1,720,964 research outputs found

    La mente può essere naturalizzata?

    No full text
    Nel maggio del 2011 studiosi italiani e stranieri appartenenti a varie aree disciplinari – filosofi, scienziati cognitivi, fisici, informatici e neuroscienziati – si sono ritrovati a Siena per discutere sulla naturalizzabilità della mente. Questo volume è il frutto di quelle discussioni. Al centro dei saggi qui raccolti si trova, semplificando molto, il quesito metafisico sollevato dall’odierno contrasto tra neuroscienze e senso comune: che cosa ci rende capaci di sentire, immaginare, pensare, volere, ricordare, amare e odiare? È la presenza in noi di un’anima, di una mente, di uno spirito? Oppure è la struttura del nostro cervello (e dell’insieme delle funzioni che esso è capace di svolgere) a fare di noi gli esseri intelligenti che siamo (o per lo meno che crediamo di essere)? Quesiti di tal genere sono qui affrontati da varie angolature. Una distinzione piuttosto netta può essere rilevata tra la prima parte del volume, dove sono raggruppati i saggi più orientati verso il naturalismo scientifico e riduzionistico, e la seconda parte, nella quale sono collocati quelli più inclini al naturalismo ‘liberalizzato’ e alla critica del materialismo

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Body sway modulation by hypnotisability and gender during low and high demanding postural conditions.

    No full text
    The cognitive trait of hypnotisability, associated with the proneness to accept suggestions, exhibits several physiological correlates including the modulation of sensorimotor integration and, in particular, of postural control. In this respect, we have shown that, at eyes closure, healthy subjects with high hypnotisability scores (highs) having their feet 2 cm apart show larger and faster body sway with respect to low hypnotizable individuals (lows). The aim of the present study was to investigate whether hypnotisability modulates body sway during slightly more demanding and very difficult postural conditions such as feet together bipedal posture and one legged stance, respectively. Stabilometric variables were studied: the body Centre of Pressure (CoP) Area and mean Velocity, the CoP mean position (Xmean, Ymean) and its variability (SDx, SDy) in the frontal and sagittal planes were acquired in 18 highs (9 females) and 18 lows (9 females). Results showed that the previously observed lows’ smaller and slower body sway was not present any longer. Nonetheless, hypnotisability interacted with gender in the modulation of the variability of the CoP movement in the frontal plane during both the bipedal, feet together posture and one legged stance, as significant gender differences were observed only among lows. In conclusion, results confirm a role of hypnotisability in sensorimotor integration and support the relevance of hypnotic assessment in clinical settings, as hypnotisability may be responsible for part of the postural variability

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore