222 research outputs found
Food and eating in fiction since 1950 with particular reference to the writing of Angela Carter, Doris Lessing, Michele Roberts and Alice Thomas Ellis.
No full textPhDEating is a fundamental activity. What people eat, how and with whom, what
they feel about food, what they do or do not want to eat and why - even who
they eat - are of crucial significance in any reading of human behaviour.
In this thesis, I consider the diverse and complex uses of food and eating
in fiction since 1950, especially that written by women. I argue both that food
and eating carry much of the meaning of a novel or story and that the acts of
cooking, feeding and eating depicted are inseparable from issues of power and
control: individually, interpersonally, culturally, politically.
My discussion centres on the writing of Angela Carter, Doris Lessing,
Michele Roberts and Alice Thomas Ellis. Drawing on psychoanalytic theory,
sociology, anthropology, Foucault, Bakhtin and others, the thesis aims to
construct an interdisciplinary perspective which both resists reductive
interpretations and emphasises the centrality, complexity and diversity of food
and eating in literature in our culture.
I begin with an examination of the ambiguities of maternal feeding and
nurturing, moving on to explore the links between appetite, eating and sexuality.
I explore cannibalism and vampirism as manifestations of oppression, but also as
indicating insatiable emptiness and transgressive appetite. The body itself is
crucial, and my argument considers the paradox of not eating as
control/enslavement, also tracing self-starvation as a positive route towards
wholeness and connection. The last part of my argument focuses on social
eating, examining conventions, rituals and food itself in connection with power
relations, and finally considers how we might truly speak of food and eating in
the context of society as a whole
THE PORTRAYAL OF MARY TURNER AS A RACIST IN DORIS LESSINGS THE GRASS IS SINGING
No full text Doris Lessing’s first novel ‘The Grass is Singing ‘is a clear depiction of hatred, frustration, revenge and humiliation. The author tries to bring about the setting in Africa under the White rule. It is an enthralling chronicle of human disintegration and a beautifully understated critique of the relationship between Black and Whites in the society. Doris Lessing’s brings out the caricature of the society through the characters of Mary Turner, who is a wife of white landlord and Moses who is a ‘houseboy’ of Black community. Through these characters the author depicts the racial discrimination prevailing in Southern Rhodesia under the colonial power of the British rule. The portrayal of Mary Turner as a psychological disintegrated wife of Dick Turner, an incompetent husband, and owner of an ill-fated land in South African is more convincing. This article probes into the character of Mary as strong racist and her attitude towards the blacks who she treats as mere slaves in the beginning of the novel but later falls prey to her own black servant Moses
Doris LINNAEUS 1758
No full textGENUS <i>DORIS</i> LINNAEUS, 1758 <p> <i>Doris</i> Linnaeus, 1758: 653. Type species: <i>Doris verrucosa</i> Linnaeus, 1758, by monotypy.</p> <p> <i>Doridigitata</i> d’Orbigny, 1836 -42 [1839]: 39–40, suppressed by Opinion 1980 (ICZN, 2001). Type species: <i>Doris verrucosa</i> Linnaeus, 1758, by subsequent designation by J. E. Gray (1847).</p> <p> <i>Doriopsis</i> Pease, 1860: 32–33. Type species: <i>Doriopsis granulosa</i> Pease, 1860, by monotypy, <b>syn. nov.</b></p> <p> <i>Staurodoris</i> Bergh, 1878a: 578–579, suppressed by Opinion 1980 (ICZN, 2001). Type species: <i>Doris verrucosa</i> Linnaeus, 1758, by original designation.</p> <p> <i>Archidoris</i> Bergh, 1878b: 616–617. Type species: <i>Doris pseudoargus</i> Rapp, 1827, by subsequent designation by Iredale & O’Donoghue (1923) <b>syn. nov.</b></p> <p> <i>Anoplodoris</i> Fischer, 1880 -87 [1883]: 521. Type species: <i>Doris pseudoargus</i> Rapp, 1827, by subsequent designation by Iredale & O’Donoghue (1923) <b>syn. nov.</b></p> <p> <i>Ctenodoris</i> Eliot, 1907: 338. Type species: <i>Staurodoris pecten</i> Eliot, 1906, by subsequent designation by Baba (1937), <b>syn. nov.</b></p> <p> <i>Austrodoris</i> Odhner, 1926: 67–68. Type species: <i>Archidoris rubescens</i> Bergh, 1898, by original designation, <b>syn. nov.</b></p> <p> <i>Guyonia</i> Risbec, 1928: 102. Type species: <i>Guyonia flava</i> Risbec, 1928, here designated <b>syn. nov.</b></p> <p> <i>Neodoris</i> Baba, 1938: 13–14. Type species: <i>Neodoris tricolor</i> Baba, 1938, by original designation, <b>syn. nov.</b></p> <p> <i>Siraius</i> Marcus, 1955: 134. Type species: <i>Siraius ilo</i> Er. Marcus, 1955, by original designation, <b>syn. nov.</b></p> <p> <i>Doriorbis</i> Kay & Young, 1969: 177–178. Type species: <i>Doris immonda</i> Risbec, 1928, here designated <b>syn. nov.</b></p> <p> <i>Diagnosis</i></p> <p>Dorsum covered with simple rounded tubercles, stiffened by integumentary spicules, which do not protrude from the dorsal surface. Head with two lateral prolongations. Anterior border of the foot grooved but not notched. Labial cuticle lacking rodlets. Radula composed of simple, hamate teeth. Outermost teeth may be simple or denticulate. Reproductive system with a tubular, granular and simple prostate. Penis and vagina devoid of hooks. Vestibular or accessory glands absent.</p> <p> <i>Remarks</i></p> <p> Linnaeus (1758) introduced the genus <i>Doris</i> for <i>Doris verrucosa</i>, with a short and confusing Latin description. It is not clear whether Linnaeus studied specimens himself or whether his description was based on the two pre-Linnaean and nonbinomial bibliographical references cited (Rumphius, 1705; Seba, 1735). These two papers describe different animals. ‘Limax marina verrucosa’, described by Rumphius (1705: 38), could be any shell-less gastropod, but probably a species of Phyllidiidae collected from Ambon, Indonesia. Seba’s (1735: pl. 61, fig. 5) ‘Mitella verrucosa’ is a nudibranch mollusc very likely identifiable as the Indo-Pacific species <i>Phyllidiella pustulosa</i> (Cuvier, 1804). However, <i>Doris verrucosa</i> has been identified by most authors as the European species described below, characterized by having hemispherical tubercles on the dorsum and numerous unipinnate branchial leaves. The name <i>Doris</i> has also been applied to the relatives of this species, first to all dorid nudibranchs having a circlet of dorsal respiratory leaves, and more recently to just a few species closely related to the mentioned European species. Bouchet & Valdés (2000) submitted a proposal to the ICZN in order to maintain the current usage of the generic and specific names <i>Doris verrucosa</i> by the designation of a neotype. This proposal was endorsed by the ruling of the Commission in Opinion 1980 (ICZN, 2001).</p> <p> D’Orbigny (1836–1842) [1839] segregated <i>Doris</i> into several discrete species groups, which he treated as subgenera. For the new species <i>Doris bertheloti</i>, from the Canary Islands, he established <i>Doridigitata</i>, where he also allocated <i>Doris verrucosa</i> (applying this name to the species mentioned above). Gray (1847) validly fixed <i>Doris verrucosa</i> as the type species of <i>Doridigitata</i>. The genus <i>Doridigitata</i> d’Orbigny, 1839 is an objective junior synonym of <i>Doris</i> because they are based on the same type species. Bergh (1878a) recognized that the original description of <i>Doris</i> did not fit with the usage of the name by most of the authors, and considered that <i>Doridigitata</i> was the valid name for this genus. At the same time, Bergh (1878a) introduced the new name <i>Staurodoris</i> to replace <i>Doridigitata</i>, which according to him was improperly formed. Therefore, <i>Staurodoris</i> and <i>Doridigitata</i> have the same type species and are objective synonyms.</p> <p> Bergh (1878b) introduced the genus <i>Archidoris</i> based on Cuvier’s (1804) misapplication of the name <i>Doris tuberculata</i> Müller, 1778 (see also remarks on <i>Doris pseudoargus</i>), <i>Doris flammea</i> Alder & Hancock, 1844 and <i>Doris montereyensis</i> Cooper, 1862. At the same time he mentioned: ‘The spawn and a fragment of the ontogeny of the type of this form [<i>Archidoris</i>] is known (see Alder & Hancock)’. Iredale & O’Donoghue (1923) interpreted this comment to mean that Bergh (1878b) had selected a misapplication of the name <i>Doris tuberculata</i> by Alder & Hancock to be the type species of <i>Archidoris</i>. Actually, Bergh’s (1878b) comment cannot be interpreted as the designation of a type species (see ICZN, 1999: Article 68.2). Therefore, Iredale & O’Donoghue (1923) were the first authors to designate a type species for the genus <i>Archidoris</i>, by subsequent designation. It is clear from the list of species and synonyms included in <i>Archidoris</i> that these authors meant to select the misapplication of the name <i>Doris tuberculata</i> by most authors (= <i>Doris pseudoargus</i> Rapp, 1827; see below) as the type species. Thus, according to Article 69.2.4 (ICZN, 1999), Iredale & O’Donoghue (1923) are deemed to have selected <i>Doris pseudoargus</i> Rapp, 1827 as the type species of <i>Archidoris</i>.</p> <p> Examination of the external morphology and anatomy of <i>Doris pseudoargus</i> shows that this species is very similar to <i>Doris verrucosa</i>, with the exception of the presence of large and rounded dorsal tubercles, unipinnate branchial leaves and pectinate outermost teeth in the latter. The phylogenetic analysis carried out (see below) showed that they are members of the same clade. There are no consistent differences that justify the maintenance of two different genera for these closely related taxa.</p> <p> Fischer (1880–1887) [1883] introduced the new genus <i>Anoplodoris</i> Fischer, 1883 to accommodate several nominal genera (and species) previously described. One of these species was cited as ‘ <i>Doris tuberculata</i> Linné’, which constitutes an incorrect citation rather than a misapplication. The name <i>Doris tuberculata</i> was never mentioned by Linnaeus in any of his works. Iredale & O’Donoghue (1923) subsequently designated ‘ <i>Doris tuberculata</i> Linné’ as the type species of <i>Anoplodoris</i>. Again, it is clear that these authors were referring to the misapplication of the name <i>Doris tuberculata</i> by most authors (= <i>Doris pseudoargus</i> Rapp, 1827; see below), and by the provisions of Article 69.2.4 (ICZN, 1999), Iredale & O’Donoghue (1923) are deemed to have selected <i>Doris pseudoargus</i> Rapp, 1827 as the type species of <i>Anoplodoris</i>. Because <i>Anoplodoris</i> and <i>Archidoris</i> are based on the same type species they are objective synonyms.</p> <p> Odhner (1926) described the genus <i>Austrodoris</i> based on <i>Archidoris rubescens</i> Bergh, 1898. According to this author, <i>Austrodoris</i> differs from <i>Doris</i> and <i>Archidoris</i> by having short, wide nonattached salivary glands. In the following years, there was a great deal of confusion between the name <i>Archidoris</i> and <i>Austrodoris</i>, but in general (with a few exceptions) the former was used for species from the northern hemisphere and the latter for species from the southern hemisphere, regardless of the anatomical features of the animals described. Wägele (1990) redescribed the genus <i>Austrodoris</i> and concluded that all species previously described are synonyms of <i>Austrodoris kerguelenensis</i> (Bergh, 1884). She also maintained the usage of the genus <i>Austrodoris</i>, which differs from <i>Archidoris</i> by having most of the deferent duct covered with a muscular sheath, lacking a glans penis and having the seminal receptacle and the bursa copulatrix inserting opposite and not serially on the vaginal duct. The examination of the type species of the genera <i>Doris</i> and <i>Archidoris</i> has revealed that they also have these features. Thus, there are no consistent differences between these taxa that justify the maintenance of different genus names.</p> <p> Baba (1938) described the genus <i>Neodoris</i> based on <i>Neodoris tricolor</i> Baba, 1938, the type species by original designation, as different from <i>Doris</i>, <i>Archidoris</i> and <i>Anisodoris</i>. According to Baba (1938) the main distinctive feature of this genus is the absence of a glans penis. He considered <i>Neodoris</i> to be closely related to <i>Austrodoris</i> and <i>Archidoris</i>, but distinguishable by having a prostate gland and band-like salivary glands. Later, Baba (1998) recognized that <i>Neodoris</i> is a synonym of <i>Archidoris</i>, and suggested that <i>Austrodoris</i> could be a synonym as well.