på det tyska skivboladet World Edition. Zimmermann, som länge hört till de mest egensinniga komponisterna i Tyskland, har komponerat två nya verk för Lipparella med texter av Inger Christensen och Gunnar Ekelöf. Båda diktarnas inspelade röster ingår också i verken. Ensemblen har även studerat in redan befintlig musik av Zimmermann, delvis i nya versioner för ensemblens besättning. Här finns bland annat soloverk för alla i ensemblen, och fyra sånger med vardera ett instrument.  CD-inspelning</p

    Bubanović i Zimmermann o duši i tijelu

    No full text
    Since 1915 till the end of 1917 a public disscussion between Fran Bubanović and Stjepan Zimmermann took place regarding the relation between body and soul. Bubanović advocated materialism, while Zimmermann claimed that the soul is distinct from the body, and that it is not extended. The debate also touched on the relationship of philosophy and the natural sciences; Bubanović thought that philosophy has to take into consideration the results of natural science and Zimmermann criticized the legitimacy of inferring significant philosophical theses from scientific results due to his belief that human knowledge transcends experience.Od 1915. do kraja 1917. vodila se polemika između Frana Bubanovića i Stjepana Zimmermanna oko odnosa tijela i duše. Bubanović je zastupao materijalizam, dok je Zimmermann tvrdio da su tijelo i duša različiti, te da je duša neprotežna. Debata se doticala i odnosa filozofije prema prirodnim znanostima, gdje je Bubanović tvrdio da filozofija mora uzeti u obzir rezultate prirodnih znanosti, a Zimmermann je smatrao da je filozofija jednim svojim dijelom neovisna o prirodnim znanostima

    Mercier i Zimmermann o odnosu između filozofije i teologije

    No full text
    In this paper, a comparison is made between Mercier’s and Zimmermann’s views on the relationship between theology and philosophy, in order to determine whether Mercier influenced Zimmermann in this regard. Several issues are relevant in this context: first, whether theology should be a positive or a negative norm of philosophy, second, what should be the domain of the normative impact of theology on philosophy, and third, whether that impact is, from a logical point of view, merely allowable or necessary. The research resulted in the following findings: first, both Mercier and Zimmermann hold the opinion that theology should be a negative norm of philosophy, second, contrary to Mercier, Zimmermann holds that theology should not only be a negative but also a positive norm of philosophy, third, while Mercier believes that the normative impact of theology on philosophy should be strictly restricted only to the results of philosophical research, Zimmermann sees no problem in extending the impact to cover not only the results but also the very process of philosophical research, and fourth, both Mercier and Zimmermann consider the impact to be logically necessary, rather than merely allowable, but the necessity is founded, according to Mercier, on revealed truths being mediately evident and absolutely certain, whereas Zimmermann considers it founded on revealed truths being guaranteed and morally certain. The conclusion reads that Mercier left no significant mark on Zimmermann’s views on the relationship between theology and philosophy.U ovom je radu Mercierovo shvaćanje odnosa između teologije i filozofije uspoređeno s Zimmermannovim. Svrha je te usporedbe utvrditi je li Mercier utjecao na Zimmermannove nazore o tom odnosu. Nekoliko je pitanja pritom relevantno: prvo, treba li teologija biti pozitivna ili negativna norma filozofije, drugo, što bi trebalo biti područje normativnog utjecaja teologije na filozofiju i, treće, je li taj utjecaj s logičkog gledišta samo dopustiv ili je i nužan. Istraživanje je rezultiralo sljedećim uvidima: prvo, i Mercier i Zimmermann drže da bi teologija trebala biti negativna norma filozofije, drugo, nasuprot Mercieru, Zimmermann drži da bi teologija trebala biti ne samo negativna nego i pozitivna norma filozofije, treće, dok Mercier vjeruje da utjecaj teologije na filozofiju treba biti striktno ograničen samo na rezultate filozofskih istraživanja, Zimmermann ne vidi problem u proširenju tog utjecaja i na sam proces filozofijskog istraživanja, a ne samo na njegove rezultate, i, četvrto, i Mercier i Zimmermann drže utjecaj teologije na filozofiju logički nužnim, a ne samo dopustivim, ali se prema Mercieru ta nužnost temelji na posrednoj očitosti i apsolutnoj sigurnosti objavljenih istina, dok je Zimmermann drži utemeljenom na zajamčenoj istinitosti i moralnoj sigurnosti objavljenih istina. Autori zaključuju da Mercier nije znatnije utjecao na Zimmermannove nazore o odnosu između teologije i filozofije

