1,720,970 research outputs found

    On dynamic monopolies of graphs with general thresholds

    No full text
    AbstractLet G be a graph and τ:V(G)→N be an assignment of thresholds to the vertices of G. A subset of vertices D is said to be dynamic monopoly (or simply dynamo) if the vertices of G can be partitioned into subsets D0,D1,…,Dk such that D0=D and for any i=1,…,k−1 each vertex v in Di+1 has at least t(v) neighbors in D0∪⋯∪Di. Dynamic monopolies are in fact modeling the irreversible spread of influence such as disease or belief in social networks. We denote the smallest size of any dynamic monopoly of G, with a given threshold assignment, by dyn(G). In this paper, we first define the concept of a resistant subgraph and show its relationship with dynamic monopolies. Then we obtain some lower and upper bounds for the smallest size of dynamic monopolies in graphs with different types of thresholds. Next we introduce dynamo-unbounded families of graphs and prove some related results. We also define the concept of a homogeneous society that is a graph with probabilistic thresholds satisfying some conditions and obtain a bound for the smallest size of its dynamos. Finally, we consider dynamic monopoly of line graphs and obtain some bounds for their sizes and determine the exact values in some special cases

    More relations between λ\lambda-labeling and Hamiltonian paths with emphasis on line graph of bipartite multigraphs

    Get PDF
    This paper deals with the λ\lambda-labeling and L(2,1)L(2,1)-coloring of simple graphs. A λ\lambda-labeling of a graph GG is any labeling of the vertices of GG with different labels such that any two adjacent vertices receive labels which differ at least two. Also an L(2,1)L(2,1)-coloring of GG is any labeling of the vertices of GG such that any two adjacent vertices receive labels which differ at least two and any two vertices with distance two receive distinct labels. Assume that a partial λ\lambda-labeling ff is given in a graph GG. A general question is whether ff can be extended to a λ\lambda-labeling of GG. We show that the extension is feasible if and only if a Hamiltonian path consistent with some distance constraints exists in the complement of GG. Then we consider line graph of bipartite multigraphs and determine the minimum number of labels in L(2,1)L(2,1)-coloring and λ\lambda-labeling of these graphs. In fact we obtain easily computable formulas for the path covering number and the maximum path of the complement of these graphs. We obtain a polynomial time algorithm which generates all Hamiltonian paths in the related graphs. A special case is the Cartesian product graph KnKnK_n\Box K_n and the generation of λ\lambda-squares.Comment: 20 pages, 7 figures, accepted pape

    First-Fit coloring of Cartesian product graphs and its defining sets

    Get PDF
    Let the vertices of a Cartesian product graph GHG\Box H be ordered by an ordering σ\sigma. By the First-Fit coloring of (GH,σ)(G\Box H, \sigma) we mean the vertex coloring procedure which scans the vertices according to the ordering σ\sigma and for each vertex assigns the smallest available color. Let FF(GH,σ)FF(G\Box H,\sigma) be the number of colors used in this coloring. By introducing the concept of descent we obtain a sufficient condition to determine whether FF(GH,σ)=FF(GH,τ)FF(G\Box H,\sigma)=FF(G\Box H,\tau), where σ\sigma and τ\tau are arbitrary orders. We study and obtain some bounds for FF(GH,σ)FF(G\Box H,\sigma), where σ\sigma is any quasi-lexicographic ordering. The First-Fit coloring of (GH,σ)(G\Box H, \sigma) does not always yield an optimum coloring. A greedy defining set of (GH,σ)(G\Box H, \sigma) is a subset SS of vertices in the graph together with a suitable pre-coloring of SS such that by fixing the colors of SS the First-Fit coloring of (GH,σ)(G\Box H, \sigma) yields an optimum coloring. We show that the First-Fit coloring and greedy defining sets of GHG\Box H with respect to any quasi-lexicographic ordering (including the known lexicographic order) are all the same. We obtain upper and lower bounds for the smallest cardinality of a greedy defining set in GHG\Box H, including some extremal results for Latin squares.Comment: Accepted for publication in Contributions to Discrete Mathematic

    Results on the Grundy chromatic number of graphs

    No full text
    AbstractGiven a graph G, by a Grundy k-coloring of G we mean any proper k-vertex coloring of G such that for each two colors i and j, i<j, every vertex of G colored by j has a neighbor with color i. The maximum k for which there exists a Grundy k-coloring is denoted by Γ(G) and called Grundy (chromatic) number of G. We first discuss the fixed-parameter complexity of determining Γ(G)⩾k, for any fixed integer k and show that it is a polynomial time problem. But in general, Grundy number is an NP-complete problem. We show that it is NP-complete even for the complement of bipartite graphs and describe the Grundy number of these graphs in terms of the minimum edge dominating number of their complements. Next we obtain some additive Nordhaus–Gaddum-type inequalities concerning Γ(G) and Γ(Gc), for a few family of graphs. We introduce well-colored graphs, which are graphs G for which applying every greedy coloring results in a coloring of G with χ(G) colors. Equivalently G is well colored if Γ(G)=χ(G). We prove that the recognition problem of well-colored graphs is a coNP-complete problem