</p> <p> Marcus (1955) described the genus <i>Siraius</i> for <i>Siraius ilo</i> Er. Marcus, 1955 from Brazil. He characterized this new genus by the presence of hook-shaped lateral and pectinate marginal teeth, short and grooved oral tentacles, short and wide salivary glands, tubular prostate and penis unarmed.</p> <p> Kay & Young (1969) introduced the genus <i>Doriorbis</i> for a misidentification of <i>Doris nucleola</i> Pease, 1860 (see remarks on <i>Doris immonda</i> Risbec, 1928). They characterized this new genus as having simply pinnate branchial leaves arranged as a circlet about a posterior anus, hamate radular teeth with the outermost laterals denticulate, and a Y- or T-shaped medial streak extending from the rhinophores to the middorsum. According to Article 70.3 (ICZN, 1999) if the type species of a nominal genus is found to be misidentified an author may select and fix as the type species the species that will, in his or her judgement, best serve stability. In this case the selection of <i>Doris immonda</i> as the type species clearly serves stability better, as <i>Doris nucleola</i> in the sense of its original description (Pease, 1860) is an unidentifiable species, which has well-developed oral tentacles and probably belongs to a different genus.</p> <p> Brodie & Willan (1993) redescribed <i>Doris immonda</i> (as <i>Doris nucleola</i>) and considered that it belongs to the genus <i>Siraius</i> Er. Marcus, 1955. Therefore <i>Doriorbis</i> became a synonym of <i>Siraius</i>. At the same time, they distinguished <i>Siraius</i> from other cryptobranch dorids on the basis of two synapomorphies, the presence of papillae of unequal size around the rhinophoral sheaths, and pectinate outermost lateral teeth. The first character does not have, in my opinion, much phylogenetic significance, and the second is also present in other species of <i>Doris</i>, such as <i>D. pseudoargus</i>. Brodie & Willan (1993) considered <i>Siraius</i> to be closely related to <i>Etidoris</i> Ihering, 1886; which is a synonym of <i>Thordisa</i> Bergh, 1877 (see below). Baba (1998) regarded <i>Siraius</i> as a different genus on the basis of the presence of pectinate outermost teeth.</p> <p> The genus <i>Doriopsis</i> was introduced by Pease (1860) based on <i>Doriopsis granulosa</i>. Pease (1860) justified the creation of a new genus on the basis of the arrangement of the gill, which has the leaves ‘disposed in the form of a semicircle, on the posterior portion of the back, and retractile into a similarly formed slit, the convex portion posteriorly’. Four years later, Alder & Hancock (1864) introduced the new genus <i>Doridopsis</i>, which has the same features as <i>Dendrodoris</i> Ehrenberg, 1831 (see Valdés <i>et al</i>., 1996), and only one letter difference from the name <i>Doriopsis</i> Pease, 1860. Later, Pease (1871a) reaffirmed his genus name <i>Doriopsis</i> as valid and different from <i>Doridopsis</i>. He also argued that <i>Doridopsis</i> should be considered invalid, to avoid confusion with <i>Doriopsis</i>, and erected the replacement name <i>Hanstellodoris</i> Pease, 1871 for it. However, Bergh (1876) regarded <i>Doriopsis</i> and <i>Doridopsis</i> as synonyms, not in the meaning of Pease (1860) but in the meaning of Alder & Hancock (1864), and accepted <i>Doriopsis</i> as the valid name of the genus. This opinion was accepted by most authors in the following years, and <i>Doriopsis</i> was regarded as a junior synonym and a member of the Porostomata (radulaless dorids). O’Donoghue (1924) considered that Ehrenberg’s name <i>Dendrodoris</i> was valid, and treated <i>Doriopsis</i> and <i>Doridopsis</i> as junior synonyms of the former. Pruvot-Fol (1931) suggested for the first time since Pease (1860, 1871a) that <i>Doriopsis</i> is not a synonym of <i>Dendrodoris</i>, but a distinct genus that should be place in the family Archidorididae. On the other hand, <i>Doridopsis</i> is currently regarded as a synonym of <i>Dendrodoris</i> (Valdés <i>et al</i>., 1996).