1,720,994 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Randomized clinical trial investigating the efficacy of self-administered interventions for reducing pathological academic worry
Get PDFtextDespite the ostensible prevalence of academic worry at the college and university level, there is a paucity of research in this area. In addition, there is an even greater dearth of research investigating treatments for excessive and uncontrollable academic worry. Further, the research on non-pharmacological treatment strategies for reducing pathological worry (as seen in its most severe form in generalized anxiety disorder; GAD) is limited. The primary goal of this study was to investigate the potential benefits of two self-administered interventions for reducing pathological academic worry. Participants experiencing pathological academic worry (N = 113) were randomized to one of four conditions: (a) worry exposure (WE), (b) expressive writing (EW), (c) a credible placebo control, consisting of pulsed audio-photic stimulation (APS), and (d) wait-list control (WLC). Participants were instructed to practice their interventions three times per week for one month. Participants in all three of the intervention conditions showed significant improvement on self-report measures, while no such changes were observed for the control group. Findings were mixed on the objective measures. In general, neither the WE nor EW conditions consistently outperformed placebo, and in some cases, EW failed to outperform the waitlist control group at post-treatment. Overall, those assigned to WE showed greater improvement than those assigned to EW at posttreatment, but few significant differences between the three intervention groups emerged at follow-up. These mixed findings suggest that either the efficacy of each of the treatments does not go beyond the that which would be expected of non-specific treatment effects, or that the pulsed audio-photic stimulation did in fact exert more of an effect than a typical placebo, suggesting there may have been an unanticipated active treatment component. Despite this, several participants in WE and EW showed marked improvement, and even continued improvement by follow-up, suggesting that, while perhaps not highly potent treatments when delivered in isolation, these may be easy, costeffective interventions for pathological worry. Further research is needed with clinical GAD samples, and research is also needed on the placebo response rate in GAD.Psycholog
The Role of positive and negative aspects of life events in depressive and anxiety symptoms
No full textNegative or stressful life events are robust risk factors for depression and anxiety. Less attention has been paid to the positive aspects of events and whether positivity buffers the impact of the negative aspects of events. In this study, we examined the positivity and negativity of interpersonal and noninterpersonal episodic life events in predicting anxiety and depressive symptoms in a sample of 373 young adults. Regressions tested the main and interactive effects of positivity and negativity ratings of events in predicting symptom factors (fears, anhedonia-apprehension, general distress) relevant to anxiety and depression. A significant interaction demonstrated that positivity protected against high levels of negativity of noninterpersonal events in predicting general distress. A main effect of interpersonal negativity predicting higher anhedonia-apprehension was observed. Results for fears were nonsignificant. Findings suggest that the positivity of life events may buffer against negativity in predicting symptoms shared between anxiety and depression.</p
Recommended from our members
A multi-method investigation of the acquisition and treatment of pathological fear
Get PDFAbstract: Over the course of their lifetime, about 25% of the U.S. population will meet criteria for one or more of the anxiety-related disorders, all of which are characterized by pathological fear responding. Researchers have made significant strides in improving treatment efficacy through the development of cognitive-behavioral models for understanding the acquisition and treatment of pathological fear. Although cognitive-behavioral treatments produce marked reductions in pathological fear on average, a subgroup of patients do not respond to treatment. In an effort to improve the prevention and treatment of pathological fear, this dissertation synthesizes data from a series of studies aimed to (a) improve our understanding of factors that contribute to the development of pathological fear in a real-world setting (Study 1), (b) examine factors that influence response to exposure therapy, a technique used across gold-standard treatments pathological fear (Study 2), and (c) investigate novel strategies that could be added to exposure therapy to further improve treatment response (Study 3). Specifically, Study 1 demonstrates the contribution of cognitive appraisal (i.e., threat perception) to the onset of pathological fear in response to stressors encountered in a real-world, high-stress environment (warzone deployment). Study 2 is a meta-analysis exploring the influence of unnecessary protective actions, or safety behaviors (SBs), on outcomes of exposure therapy. Data demonstrate that removing SBs during exposure therapy improves treatment outcomes, whereas adding SBs during exposure therapy produces inferior outcomes under certain conditions, such as when treating specific phobia symptoms. Finally, Study 3 is a randomized clinical trial investigating the use of two behavioral strategies, alone and in combination, to enhance exposure therapy outcomes: (1) a brief pre-exposure fear memory reactivation trial (PE-FMR) and (2) deepened extinction. Results suggest that neither PE-FMR nor deepened extinction improve outcomes at post-treatment or one-week follow-up. However, PE-FMR augmentation produced more rapid fear reduction during treatment, and equivalent outcomes even when the duration of exposure therapy (tailored to speed of fear reduction) was shorted by 21% on average. Together, these lines of research contribute to our understanding of cognitive and behavioral influences on the development and treatment of pathological fear.Psycholog
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