    A new vertex coloring heuristic and corresponding chromatic number

    Get PDF
    One method to obtain a proper vertex coloring of graphs using a reasonable number of colors is to start from any arbitrary proper coloring and then repeat some local re-coloring techniques to reduce the number of color classes. The Grundy (First-Fit) coloring and color-dominating colorings of graphs are two well-known such techniques. The color-dominating colorings are also known and commonly referred as {\rm b}-colorings. But these two topics have been studied separately in graph theory. We introduce a new coloring procedure which combines the strategies of these two techniques and satisfies an additional property. We first prove that the vertices of every graph GG can be effectively colored using color classes say C1,,CkC_1, \ldots, C_k such that (i)(i) for any two colors ii and jj with 1i<jk1\leq i< j \leq k, any vertex of color jj is adjacent to a vertex of color ii, (ii)(ii) there exists a set {u1,,uk}\{u_1, \ldots, u_k\} of vertices of GG such that ujCju_j\in C_j for any j{1,,k}j\in \{1, \ldots, k\} and uku_k is adjacent to uju_j for each 1jk1\leq j \leq k with jkj\not= k, and (iii)(iii) for each ii and jj with iji\not= j, the vertex uju_j has a neighbor in CiC_i. This provides a new vertex coloring heuristic which improves both Grundy and color-dominating colorings. Denote by z(G)z(G) the maximum number of colors used in any proper vertex coloring satisfying the above properties. The z(G)z(G) quantifies the worst-case behavior of the heuristic. We prove the existence of {Gn}n1\{G_n\}_{n\geq 1} such that min{Γ(Gn),b(Gn)}\min \{\Gamma(G_n), b(G_n)\} \rightarrow \infty but z(Gn)3z(G_n)\leq 3 for each nn. For each positive integer tt we construct a family of finitely many colored graphs Dt{\mathcal{D}}_t satisfying the property that if z(G)tz(G)\geq t for a graph GG then GG contains an element from Dt{\mathcal{D}}_t as a colored subgraph. This provides an algorithmic method for proving numeric upper bounds for z(G)z(G)

    On irreversible spread of influence in edge-weighted graphs

    Get PDF
    Various kinds of spread of influence occur in real world social and virtual networks. These phenomena are formulated by activation processes and irreversible dynamic monopolies in combinatorial graphs representing the topology of the networks. In most cases, the nature of influence is weighted and the spread of influence depends on the weight of edges. The ordinary formulation and results for dynamic monopolies do not work for such models. In this paper we present a graph theoretical analysis for spread of weighted influence and mention a real world example realizing the activation model with weighted influence. Then we obtain some extremal bounds and algorithmic results for activation process and dynamic monopolies in directed and undirected graphs with weighted edges

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    More algorithmic results for problems of spread of influence in edge-weighted graphs with and without incentives: More algorithmic results for problems of spread of influence

    No full text
    Many phenomena in real-world social networks are interpreted as the spread of influence between activated and non-activated elements within the network. These phenomena are formulated by combinatorial graphs, where vertices represent the elements and edges represent social ties between elements. A main problem is to study important subsets of elements (target sets or dynamic monopolies) such that their activation spreads to the entire network. In edge-weighted networks, the influence between two adjacent vertices depends on the weight of their edge. In models with incentives, the main problem is to minimize the total amount of incentives (called optimal target vectors) that can be offered to vertices such that some vertices are activated and their activation spreads to the whole network. Algorithmic study of target sets and vectors is a hot research field. We prove an inapproximability result for optimal target sets in edge-weighted networks, even for complete graphs. Some other hardness and polynomial time results are presented for optimal target vectors and degenerate threshold assignments in edge-weighted networks. Lastly, we obtain a hardness result for target sets in edge-weighted tournaments

    Bounds for the Grundy chromatic number of graphs in terms of domination number

    Get PDF
    For any graph GG, the Grundy (or First-Fit) chromatic number of GG, denoted by Γ(G)\Gamma(G) (also χFF(G)\chi_{_{\sf FF}}(G)), is defined as the maximum number of colors used by the First-Fit (greedy) coloring of the vertices of GG. Determining the Grundy number is NPNP-complete, and obtaining bounds for Γ(G)\Gamma(G) in terms of the known graph parameters is an active research topic. By a star partition of GG we mean any partition of V(G)V(G) into say V1,,VkV_1, \ldots, V_k such that each G[Vi]G[V_i] contains a vertex adjacent to any other vertex in ViV_i. In this paper using the star partition of graphs we obtain the first upper bounds for the Grundy number in terms of the domination number. We also prove some bounds in terms of the domination number and girth of graphs.Comment: 16 pages, 5 figures, accepted for publication in Bolletin of the Belgian Mathematical Societ
    corecore