</p> <p> Probably unaware of Pease’s (1860) work, Eliot (1907) described the new subgenus <i>Ctenodoris</i> Eliot, 1907 to include <i>Staurodoris pecten</i> Eliot 1906 and <i>Doris flabellifera</i> Cheesman, 1881. Baba (1937) subsequently selected <i>Staurodoris pecten</i> Eliot, 1906 to be the type species. According to Eliot (1907) the main distinctive feature of <i>Ctenodoris</i> is the structure of the gill, which has the leaves ‘arranged in a line of crescent, and the upper lip of the pocket shuts down over them like a single valve’. This description is very similar to that of <i>Doriopsis</i>, and these two names are clearly synonyms. The genus <i>Guyonia</i> was described by Risbec (1928) on the basis of <i>Guyonia flava</i> Risbec, 1928, <i>Doris pecten</i> Collingwood, 1881 and <i>Doriopsis viridis</i> Pease, 1861. <i>Guyonia flava</i> is here designated as the type species. Risbec (1928) described <i>Guyonia</i> as having the general shape of a <i>Platydoris</i>, with small papillae on the dorsum. Radula with unicuspid teeth and penis unarmed. Gill formed of pinnate leaves inserted anteriorly to the anus and forming an convex arch that is retractile under a semicircular lamellae. This description fits with the characteristics of <i>Doriopsis</i>. Baba & Hamatani (1961) regarded <i>Ctenodoris</i> and <i>Guyonia</i> as synonyms of <i>Doriopsis</i> for the first time.</p> <p> The phylogenetic analysis carried out in this paper clearly shows that <i>Doriopsis</i> is a derived member of the clade containing the members of the genus <i>Doris</i>. If <i>Doriopsis</i> is maintained as a separate genus, <i>Doris</i> becomes paraphyletic. The same would probably occur for the rest of the synonyms of <i>Doris</i> if more species were included in the analysis.</p>Published as part of <i>Valdés, Ángel, 2002, A phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the cryptobranch dorids (Mollusca, Nudibranchia, Anthobranchia), pp. 535-636 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 136 (4)</i> on pages 540-543, DOI: 10.1046/j.1096-3642.2002.00039.x, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/4634200">http://zenodo.org/record/4634200</a>
Women's Institute Celebrates Centennial
No full textNewspaper Article - 'Women's Institute Celebrates Centennial' - Voice of Bowden - March 18, 1997AWI CollectionH
M CO NJ U> F
• 3 * 1 NJ £
CO > \
H vo T
t- l
R
C
H
3
3
Of PER COPY PRINTED WEEKLY VOLUME IX NUMBER 11 TUESDAY, MARCH 18, 1997 BOWDEi
WOMEN'S INSTITUTE
CELEBRATE CENTENIAL
The Cottonwood Women's Institute was chartered on lanuary 3,1935.
APPLIED By: COTTONWOOD W . L
Dne hundred years of Women's
istitutes was celebrated at the
ottonwood - Gordon Hall on
ebruary 19, 1997 by the
OTTONWOOD WOMEN'S INSTITUTE
embers and guests.
A tasty supper was served
illowed by a fact and fun history
of times and changes since the
first meeting which was
organized by Adelaide Hoodless
and held on February 19,1987
in Stoney Creek, Ontario.
Musical selections by the lovely
choir brought back memories
of yesteryears. A Klondike
character, a Charleston dancer,
and even Elvis, who put in a
surprise appearance, added to
the fun.
Alberta Women's Institutes
President, Doris Northey was a
special guest. Cottonwood W. I.
President, Blanche Cunningham
presented Dorothy Webb with a
branch life- membership.
FOUNDED 1909
This Alberta Women's Institute Banner will be shown in
Hamilton, Ontario at the Federated Women's Institute
inlune, 1997. From l- r: Alberta W. I. President, Doris
Northey, Red Deer; Molly Fagen, senior member at
Cottonwood; and Blanche Cunningham, President of
Cottonwood W. I
Institute celebrates 80 years
No full textNewspaper Article - 'Institute celebrates 80 years' - The Camrose Canadian, June 24, 1998AWI CollectionInstitute celebrates 80 vears • - THE CAMROSE CANADIAN June 24, 1998
On June 7, 1998 a crowd
gathered in the Round Hill
Community Hall to celebrate
the 80th Anniversary
of Round Hill Women's
Institute.
A short program was
enjoyed with President
Dianne Campbell as
emcee.
History of the 80 years of
the Institute, which began
with the first meeting in a
tent August 6, 1918 was
given by Marion Burnstad,
Annie Banack, Jeanne
Campbell, Edith Blades,
Doreen Haugen and Doris
Powell, each of which was
dressed in the period
depicted.
