1,721,269 research outputs found
The Distribution and Grammatical Functions of ‘Suo’ ‘Xu’ ‘Chu’ in medieval Chinese
No full text本文以東漢至魏晉南北朝的佛經及《世說新語》等中土文獻作為語料，觀察表處所的「所」、「許」、「處」位於「名詞／代詞＋Ｘ」結構中的用法，分析它們之間的異同。指出在佛經文獻裡，「所」基本已發展為「方位詞」的用法，「許」則在東晉以後演變為表領屬功能的「助詞」，至於「處」則仍保留名詞的功能。在中土文獻裡，後置詞「許」在《世說新語》當中仍以表達處所為主要功能，但在其他幾部著作則沒有相同的用法。「所」與「處」則差別不大，仍屬於處所名詞的用法，兩者以「處」的使用範圍較廣，因而在《周氏冥通記》與《真誥》裡面，「處」逐漸取代了「所」。
This article analyzes the similarities and differences on grammatical functions and semantic representations of ＂suo＂ ＂xu＂ ＂chu＂ on the basis of the twenty three Buddhist Scriptures and six Chinese literatures in Eastern Han and Six Dynasties. We focused on the syntactic structure that ＂suo＂ ＂xu＂ ＂chu＂ were added to noun or pronoun and found that in this structure ＂suo＂ had been changed to be locative in Buddhist Scriptures. On the other hand, because of the phenomenon that there are a lot of ＂noun/pronoun + xu＂ appeared in the Judgment Sentence, which means the location word ＂xu＂ had changed to possessive in Buddhist Scriptures after Eastern Jin Dynasty. But in the ＂SHISHUOXINYU＂ it was still a noun of place word. As for ＂chu＂, whether the Buddhist Scriptures or Chinese literatures, it was used as a noun. ＂Suo＂ is also a noun in Chinese literatures. There are no differences between ＂suo＂ and ＂chu＂ except ＂chu＂ was used more widely. So it seems that ＂chu＂ had replaced ＂suo＂ gradually in the ＂ZHOUSHI-MINGTONGJI＂ and ＂ZHENGAO＂補正完
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
The Research of Place Words “Suo”、 “Xu”、“Chu”、“Bian” in Medieval Chinese
No full text計畫編號：NSC101-2410-H032-093
研究期間：201208~201307
研究經費：262,000中古漢語上承上古漢語，下啟近代漢語，在整個漢語語法史的發展過程中，扮演著非常 重要的角色，而處所詞的演變，是研究漢語空間範疇演變的一大課題，其中就「所」、「許」、 「處」、「邊」等詞來說，它們都可以出現在人稱名詞之後，構成「人稱＋X」（X 指這四個詞 可出現的位置）的結構，同時「所」、「許」、「處」也都可以與疑問代詞「何」結合，構成「何 所」、「何許」、「何處」等疑問處所代詞的用法，顯然這四個表達方所概念的詞在中古漢語裏 具有某種共同的特點，而此一共同特點在中古漢語裏是否具有語法功能與語義表達上的差 異，它們之間的使用情形是因為歷時發展變化的結果，還是共時的地域差異所造成的現象， 這些問題則需要比對更多的語料來進行深入的探論。本計畫即是著眼此思考角度而初步提出 「中古漢語處所詞『所』『許』『處』『邊』的功能與演變」之主題，希望透過語料的分析、歸 納，對中古漢語這幾個處所詞的語法結構與功能，有更透徹的研究。The Medieval Chinese plays an extremely important role in the history of Chinese grammar. Carrying the grammatical features of Archaic Chinese, the Medieval Chinese had a profound influence on the developments of Late Medieval period. The evolution of place word is one of the major themes for the research of Ancient Chinese. Characters like “suo”, “xu”, “chu” and “bian” could be used after the personal pronoun, while “suo”, “xu” and “chu” are often combined with the word“he” to form pronouns such as“he suo”“he xu” and“he chu”. While the research studies the certain commonality shared by these characters in the Middle Chinese, it also aims to discover the differences in their grammatical functions and semantic representations. The objective of the study is to find out whether the phenomenon was the result of diachronic evolution or of the synchronic differences of different dialects. The project we will focus on is titled“The Research of place words “suo”, “xu”, “chu” and “bian” in Medieval Chinese”行政院國家科學委員
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
