1,721,577 research outputs found

    Helicobacter pylori eradication in the prevention of gastric cancer

    No full text
    Gastric cancer remains one of the top cancer killers in the World. Chronic Helicobacter pylori infection increases the risk of gastric cancer, by stepwise progression from chronic active gastritis to gastric atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and finally cancer. These stepwise progressions may take many years, and at present there is no proven effective treatment for the presence of premalignant lesions including intestinal metaplasia or dysplasia. Hence the two prevailing questions in gastric cancer prevention are (a) whether treatment of H. pylori-related gastritis can reduce the risk of gastric cancer, and (b) whether treatment of H. pylori-related IM or dysplasia can both reverse the premalignant lesions and reduce the risk of gastric cancer. Our randomized placebo controlled trial in China started in year 1994 included both patients with H. pylori related gastritis and patients with H. pylori related premalignant lesions (1). After 7.5 years of follow up, patients receiving H. pylori treatment showed a non-significant trend of having less gastric cancer than those patients that received placebo. The sub-group analysis showed that patients with H. pylori related gastritis benefited most from treatment, with no cancer developing in 7.5 years. However, in patients with H. pylori related premalignant lesions, there was no difference in the risk of gastric cancer in both treatment and placebo groups. Hence our study suggests that the benefit of treating H. pylori in cancer prevention may be restricted to patients with gastritis only. Correa et al. performed another randomized placebo controlled trial in Columbia which included mainly patients with H. pylori- related premalignant lesions (2). Their 12- year follow up result suggested that subjects who were H. pylori negative after treatment had 14.8% more regression and 13.7% less progression than patients who were positive at 12 years (p=0.001). Hence he concludes that it is beneficial to treat H. pylori in patients with premalignant lesions. However the magnitude of benefit may be in the range of 15% only. Based on these and other studies, the recommendation is that treatment of H. pylori is beneficial in prevention of gastric cancer. The benefit is greater in patients without premalignant lesions. Hence treatment earlier in life may give better results. 1 Wong BCY, Lam SK, Wong WM et al: Helicobacter pylori eradication to prevent gastric cancer in a high-risk region in China: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 291(2): 187-194, 2004. 2 Mera R, Fontham ET, Bravo LE et al: Long term follow up of patients treated for Helicobacter pylori infection. Gut 54: 1536, 2006

    The journey towards Helicobacter pylori eradication: from bench to the frontline

    No full text
    published_or_final_versionabstractMedicineDoctoralDoctor of Philosoph

    Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Chinese: its management and impact

    No full text
    published_or_final_versionabstractMedicineDoctoralDoctor of Philosoph

    Helicobacter pylori and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in gastric carcinogenesis

    No full text
    published_or_final_versionabstractMedicineDoctoralDoctor of Philosoph

    Targeting cell signaling pathway in treatment of gastric cancer by chemotherapeutic agents

    No full text
    The Best PhD Thesis in the Faculties of Dentistry, Engineering, Medicine and Science (University of Hong Kong), Li Ka Shing Prize,2001-2003published_or_final_versionMedicineDoctoralDoctor of Philosoph

    Anti-tumor mechanisms of cyclooxygenase inhibitors and a c-Jun-N-terminal kinase inhibitor in gastrointestinal cancers

    No full text
    published_or_final_versionabstracttocMedicineMasterMaster of Philosoph

    Textbook of Internal Medicine

    No full text

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
    corecore