Louisa Undin, Dena
Storms and Ethel Rude did
a humorous skit ordering
eggs to make angel food
cakes and egg salad sandwiches
for a W. I. meeting
lunch.
Presentation of Service
Awards was
Alberta Vice
Mildred Luz.
Doris Powell received her
Branch Life Membership.
Years of Service
Certificates were presented
by Dianne Campbell and
Doris Powell.
Greetings were received
from M. L. A. LeRoy
made by
President,
Johnson, M. L. A. Albert
Klapstein, Prime Minister
Jean Chretien, Premier
Ralph Klein, M. P. Jack
Ramsay, Vern Peterson on
behalf of Camrose County,
Jim Prost on behalf of the
Elks, Bernie vonTettenborn
from Trondhjem Lutheran
Church, Round Hill Ag.
Society, Lougheed,
Heather Brae, Ohaton,
Women's Institutes as well
as local greetings from
individuals in the community.
Members were presented
with corsages from the
Round Hill Elks. Bouquets
from Transfiguration of our
Lord Ukrainian
Catholic Church
and the R. H. Ag.
Society.
Special guests on
hand to enjoy the
celebration were
A. W. I. President,
Doris Northy;
Maxine Brigley,
President Elect;
Mildred Luz
Alberta Vice
President; Marcella
Bacso, District # 3
Director; Kay
Sastard, District # 1
Director; and new
E x e c u t i v e
Secretary of
A. W. I., Mae
Deams. A number
of former W. I.
members were welcomed
from B. C.
and various parts of
Alberta.
Life members
Irene Campbell
and Marion
Burnstad cut the
Anniversary cake
which was made
and decorated by
Doris Powell.
The afternoon
concluded with a
buffet supper
which was made
" he Round Hill Women's Institute manufactured this symbolic and served by our
ignpost containing the name of every current member. It rep- Round Hill W. I.
esents 475 years of dedication to the group. members.
Women's Institute members in the back row; from left to right, are: ( 28 years);
Dianne Campbell - President; ( 2) Lynne Erickson; ( 14) Linda Chrystian; ( 10)
Doreen O'Brien; ( 15) Alice Kushnerick; ( 13) Doris Pasynyck; ( 21) Dena Storms; ( 4)
Carol Haugen - Secretary; ( 30) Annie Banack; ( 3) Esther Pack; ( 19) Louisa Undin;
( 14) Ethel Rude; ( 20) Doris Powell; and ( 3) Rose Campbell. In the front row, left to
right, are: ( 32) Laurelee Blades; ( 34) Doreen Haugen; ( 33) Edith Blades; ( 45)
Marion Burnstad; ( 41) Jeanne Campbell - Treasurer; and ( 24) Lucie Owen.
Members missing from picture are: ( 12) Shirley Bawden; ( 11) Cathi Naherniak; ( 45)
Irene Campbell; and ( 1) Elaine Zeniuk
A follow-up study of job permanence for mentally retarded graduates of Luther J. Price high school, 1980
No full textErratum: Dallago et al. Keeping dairy cows for longer: A critical literature review on dairy cow longevity in high milk-producing countries. Animals 2021, 11, 808
No full textA comparative analysis of the attitudes of black male and black female college students toward suicide, 1990
No full textThe intent of this study was to examine the degree to which general beliefs about suicide, personal closeness/ beliefs, religious beliefs toward suicide and general knowledge influences the attitudes of black college males and females toward suicide.The subjects of this study were 32 participants;17 were black female and 15 were black male college students who attend Clark Atlanta University. The instrument used in the comparative study was a 34 item, self-administered questionnaire which was designed by the researcher and adapted from Suicide Opinion Questionnaire designed by George Domino colleges. A series of questions were developed using both a Likert scale and a True/False measurement of responses.The analysis was completed utilizing the statistical package for the Social Sciences X (SPSSX). The t-test was used to test significance differences. The results of this study found that there is no statistically significant difference in the attitudes of black male and black female college students toward suicide.It can be concluded that the attitudes of Black male and Black female college students toward suicide is guided by general beliefs about suicide, personal closeness/beliefs, religious beliefs toward suicide, and general knowledge about suicide
