1,721,112 research outputs found

    Electrochemical characterization of small organic hole-transport molecules based on the triphenylamine unit

    No full text
    [[abstract]]A series of substituted triphenylamine-containing organic compounds are synthesized and their hole-transport properties are examined by electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical methods. Several substituted tirphenylamines exhibited irreversible electron-transfer reactions both in the oxidative and reductive scan. On the other hand, the cyclic voltammograms of the p-phenylenediamine series are well defined. N,N'-bis(4-nitrophenyl)-N,N'-diphenyl-1,4-phenylenediamine (NPD) exhibited two reversible oxidation redox couples at +1.00 and +1.28 V vs. Ag/AgCl in dichloromethane solution. There is one reversible reduction redox couple at -1.12 V and one irreversible wave with E-p,E-c at -1.87 V. Cyano-substituted p-phenylenediamine (CPD) exhibited similar oxidation redox couples. Amino-substituted p-phenylenediamine (APD) is easier to oxidize than NPD and CPD. APD exhibits two reversible oxidation redox couples at +0.40 and +0.70 V and two extra irreversible oxidation waves at +1.26 and +1.52 V. Optically transparent thin-layer electrode (OTTLE) coupled with UV/Vis/NIR spectroscopy was used to examine the oxidation products of the above reactions. The electrogenerated cation and dication of the substituted p-phenylenediamine are very stable in the spectroelectrochemical studies. Oxidation of the compound APD exhibited a distinguished absorption pattern, which is different from those of compound NPD and compound CPD. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.[[note]]SC

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore