1,720,962 research outputs found
Библиотечное документоведение
Full text linkThe article is a follow-up of the previous publications by Yu. N. Stolyarov “Documentology: The backgrould and development” and “The basic postulates of documentology as the general theory of documents”. The author substantiates the need for developing the library documentology as an individual discipline with its specific subject, specific document definition, and specific content. The subjects of library document studies are the primary and secondary document; technological document; accompanying document; and administrative document (record). The library workflows are based on procedural documents that form the class of administrative documents that ensure the optimal functioning of the library. Administrative documents in the library, as in other legal entities, are grouped into large subclasses: planning, accounting, reporting, personnel, financial documents, etc. Among them, the managerial documents are mostly important as they are to support the entire management process. Beside these subclasses, the accompanying documentation forms the subclass that makes an essential part of the collection, namely technological, and administrative documentation. To separate the fundamental library concepts of the document, the author proposes to adopt a specific definition for each document process. The library collection document is information specific for the library that is fixed or to be fixed. Fixed information refers to the diachronous, discrete documents, information to be fixed (continuously and to be continuously updated) refers to synchronous (existing at the time of retrieval), continuous (having only the beginning) document. The author defines library documentation as the systematized collection of internal documents. The tasks and purpose of these documents are determined by the specific of library technological tasks and functions. The author insists on developing the key provisions and, above all, the terms of library documentology.Статья логически продолжает и развивает тематику ранее опубликованных статей Ю. Н. Столярова «Документология: причины появления, этапы развития» и «Исходные постулаты документологии – всеобщей теории документа». В этой статье автор обосновывает необходимость разработки библиотечного документоведения как имеющего собственный предмет, собственное определение документа, собственное особенное содержание. Предметом библиотечного документоведения выступают первичный и вторичный документы, технологический, сопроводительный документы и административный документ (Record). На основе технологических документов строятся все рабочие процессы библиотеки; административные документы обеспечивают её оптимальное функционирование. Административные документы в библиотеке, как и в другом юридическом лице, разделяются на большие подклассы: плановые, учётные, отчётные, кадровые, финансовые и т.п. Важнейшие среди них – управленческие документы, обеспечивающие весь процесс руководства учреждением. В отдельный подкласс выделяется сопроводительная – обязательная составная часть и фондовой, и технологической, и административной документации. Для того чтобы развести основополагающие понятия документа в библиотечной сфере, автор предлагает: принять их специфические определения для каждого документского процесса: Документ библиотечного фонда – профильная для данной библиотеки зафиксированная и/или фиксируемая информация. Под зафиксированной информацией имеется в виду диахронный, дискретный документ, под фиксируемой (непрерывно, с постоянным обновлением) – синхронный (существующий в момент воспроизведения), континуальный (имеющий только начало) документ, а под библиотечной документацией – понимать упорядоченное собрание служебных документов. Цель создания и назначение этих документов определяется спецификой тех или иных производственных библиотечных задач и функций. Автор призывает начать разработку ключевых положений и прежде всего терминов библиотечного документоведения
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Библиотечная терминология: теоретико-методологические подходы к созданию
Full text linkThe author responds to the article by Elena I. Kozlova and Valentina A. Tsvetkova "Terminological aspects in the processes of standardization of library and information activities" (published in the journal "Scientific and technical libraries", № 3, 2020) devoted to the draft state standard of basic terms and definitions of library and information activities. The author objects to their interpretation of mathematical induction method in formal logic, by which they justify the attempt to standardize the concept of "library and information activities". Through this method, the opposite result would be achieved; redundancy or even artificiality of the proposed phrase is demonstrated consequentially. The author argues that, within the framework of the Federal Law "On librarianship", the term "library and information activity" as proposed for federal standardization along with the term "information and library activity" as it appears in the current standard, are both wrongful. The author also criticizes other theoretical and methodological provisions proposed by the state standard writers.The author suggests to improve the system of standards for information, library and publishing (SIBID) by segregating the competence areas of information, library and publishing activities, without mixing them in any proportion or combination. SIBID must comprise the concepts of "library" and "publishing", since these terms are embedded in the name of the system and, therefore, they make the original reference points. The terminology set must be based on the key terms of laws and other national regulatory and legal acts, though the definitions of these terms may differ, and even radically differ, from those fixed in legal acts where they convey juridical conceptions while the standard is to regulate their professional, scientific, and practical meaning, which indeed completely corresponds to the legal interpretation. The author introduces the following approach to these general terms: since the library system is essentially of document and communicative character, the key concepts of the system shall form its foundation: library, librarianship, document, library collection, reader (user), reader (user) group, material and technical resources of library, library re-source studies, library model, library collection model, and other general terms within the discipline.Статья представляет собой отклик на статью Е. И. Козловой и В. А. Цветковой «Терминологические аспекты в процессах стандартизации библиотечно-информационной деятельности» (см.: «Науч. и техн. б-ки», 2020 г., № 3). Автор возражает против трактовки метода математической индукции в формальной логике, которым авторы рассматриваемой статьи оправдывают попытку стандартизировать понятие «библиотечно-информационная деятельность». Этим методом достигается прямо противоположный результат: с логической последовательностью демонстрируется излишность или даже искусственность предлагаемого словосочетания. Показано, что с точки зрения Федерального закона «О библиотечном деле» предлагаемый к государственной стандартизации термин «библиотечно-информационная деятельность», равно как и фигурирующий в действующем стандарте термин «информационно-библиотечная деятельность», являются незаконными. Критикуются и другие теоретико-методологические положения разработчиков ГОСТа.Предложения автора статьи сводятся к тому, чтобы усовершенствовать систему стандартов по информационному, библиотечному и издательскому делу (СИБИД), чётко разведя в ней области своей компетенции – информационное, библиотечное и издательское дело, не смешивая их ни в каких пропорциях и комбинациях. СИБИД должна содержать понятия «библиотечное дело» и «издательское дело», поскольку эти термины заложены в наименование системы и, следовательно, являются исходными. В основу терминологического ряда должны быть положены ключевые термины законов и иных нормативно-правовых актов общегосударственного значения, но определения этих терминов могут, и даже радикально, отличаться от зафиксированных в правовых актах: там эти определения несут правовую нагрузку, а стандартом регулируется их профессиональное, научное, практическое понимание, – разумеется, в полной мере соответствующее юридической трактовке. Предложен подход к перечню таких общих терминов: поскольку библиотека – система по своей сущности документо-коммуникативная, в основу общих терминов должны быть положены ключевые понятия этой системы: библиотека, библиотечное дело, документ, библиотечный фонд, читатель (пользователь), контингент читателей (пользователей), материально-техническая база библиотеки, библиотечное материально-техническое ресурсоведение, модель библиотеки, модель библиотечного фонда и подобные термины общебиблиотечного характера
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
