1,720,964 research outputs found
Підвищення продуктивності коду мовою РYТНОN з використанням техніки переписувальних правил
Full text linkPython is a popular programming language used in many areas, but its performance is significantly lower than many compiled languages. We propose an approach to increasing performance of Python code by transforming fragments of code to more efficient languages such as Cython and C++. We use high-level algebraic models and rewriting rules technique for semi-automated code transformation. Performance-critical fragments of code are transformed into a low-level syntax model using Python parser. Then this low-level model is further transformed into a high-level algebraic model that is language-independent and easier to work with. The transformation is automated using rewriting rules implemented in Termware system. We also improve the constructed high-level model by deducing additional information such as data types and constraints. From this enhanced high-level model of code we generate equivalent fragments of code using code generators for Cython and C++ languages. Cython code is seamlessly integrated with Python code, and for C++ code we generate a small utility file in Cython that also integrates this code with Python. This way, the bulk of program code can stay in Python and benefit from its facilities, but performance-critical fragments of code are transformed into more efficient equivalents, improving the performance of resulting program. Comparison of execution times between initial version of Python code, different versions of transformed code and using automatic tools such as Cython compiler and PyPy demonstrates the benefits of our approach – we have achieved performance gains of over 50x compared to the initial version written in Python, and over 2x compared to the best automatic tool we have tested.Problems in programming 2020; 2-3: 115-125 Предложен подход повышения производительности кода, написанного на языке Python, с помощью преобразования фрагментов кода в более эффективные языки Cython и C ++. Использованы высокоуровневые алгебраические модели и техника переписывающих правил для автоматизации преобразований кода. Проведено сравнение времени выполнения простых программ – начальной версии на языке Python, различных версий преобразованного кода, а также автоматических средств Cython и PyPy, что демонстрирует эффективность предложенного подхода.Problems in programming 2020; 2-3: 115-125Запропоновано підхід підвищення продуктивності коду, написаного мовою Python, шляхом перетворення фрагментів коду до більш ефективних мов Cython та C++. Використано високорівневі алгебраїчні моделі та техніку переписувальних правил для автоматизації перетворень програмного коду. Проведено порівняння часу виконання простих програм – початкової версії мовою Python, різних версій перетвореного коду, а також автоматичних засобів Cython та PyPy, що демонструє ефективність запропонованого підходу.Problems in programming 2020; 2-3: 115-12
Improving performance of Python code using rewriting rules technique
No full textPython is a popular programming language used in many areas, but its performance is significantly lower than many compiled languages. We propose an approach to increasing performance of Python code by transforming fragments of code to more efficient languages such as Cython and C++. We use high-level algebraic models and rewriting rules technique for semi-automated code transformation. Performance-critical fragments of code are transformed into a low-level syntax model using Python parser. Then this low-level model is further transformed into a high-level algebraic model that is language-independent and easier to work with. The transformation is automated using rewriting rules implemented in Termware system. We also improve the constructed high-level model by deducing additional information such as data types and constraints. From this enhanced high-level model of code we generate equivalent fragments of code using code generators for Cython and C++ languages. Cython code is seamlessly integrated with Python code, and for C++ code we generate a small utility file in Cython that also integrates this code with Python. This way, the bulk of program code can stay in Python and benefit from its facilities, but performance-critical fragments of code are transformed into more efficient equivalents, improving the performance of resulting program. Comparison of execution times between initial version of Python code, different versions of transformed code and using automatic tools such as Cython compiler and PyPy demonstrates the benefits of our approach – we have achieved performance gains of over 50x compared to the initial version written in Python, and over 2x compared to the best automatic tool we have tested.Problems in programming 2020; 2-3: 115-125
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
