1,720,990 research outputs found
Sonographic imaging of abdominal and extraabdominal desmoids.
No full textPURPOSE: To describe the sonographic imaging characteristics of abdominal and extraabdominal desmoids.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 12 histologically and pathologically proven abdominal and extraabdominal desmoids. Two radiologists with musculoskeletal sonography experience reviewed sonographic images for lesion location, size, echotexture, and vascularity with agreement by consensus.
RESULTS: Desmoids were seen in 9 females and 3 males. They manifested as slowly growing masses. Nine lesions were intramuscular and 3 were found within the subcutaneous adipose tissue. A typical sonographic feature of all intramuscular desmoids was the spindle-shaped margin at the tumor ends when scanned along the long axis of the affected muscle. The desmoids arising from the fascia had an irregular shape. Tumor vascularity was rich in 6 cases and poor in 6 cases. A fibrillar pattern within the tumor was found in 75% of the cases.
CONCLUSION: A spindle-shaped appearance is common in intramuscular desmoids. Hyperechoic areas and a fibrillar pattern within desmoids are also common sonographic features
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
