1,721,093 research outputs found
Replication of Bats, balls, and substitution sensitivity: cognitive misers are no happy fools
No full textIt is replication of Bats, balls, and substitution sensitivity: cognitive misers are no happy fools (Wim De Neys & Sandrine Rossi & Olivier Houdé, 2013) which was made for Social Psyhology course by Sociology and Social Informatics students from HSE University in Saint-Petersburg, Russi
Replication of Bats, balls, and substitution sensitivity: cognitive misers are no happy fools
No full textIt is replication of Bats, balls, and substitution sensitivity: cognitive misers are no happy fools (Wim De Neys & Sandrine Rossi & Olivier Houdé, 2013) which was made for Social Psyhology course by Sociology and Social Informatics students from HSE University in Saint-Petersburg, Russi
Replication of Bats, balls, and substitution sensitivity: cognitive misers are no happy fools
No full textIt is replication of Bats, balls, and substitution sensitivity: cognitive misers are no happy fools (Wim De Neys & Sandrine Rossi & Olivier Houdé, 2013) which was made for Social Psyhology course by Sociology and Social Informatics students from HSE University in Saint-Petersburg, Russi
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
The freak in all of us: Logical truth seeking without argumentation
No full textAbstractMercier and Sperber (M&S) sketch a bleak picture of logical reasoning in classic, nonargumentative tasks. I argue that recent processing data indicate that despite people's poor performance they at least seek to adhere to traditional logical norms in these tasks. This implies that classic reasoning tasks are less artificial–and logical reasoning less exceptional–than M&S's framework suggests.</jats:p
Counterexample retrieval and inhibition during conditional reasoning: Direct evidence from memory probing
No full text- …
