1,720,970 research outputs found
FIGURE 1 in Camellia suddeeana (Theaceae), a new species from Thailand
FIGURE 1. The holotype of Camellia suddeeana, S. Suddee et al. 4981 (BKF SN235114!). Image scanned by BKF.Published as part of Zhao, Dongwei, 2023, Camellia suddeeana (Theaceae), a new species from Thailand, pp. 232-236 in Phytotaxa 594 (3) on page 233, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.594.3.7, http://zenodo.org/record/791697
Camellia (sect. Paracamellia) Sealy 1958
Camellia sect. Paracamellia Sealy (1958: 192). Type:— Camellia kissi Wallich (1820: 429). = Camellia sect. Pierrea Orel in Orel et al. (2014: 310), syn. nov. Type:— Camellia ligustrina Orel, Curry & Luu in Orel et al. (2014: 310). = Camellia sect. Lamdongia Orel in Orel & Curry (2015: 180), syn. nov. Type:— Camellia cuongiana Orel & Curry (2015: 180).Published as part of Zhao, Dongwei, 2022, Three new synonyms of Camellia kissi (Theaceae), pp. 83-84 in Phytotaxa 531 (1) on page 83, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.531.1.8, http://zenodo.org/record/584358
FIGURE 2. Camellia suddeeana. A in Camellia suddeeana (Theaceae), a new species from Thailand
FIGURE 2. Camellia suddeeana. A: branchlet; B–D: flowers; E: flower without petals and androecium; F: fragment of a dry flower, with some sepals removed to show gynoecium; G: dry carpels and seeds. A–E: the plant of S. Suddee et al. 4981 (type); F: Chermsirivathana 1185 (BKF, paratype); G: Niyomdham 4925 (BKF, paratype). The bars indicate 2 cm (in A and G) and 5 mm (in B–F). Photos A–E were taken by Wittawat Kiewbang (BKF) and F–G by Dongwei Zhao.Published as part of Zhao, Dongwei, 2023, Camellia suddeeana (Theaceae), a new species from Thailand, pp. 232-236 in Phytotaxa 594 (3) on page 235, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.594.3.7, http://zenodo.org/record/791697
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
sj-pdf-1-pic-10.1177_09544062211025073 - Supplemental material for Numerical investigations of the clinching process and the failure prediction of clinched joints for dissimilar sheets
Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-pic-10.1177_09544062211025073 for Numerical investigations of the clinching process and the failure prediction of clinched joints for dissimilar sheets by Qihan Li, Chuanwei Xu, Song Gao, Fenglei Ma, Qingming Zhao, Dongwei Gu and Xiaoheng Han in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science</p
Camellia kissi Wallich 1820
<p> <i>Camellia kissi</i> Wallich (1820: 429)</p> <p> <b>Type</b>:— NEPAL. 1818, <i>Gardner s.n.</i> (BM000948697!).</p> <p> = <i>Camellia thailandica</i> Chang & Ren (1991: 67), <i>syn. nov.</i> Type:— THAILAND. Khao Yai National Park, Khao Khieo, 14°21’N, 101°22’E, elev. 1200–1300 m, 29 October 1970, <i>Charoenphol et al. 4205</i> (holotype MO; isotypes BKF!, C!, K!).</p> <p> = <i>Camellia ligustrina</i> Orel, Curry & Luu in Orel <i>et al</i>. (2014: 310), <i>syn. nov.</i> Type:— VIETNAM. Lam Dong: Mount Lang Biang, elev. 1850 m, 16 December 2011, <i>Orel & Curry 0734</i> (holotype NSW900397 [image!]).</p> <p> = <i>Camellia cuongiana</i> Orel & Curry (2015: 180), <i>syn. nov.</i> Type:— VIETNAM. Lam Dong: Bidoup-Nui Ba National Park, 5 November 2012, <i>Orel et al. 0721</i> (holotype NSW901040 [image!]).</p> <p> <b>Nomenclatural notes</b>:— Chang & Bartholomew (1984) and Ming & Bartholomew (2007) thought that the epithet of <i>C. kissi</i> should be “ <i>kissii</i> ” without any further comment. However, in the protologue of the species, Wallich (1820: 429) stated that “...I propose calling <i>Camellia kissi</i>, the <i>Newar</i> name being <i>Kissi</i> or <i>Kissi-soak</i> by enumerating the points on which their specific difference appears to me to rest”. It seems that the epithet is derived from the vernacular name and therefore, the original spelling of the epithet, <i>kissi</i>, should be retained (see Art. 60 Ex. 21 of the ICN).</p> <p> <b>Morphological notes</b>:— <i>Camellia thailandica</i> was simply compared with <i>C. brevistyla</i> (Hayata 1908: 63) Cohen-Stuart (1916: 67) on the size and shape of the leaves and flowers in the protologue (Chang & Ren 1991), and it is actually <i>C. kissi</i> based on its protologue and the types examined.</p> <p> <i>Camellia ligustrina</i> was not compared with a specific taxon of <i>Camellia</i> in the protologue (Orel <i>et al</i>. 2014). It was described as bearing a “finely hairy” seed, but the seeds of the holotype are glabrous (NSW900397 [image]). Based on the type and the photos reported (Orel & Curry 2015), <i>C. ligustrina</i> is treated as a heterotypic synonym of <i>C. kissi</i>. Orel <i>et al</i>. (2014: 310), however, established <i>Camellia</i> sect. <i>Pierrea</i> based on <i>C. ligustrina</i>, accordingly, this section is recognized as a heterotypic synonym of <i>Camellia</i> sect. <i>Paracamellia</i>.</p> <p> Similarly, Orel & Curry (2015: 182) did not compare <i>C. cuongiana</i> with other taxa of <i>Camellia</i> probably because they thought that it “possesses a combination of morphological characters which do not occur in any other known <i>Camellia</i> L. species”, and thus they established <i>Camellia</i> sect. <i>Lamdongia</i> based on it. However, the type and the photos in the protologue could clearly suggest that it is merely another representative of <i>C. kissi</i>. Therefore, sect. <i>Lamdongia</i> is treated as another heterotypic synonym of sect. <i>Paracamellia</i> in <i>Camellia</i>.</p>Published as part of <i>Zhao, Dongwei, 2022, Three new synonyms of Camellia kissi (Theaceae), pp. 83-84 in Phytotaxa 531 (1)</i> on pages 83-84, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.531.1.8, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5843583">http://zenodo.org/record/5843583</a>
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Camellia suddeeana D. Wei Zhao 2023, sp. nov.
<p> <i>Camellia suddeeana</i> D.Wei Zhao <i>sp. nov.</i> (Figs. 1–2)</p> <p> Type:— THAILAND. Nakhon Phanom Province, Ban Phaeng District, Phu Lang Ka Natianal Park,trail to hill top, 17°58’58’’N, 104°7’38’’E, 373 m, 23 October 2015, <i>S. Suddee et al. 4981</i> (holotype: BKF SN235114!, isotypes: BKF SN235115!, BKF SN235116!, TCD!).</p> Diagnosis: <p> Similar to <i>C. szemaoensis</i> Chang (1981: 94) and <i>C. hainingii</i> S.X. Yang & Y.S. Huang in Ye <i>et al</i>. (2022: 291), but differs from the former in having glabrous (vs. hairy) abaxial surface of the sepals, ovary and seeds, and from the latter by leaves without (vs. with) cork-warts and the longer styles (3–9 mm vs. 1.5–2.0 mm) (Table 1).</p> <p>Shrubs or trees up to 10 m tall. Bark greyish brown. New branchlets pubescent to villous, terminal buds puberulous. Petioles 2–10 mm long, pubescent or puberulous; leaf blades elliptic or oblong, 3.5–14 × 1.3–5.5 cm, coriaceous, abaxially dull green, sparsely appressed puberulous especially along midrib, or glabrous, adaxially dark green, glabrous or hirsute along midrib, midrib and secondary veins abaxially elevated and adaxially impressed, secondary veins 5–8 pairs, base attenuate, margin serrulate, apex acute, attenuate to caudate. Flowers axillary, solitary or paired, 1.5–3.5 cm in diam. Pedicel ca. 2 mm long. Bracteoles 3–6, deltate to semi-orbicular, 1–3 × 1.5–4 mm, outside glabrous or puberulous at apex, inside glabrous to slightly sericeous, margin ciliolate. Sepals 5–7, persistent, suborbicular, 2–5 × 4–5 mm, outside glabrous, inside sericeous. Petals 6–8 in 1–2 whorls, white, elliptic to obovate, 7–18 × 4–9 mm, outside glabrous, inside glabrous or sericeous at apex, apex obtuse to rounded, inner 4–5 petals basally adnate to filament whorl for ca. 2 mm. Stamens numerous, 6–10 mm long; filaments white, glabrous, outer filaments basally connate for 2–3 mm. Ovary globose to ovoid, glabrous. Styles 3(–4), distinct, 3–9 mm long, glabrous. Capsule globose or bi-coccal, 2.5–4.5 cm in diam., 1–2-loculed with 1–2 seeds; pericarp 0.5–2 mm thick, smooth or furfuraceous. Seeds light brown to fuscous, globose, 1.5–2.5 cm in diam., glabrous. Flowering October–November, fruiting April–July.</p> <p> <b>Other specimens examined (paratypes).</b> THAILAND. Loei Province: Phu Luang, ca. 1200 m, 23 November 1957, <i>Dee 1025</i> (BKF SN060875); Ban Na Luang, 300 m, 20 November 1968, <i>Chermsirivathana 1185</i> (BK203761, BKF SN060858; Fig. 3F). Mae Hong Son Province: Khun Youm District, 8 April 1977, <i>Nimanong & Phusomsaeng 1816</i> (BKF). Nong Khai Province: Phu Wua, 20 April 1996, <i>Niyomdham 4925</i> (BKF SN 209980, BKF SN102858; Fig. 3G); Bueng Khla, Phu Wua Wildlife Sanctuary, trail from Pha Nang Khoi to Tham Noi, 18°14’14’’N, 103°57’38’’E, 350 m, 30 July 2008, <i>Pooma et al. 7333</i> (BKF SN191784). Phetchabun Province: Wang Thong, Thung Salaeng Luang National Park, 700 m, <i>Koyama et al. T-31930</i> (BKF SN060873). Pitsanulok Province: Nahaew to Romklao Rd, 700 m, <i>Pooma 1237</i> (BKF SN090320). Uttaradit Province: Nampad, Thud Phra Kiet National Park, ca. 650 m, 9 December 1994, <i>Santisuk et al. s.n.</i> (BKF SN109856).</p> <p> <b>Distribution and habitat.</b> <i>Camellia suddeeana</i> is endemic to the northern Thailand and occurs in the evergreen or deciduous forests at elevations of 250–1200 m.</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> <i>Camellia suddeeana</i> is named after the leading collector of its type, Dr. Somran Suddee at BKF. Its Chinese name is proposed as “ <b>ðẍψ⁂</b> ” because it generally occurs in the northern Thailand.</p>Published as part of <i>Zhao, Dongwei, 2023, Camellia suddeeana (Theaceae), a new species from Thailand, pp. 232-236 in Phytotaxa 594 (3)</i> on pages 232-234, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.594.3.7, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/7916975">http://zenodo.org/record/7916975</a>
- …
