1,721,605 research outputs found
The refusal of poligamy in the Western world: The reasons
No full textThis article peruses the 1,850 year tradition of Western laws against polygamy and the recent developments in the field. It shows how the traditional Western cases against polygamy and same-sex unions used strikingly different arguments drawn from the Bible, nature, rights, harm, and symbolism. Because these arguments are so different, Western nations can responsibly hold the line against polygamy, even if they choose to accept same-sex marriage and its accompanying norms of sexual liberty, domestic autonomy, equality, and nondiscrimination
Influenza Vaccination Coverage Rates in Germany
No full textDamm O, Krefft A, Witte J, Batram M, Greiner W. Influenza Vaccination Coverage Rates in Germany. Value in health. 2020;23(Suppl. 2):S563
Who's Next? The Impact of Ranked Substitution on Budget Impact Model Uncertainty
No full textRehse H, Gruhn S, Witte J, Batram M, Greiner W. Who's Next? The Impact of Ranked Substitution on Budget Impact Model Uncertainty. Value in Health. 2024;27(12, Suppl.):S100
Inpatient Burden of Influenza in the Elderly in Germany
No full textDamm O, Kramer R, Witte J, Batram M, Greiner W. Inpatient Burden of Influenza in the Elderly in Germany. In: Emerging Frontiers and Opportunities. Value in Health . Vol 25. Elsevier ; 2022: S86
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
