1,721,839 research outputs found

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Xunzi Yang Liang zhu yan jiu

    No full text
    蘇澤民."2006年12月"論文(哲學碩士)--香港中文大學, 2006.參考文獻(leaves 121-126)."2006 nian 12 yue"Abstracts in Chinese and English.Su Zemin.Lun wen (zhe xue shuo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2006.Can kao wen xian (leaves 121-126).Chapter 第一章 --- 緒論 --- p.1Chapter 第一節 --- 硏究目的及範圍 --- p.2Chapter 第二節 --- 關於荀卿之生平及其著述 --- p.3Chapter 第三節 --- 關於楊倞及其《荀子注》 --- p.6Chapter 第二章 --- 楊倞《注》的體例 --- p.8Chapter 第一節 --- 襲用前代注釋典籍之材料 --- p.8Chapter 第二節 --- 闡釋義理 --- p.11Chapter 第三節 --- 輯錄別本異文 --- p.13Chapter 第四節 --- 引錄佚說 --- p.14Chapter 第三章 --- 楊倞《注》徵引《莊子》考論 --- p.16Chapter 第一節 --- 唐代莊學盛行與楊倞引用《莊子》作注之關係 --- p.17Chapter 第二節 --- 楊倞用《莊子》注《荀子》述例 --- p.19Chapter 一、 --- 名物訓詁 --- p.19Chapter 二、 --- 闡釋義理 --- p.24Chapter 三、 --- 對《荀子》內容作出補充 --- p.29Chapter 第三節 --- 楊倞用《莊子》作注所見《莊子》與《荀子》 在用語及思想上之關係 --- p.32Chapter 一、 --- 《荀子》部分用語受《莊子》影響 --- p.33Chapter 二、 --- 莊子與荀、孟思想之異同 --- p.36Chapter 第四節 --- 小結 --- p.46Chapter 第四章 --- 楊倞以「仁義禮智信」注思孟五行辨 --- p.49Chapter 第一節 --- 思孟五行諸家解說槪述 --- p.51Chapter 第二節 --- 《¯‘ة書´Ø洪範》「五行」、「五事」與思孟五行之關係 --- p.54Chapter 第三節 --- 《周易´Ø乾文言》與《太玄´Ø玄數》 所見五行與五常之關係 --- p.61Chapter 第四節 --- 從《中庸》看思孟五行與五常之關係 --- p.67Chapter 第五節 --- 小結 --- p.75Chapter 第五章 --- 楊倞對儒家統緒承傳問題之立場 --- p.78Chapter 第一節 --- 從楊倞引韓愈著述看其對韓愈統緒觀之認同 --- p.79Chapter 第二節 --- 引錄揚雄著述,標明其與荀卿之關係 --- p.86Chapter 第六章 --- 楊倞改易《荀子》篇章次第析論 --- p.91Chapter 第一節 --- 改易〈賦篇 > 及〈成相〉次第 --- p.92Chapter 第二節 --- 將性質相同的篇章置於一類 --- p.95Chapter 第三節 --- 始〈勸學〉而終〈堯問〉 --- p.96Chapter 第七章 --- 結論 --- p.98附錄附錄一楊倞《注》徵引各種篇籍數量表 --- p.101附錄二 楊倞《注》徵引《莊子》表 --- p.104附錄三 楊倞《注》徵引韓愈著述表 --- p.115附錄四 楊倞《注》徵引揚雄著述表 --- p.117附錄五 《太玄´Ø玄數》五方配五行、四時、五常示意圖 --- p.120附錄六參考書目 --- p.12

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore