1,720,961 research outputs found
Chronic pain in primary care. German figures from 1991 and 2006
No full textAbstract Background Until now only limited research has been done on the prevalence of chronic pain in primary care. The aim of this investigation was to study the health care utilisation of patients suffering from pain. How many patients visit an outpatient clinic because of the symptom of pain? These data were compared with data from a similar study in 1991, to investigate whether improvements had been achieved. Methods A total of 1201 consecutive patients visiting outpatient clinics were surveyed in six practices in the western part of Germany on randomly selected days by means of questionnaires. Topics were the point prevalence of pain and the period prevalence of chronic pain, its characteristics and its impact on daily life, as well as data on previous therapies for pain. A retrospective comparison was made with the data from a similar study with same design surveying 900 patients that took place in five practices during 1991. Results In 2006, pain was the main reason for consulting a doctor in 42.5% of all patients (1991: 50.3%). Of all respondents, 62% suffered from pain on the particular day of the consultation, and 40% reported that they had been suffering from pain for more than six months (1991: 36.4%). As many as 88.3% of patients with chronic pain reported a negative impact on their daily life due to this pain (1991: 68%), and 88.1% reported impairment of their working life because of chronic pain (1991: 59.1%). Conclusion Pain, and chronic pain in particular, is a central problem in primary care. Over the last 15 years, the number of patients suffering from chronic pain has not decreased. In nearly half of all cases, pain is still the reason for health care utilisation in outpatient clinics. Pain represents a major primary health care problem with enormous impact on public health. Improvements can only be achieved by improving the quality of health care at the primary care level.</p
Chronische Schmerzen in deutschen Facharztpraxen
No full textThe prevalence of chronic pain as related to the supply situation in primary care has been investigated insufficiently. A questionnaire was used to collect data of 1,201 patients in 6 different specialists' practices (general medicine, surgery, internal medicine, neurology, oncology, orthopaedics). The questions posed related to socio-demographic facts, pain characteristics, psychosocial effects, previous therapies and their subjective effectiveness. Pain was the reason for consulting a doctor in nearly 50% of the patients; 40% of all respondents complained about chronic pain, defined as recurrent or constant pain lasting longer than 6 months. As many as 90% of these subjects reported psychosocial impairment due to chronic pain and 25% evaluated their therapies as ineffective. Chronic pain is a major problem in primary care. The high level of suffering and the enormous socioeconomic impact on public health demand consequences. Improvements in undergraduate and postgraduate training are urgently required for both an adequate pain treatment and the prevention of chronic pain
Long-Term Opioid Use in Non-Cancer Pain
No full textBackground: The long-term use of opioid analgesic drugs to treat chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is a major component of pain pharmacotherapy. The interpretation of the evidence concerning its efficacy and risks is currently debated. Methods: An interdisciplinary evidence-and consensus-based S3 guideline was updated on the basis of a systematic literature search (CENTRAL, Medline, and Scopus databases, from October 2008 to October 2013); meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (>= 4 weeks); and a consensus procedure, as specified by the AWMF regulations, including 22 medical and psychological societies and 2 patient self-help organizations. Results: 119 publications were used to update the guideline, and 6 systematic reviews with meta-analyses were performed. A nominal group process was used to formulate recommendations concerning the indications and contra indications for the treatment of CNCP with opioid analgesics and the manner in which such treatments should be carried out. