1,720,997 research outputs found
Three new species of Micropsalliota (Agaricaceae, Agaricales) from China
No full textLi, Jia-Xin, He, Mao-Qiang, Zhao, Rui-Lin (2021): Three new species of Micropsalliota (Agaricaceae, Agaricales) from China. Phytotaxa 491 (2): 167-176, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.491.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.491.2.
FIGURE 4 in Three new species of Micropsalliota (Agaricaceae, Agaricales) from China
No full textFIGURE 4. Micropsalliota dentatomarginata (HMAS290760, holotype). (A–B). basidiomata in field (C). cheilocystidia; (D) basidia (E) basidiospores; (F) annulus hyphae; (G) pileipellis hyphae; Bars: A, B = 1 cm; C–G = 20 μm.Published as part of Li, Jia-Xin, He, Mao-Qiang & Zhao, Rui-Lin, 2021, Three new species of Micropsalliota (Agaricaceae, Agaricales) from China, pp. 167-176 in Phytotaxa 491 (2) on page 174, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.491.2.6, http://zenodo.org/record/575473
Englerulaceae (Dothideomycetes)
No full textDai, Dong-Qin, Boonmee, Saranyaphat, Tian, Qing, Xiao, Yuan-Pin, Bhat, D. Jayarama, Chukeatirote, Ekachai, Alias, S. Aisyah, Zhao, Rui-Lin, Wang, Yong, Hyde, Kevin D. (2014): Englerulaceae (Dothideomycetes). Phytotaxa 176 (1): 139-155, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.176.1.14, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.176.1.1
FIGURE 3 in Englerulaceae (Dothideomycetes)
No full textFIGURE 3. Parenglerula macowaniana (syntype). A. Black ascomata on host surface. B. Squash of ascoma. C. Brown to light brown pseudoparaphyses. D–G. Asci containing ascospores. H, I. Immature ascospores. J, K. Dark brown mature ascospores. Scale bars: A, B = 100 µm, C–G = 50 µm, H–K = 20 µm.Published as part of Dai, Dong-Qin, Boonmee, Saranyaphat, Tian, Qing, Xiao, Yuan-Pin, Bhat, D. Jayarama, Chukeatirote, Ekachai, Alias, S. Aisyah, Zhao, Rui-Lin, Wang, Yong & Hyde, Kevin D., 2014, Englerulaceae (Dothideomycetes), pp. 139-155 in Phytotaxa 176 (1) on page 145, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.176.1.14, http://zenodo.org/record/514414
FIGURE 2. Goosia melastomatis. A. Hyphae with immature ascomata and hyphopodia. B. Phialides and hyphopodia. C. Asci containing ascospores. D. Ascospores with one septum. E in Englerulaceae (Dothideomycetes)
No full textFIGURE 2. Goosia melastomatis. A. Hyphae with immature ascomata and hyphopodia. B. Phialides and hyphopodia. C. Asci containing ascospores. D. Ascospores with one septum. E. Globose conidia. Scale bars: A, B = 30 µm, C = 15 µm, D, E = 10 µm. Redrawn from Bin (2003).Published as part of Dai, Dong-Qin, Boonmee, Saranyaphat, Tian, Qing, Xiao, Yuan-Pin, Bhat, D. Jayarama, Chukeatirote, Ekachai, Alias, S. Aisyah, Zhao, Rui-Lin, Wang, Yong & Hyde, Kevin D., 2014, Englerulaceae (Dothideomycetes), pp. 139-155 in Phytotaxa 176 (1) on page 143, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.176.1.14, http://zenodo.org/record/514414
FIGURE 1 in Englerulaceae (Dothideomycetes)
No full textFIGURE 1. Englerula macarangae (syntype). A. Appearance of colonies on lower leaf surface (left), and close up of ascomata on mycelium (right). B. Squash mount of ascoma. C–G. Asci with ascospores. F. Dehisced ascus. H. Immature ascospores. I–J. Brown mature ascospores surrounded by mucilaginous material. Scale bars: A = 100 µm, B–G = 50 µm, H–J = 20 µm.Published as part of Dai, Dong-Qin, Boonmee, Saranyaphat, Tian, Qing, Xiao, Yuan-Pin, Bhat, D. Jayarama, Chukeatirote, Ekachai, Alias, S. Aisyah, Zhao, Rui-Lin, Wang, Yong & Hyde, Kevin D., 2014, Englerulaceae (Dothideomycetes), pp. 139-155 in Phytotaxa 176 (1) on page 142, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.176.1.14, http://zenodo.org/record/514414
FIGURE 6 in Englerulaceae (Dothideomycetes)
No full textFIGURE 6. Thrauste medinillae (holotype) A, B. Herbarium material. C, D. Ascomata on hyphae which form on the lower surface of leaves (arrow). E. Dark brown hyphae with hyphopodia. F. Squash mount of brown ascoma. G. Squash mount of cells of peridium. H. Immature ascomata and hyphopodia. I–K. Asci containing ascospores. L–O. Hyaline ascospores with single septum. Scale bars: C = 1000 µm, D = 100 µm, E = 50 µm, F = 20 µm, G = 10 µm, H = 10 µm, I–O = 5 µm.Published as part of Dai, Dong-Qin, Boonmee, Saranyaphat, Tian, Qing, Xiao, Yuan-Pin, Bhat, D. Jayarama, Chukeatirote, Ekachai, Alias, S. Aisyah, Zhao, Rui-Lin, Wang, Yong & Hyde, Kevin D., 2014, Englerulaceae (Dothideomycetes), pp. 139-155 in Phytotaxa 176 (1) on page 150, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.176.1.14, http://zenodo.org/record/514414
FIGURE 3 in Towards a natural classification of Dothideomycetes 3: The genera Muellerites, Trematosphaeriopsis, Vizellopsis and Yoshinagella (Dothideomycetes incertae sedis)
No full textFIGURE 3. Trematosphaeriopsis parmeliana (isotype). a. Herbarium material. b, c. Reddish yellow ascostromata on the host. d, e. Section of ascostroma. f. Wall of ascostroma. g. Ascostroma with locules. h. Pseudoparaphyses. i–k. Asci with ascospores. l–o. Ascospores. Scale bars: b, c =1 mm, d–g = 100 µm, h–o = 10 µm.Published as part of Dai, Dong-Qin, Bahkali, Ali H., Bhat, D. Jayarama, Xiao, Yuan-Ping, Chukeatirote, Ekachai, Zhao, Rui-Lin, Xu, Jian-Chu & Hyde, Kevin D., 2014, Towards a natural classification of Dothideomycetes 3: The genera Muellerites, Trematosphaeriopsis, Vizellopsis and Yoshinagella (Dothideomycetes incertae sedis), pp. 18-27 in Phytotaxa 176 (1) on page 23, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.176.1.5, http://zenodo.org/record/514401
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