Sahagún y los orfebres precolombinos de México.. Anales del Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia. Num. 38 Tomo IX (1955) Sexta Época (1939-1966)
No full textBennett, Wendell C. Peruvian Gold, Natural History (Nueva York, 1932) Tomo XXXII, No. 1, p. 28.Cellini, Benvenuto. Due Trattati.... uno dell' Oreficeria, l'altro della Scultura, 1568 (Florencia, edición de 1731) pp. 112, 115, 118, 120.Easby, Dudley T., Jr. Ancient American Goldsmiths, Natural History (Nueva York, 1956) Tomo LXV, No. 8, pp. 406, 407-408.Easby, Dudley T., Jr. Orfebrería y Orfebres Precolombinos, Anales del Instituto de Arte Americano (Buenos Aires, 1956) Tomo IX, pp. 9-26.Garibay, Angel María. Llave del Nahuatl (Otumba, México, 1940).Garland, H. y Bannister, C. O. Ancient Egyptian Metallurgy (Londres, 1927) pp. 35-54.Gowland, W. Metals and Metal-Working in Old Japan, Trans. and Proceedings of The Japan Society (Londres, 1915) Tomo XIII, pp. 41-42.Joyce, T. A. South American Archaeology (Londres, 1912) p. 41.Martínez Gracida, Manuel. Minería y su Industria, XI° Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, 1895 (México, D. F., 1897) p. 433.Maryon, Herbert. Metalwork and Enamelling (3ª ed., Londres, 1954) pp. 200-223, 258.Molina, Alonso de. Vocabulario en Lengua Castellana y Mexicana, 1571 (Madrid, edición de 1944) Tomo IV de la Colección de Incunables Americanos.Motolinía, Toribio de. Historia de los Indios de la Nueva España (Editorial Chávez Hayhoe, México, D. F., 1941) pp. 239, 243-244.Pérez de Barradas, José. Les Indiens de l'Eldorado (París, 1955) pp. 150-151.Rivet P. y Arsandaux, H. La Métallurgie en Amerique précolombienne, Travaux et Mémoires de l'Institut d'Ethnologie (París, 1946) Tomo 39, pp. 124-131.Root, William C. Gold-Copper Alloys in Ancient America, Journal of Chemical Education, Feb. 1951, pp. 76-78, que contiene un resumen de los experimentos de Paul Bergsöe relativos a mise en couleur.Sahagún, Bernardino de. Historia General de las Cosas de Nueva España (edición de A. M. Garibay K., Editorial Porrúa, México, D. F., 1956) Tomo III, pp. 67-72.Saville, Marshall H. The Goldsmith's Art in Ancient Mexico ( Heye Foundation, Nueva York, 1920) pp. 125-142.Seler, Eduard. L'Ortevrerie des anciens Mexicains, VIII Congrés lnternational des Américanistes. 1890 (Paris, 1892) pp. 402-418.Stone, Doris. Orfebrería Pre-Colombina, Catálogo del Museo Nacional (San José de Costa Rica, Abril de 1951) p. 8, fig. 4 a-b.Zerda, Liborio. El Dorado, 1883 (Bogotá, edición de 1948) pp. 39-42, 47-49, 133-134
Do desamparo à dor de existir na poesia de Flobela Espanca: alguns apontamentos
No full textDissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia, Florianópolis, 2014.A questão central dessa pesquisa é se a dor que Florbela descreve em seus versos poéticos tem como motivo o que Freud denominava desamparo. Trabalhamos aqui as relações do desamparo freudiano com a dor de existir na perspectiva teórica psicanalítica. A poesia de Florbela Espanca apresentada ilustra as relações do desamparo com a dor de existir. Utilizou-se do método de análise discursiva de base psicanalítica, extraindo dos trechos poéticos sentidos coerentes com essa perspectiva de análise. Realizamos uma revisão bibliográfica do tema do desamparo na teoria freudiana. Examinando os poemas escritos de 1903 a 1917, constatamos que o desamparo e a dor de existir apresentam-se na posição melancólica nas personagens da poesia de Florbela Espanca.Abstract : This text aims to discuss some effects of "Helplessness" (the Freudian idea of "Hilflosigkeit") in Florbela Espanca's poetry. Examining the author's discourse from a psychoanalytic point of view, the work tries to make the pain that the Portuguese author often describes in her verses understandable. The main conclusion is that Florbela's characters show helplessness and existential pain in a way that is typical of the melancholic position
- …
