1,726,708 research outputs found
Engaging Material Education in Design
No full textOVERVIEW: For years now, design students have started to hold a conscious dialogue with materials, especially considering materials and their experiential attributes as designable elements. However, the design education focused on materials still struggles to keep pace with the practical needs of future designers and contradicts the technological and material world where we live. This study aims to comprehend the dynamic role materials play in design education and propose a feasible pedagogical framework based on the concept of materials experience. Through two consistent studies where the materials courses and their results in design schools are analysed, the research has worked out the corresponding material innovation patterns and highlighted the relevant design capacity. Then, the hypothesis of the pedagogical framework is proposed, with its feasibility verified in a real classroom to conclude the research
Designing Materials and Material Designers: Research by DIY-Materials Research Group
No full text内容摘要 :材料的世界是在不断地改变和演化的。随着科技的进步、社会的发展,设计师看待材料
的视角变得越来越多元。从提出材料的可替代解决方案,到发掘传统材料的文化与情感意义,从结
合科技手段为材料增加新的属性,到运用生物技术让材料自我生长,设计师关于材料的创新与实践
层出不穷,这为未来设计的发展提供了新思路。本文将会介绍米兰理工大学 DIY 材料研究组(DIYMaterials research group)当前的设计与研究成果。
关键词 :材料体验、材料思辨、DIY 材料、材料教育、可持续设
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Preface
No full text
- …