    Stjepan Zimmermann, Znanje i vjera. Studije i rasprave

    No full text
    Prikaz knjige Stjepana Zimmermann, Znanje i vjera. Studije i rasprav

    Hedychrum mucronatum ZIMMERMANN 1956

    No full text
    Hedychrum mucronatum ZIMMERMANN 1956 Hedychrum mucronatum n.sp.: ZIMMERMANN 1956: 145 (descr. (), Madagascar), 146 (fig. 2), 147 (fig. 3), 160 (cat.). Hedychrum mucronatum ZIMMERMANN 1956: ZIMMERMANN 1961: 304 (Madagascar), 319 (cat.). Hedychrum mucronatum ZIMMERMANN 1956: KIMSEY & BOHART 1990: 216 (cat.). Hedychrum mucronatum ZIMMERMANN 1956: MADL 2008: 90 (cat., Madagascar). D i s t r i b u t i o n: Madagascar: Prov. Mahajanga: Andriba – Prov. Toamasina: Andekaleka (Rogez), Ivondro. Endemic.Published as part of C. O, Madl, M. & Olmi, M., 2010, A Catalogue of the Bethylidae, Chrysididae, Dryinidae, Embolemidae, Sclerogibbidae and Scolebythidae (Hymenoptera: Chrysidoidea) of the Malagasy Subregion, pp. 845-918 in Linzer biologische Beiträge 42 (2) on page 869, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.533509

    Chrysidea phoebe ZIMMERMANN 1956

    No full text
    Chrysidea phoebe ZIMMERMANN 1956 Chrysidea phoebe n.sp.: ZIMMERMANN 1956: 151 (descr., Madagascar), 160 (cat.). Chrysidea phoebe ZIMMERMANN 1956: ZIMMERMANN 1961: 320 (cat., Madagascar). Chrysidea phoebe ZIMMERMANN 1956: BOHART 1988: 130 (key). Chrysidea phoebe ZIMMERMANN 1956: KIMSEY & BOHART 1990: 314 (cat.). Chrysidea phoebe ZIMMERMANN 1956: MADL 1990: 83 (Madagascar.). Chrysidea phoebe ZIMMERMANN 1956: MADL 2008: 90 (cat., Madagascar). D i s t r i b u t i o n: Madagascar: Prov. Toliara: Behara, Bekily. Endemic.Published as part of C. O, Madl, M. & Olmi, M., 2010, A Catalogue of the Bethylidae, Chrysididae, Dryinidae, Embolemidae, Sclerogibbidae and Scolebythidae (Hymenoptera: Chrysidoidea) of the Malagasy Subregion, pp. 845-918 in Linzer biologische Beiträge 42 (2) on page 860, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.533509

    Holopyga scutellaris ZIMMERMANN 1956

    No full text
    Holopyga scutellaris ZIMMERMANN 1956 Holopyga scutellare n.sp.: ZIMMERMANN 1956: 142 (descr., fig. 1, Madagascar), 159 (cat.). Holopyga scutellare ZIMMERMANN 1956: ZIMMERMANN 1961: 301 (biol., Madagascar), 319 (cat.). Holopyga scutellare ZIMMERMANN 1956: KIMSEY 1986: 109 (tax., Madagascar). Holopyga scutellaris ZIMMERMANN 1956: KIMSEY & BOHART 1990: 235 (cat.). Holopyga scutellaris ZIMMERMANN 1956: MADL 2008: 90 (cat., Madagascar). Hosts: (?) Agenia sp. (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) – Tachysphex sp. (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae). D i s t r i b u t i o n: Madagascar: Prov. Mahajanga: Ambato-Boeni – Prov. Antananarivo: Antananarivo, Antsirabe – Prov. Fianarantsoa: Ranohira – Prov. Toliara: Behara, Bekily, Esira, Sakaraha. Endemic.Published as part of C. O, Madl, M. & Olmi, M., 2010, A Catalogue of the Bethylidae, Chrysididae, Dryinidae, Embolemidae, Sclerogibbidae and Scolebythidae (Hymenoptera: Chrysidoidea) of the Malagasy Subregion, pp. 845-918 in Linzer biologische Beiträge 42 (2) on pages 869-870, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.533509
    corecore