1,723,529 research outputs found
香港中文大學圖書館中國古籍庫
No full text[V.1- 3]. 前集 : 十卷 -- [v.4-7]. 後集 : 十四卷 -- [v.8-9]. 續集 : 八卷 -- [v.10-12]. 別集. 下 : 十三卷 -- [v.13-15]. 別集 : 十三卷 -- [v.16-19]. 外錄 : 十七卷.[V.1- 3]. Qian ji : shi juan -- [v.4-7]. Hou ji : shi si juan -- [v.8-9]. Xu ji : ba juan -- [v.10-12]. Bie ji. Xia : shi san juan -- [v.13-15]. Bie ji : shi san juan -- [v.16-19]. Wai lu : shi qi juan.朱熹纂集 ; 李衡校正. 皇朝名臣言行錄 : 續集八卷, 別集[二十六卷] / 李幼武纂集. 皇朝道學名臣言行外錄 : 十七卷 / 李幼武纂集.綫裝, 5函.框22.6x15.7公分, 11行21字. 上下黑口, 雙黑魚尾, 四周雙邊. 版心中鐫集次及卷次, 下鐫葉次.版式據前集第四卷首半葉.出書年及出書地據跋.有李胤跋.《皇朝名臣言行錄. 別集》分兩集, 每集十三卷."香港中文大學圖書館中國古籍庫"提供電子版.鈐有"德幽", "順"印.Library's copy: 本館所藏第一冊為手抄補缺, 其餘內文間有手抄補缺.Xian zhuang, 5 han.Kuang 22.6 x 15.7 gong fen, 11 hang 21 zi. Shang xia hei kou, shuang hei yu wei, si zhou shuang bian. Ban xin zhong juan ji ci ji juan ci, xia juan ye ci.Ban shi ju qian ji di si juan shou ban ye.Chu shu nian ji chu shu di ju ba.You Li Yin ba."Huang chao ming chen yan xing lu. Bie ji" fen liang ji, mei ji shi san juan.Zhu Xi zuan ji ; Li Heng jiao zheng. Huang chao ming chen yan xing lu : xu ji ba juan, bie ji [er shi liu juan] / Li Youwu zuan ji. Huang chao dao xue ming chen yan xing wai lu : shi qi juan / Li Youwu zuan ji."Xianggang Zhong wen da xue tu shu guan Zhongguo gu ji ku" ti gong dian zi ban.Qian you "De you", "Shun" yin.Library's copy: ben guan suo zang di yi ce wei shou chao bu que, qi yu nei wen jian you shou chao bu que
Corporate governance in Chinese listed companies: how managerial characteristics matter?
Full text linkThis thesis consists of three studies on corporate governance issues of
Chinese listed companies. In the first study, I investigate the role of board
secretaries in management earnings forecasts. Individuals in this senior
executive position are responsible for coordinating information disclosure. I
find that their legal and accounting expertise and foreign experience help
improve management earnings forecast quality. The quality of forecasts, as
indicated by forecast occurrence, frequency, precision and accuracy, is
positively associated with board secretaries’ duality role and equity holdings,
whereas it is negatively associated with their political connections. The quality
of forecasts is found to increase the compensation of board secretaries.
Finally,
I show that the equity holdings of board secretaries reduce litigation risks and
increase corporate philanthropic giving.
Based on the notion that women cooperate more with women than with
men, my second study examines the gender interaction effect between female
top managers and female board directors in Chinese firms. I show that this
gender interaction is positively associated with the firm’s accounting return but
negatively associated with its stock price return. Earnings management, which
can lead to overstated accounting numbers but unfavourable stock market
reactions, partly explains the opposite results. Furthermore, I find that only the
newly appointed female top managers engage in this earnings management.
Overall, the findings suggest that the pressure on women to perform leads to
‘women helping women’, which is detrimental to shareholders’ value.
Women are underrepresented on corporate boards. By employing the
large variation in socioeconomic development across provinces of China, the
third study shows that the barriers to board gender diversity are deeply rooted
in societal gender role attitudes. I find that corporate boards tend to be more
gender diverse in a province where there is a smaller gender difference in
educational achievement in STEM disciplines, where there is a stronger belief
that women and men possess equal intrinsic abilities, or where female political
leaders are present in the provincial government or communist party.
However,
I find little evidence that female labour force participation or childcare provision
would affect board gender diversity. Collectively, the findings suggest that it is
the gender equality attitudes rather than the supply of average female labour
that contribute to gender-diverse corporate boards
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
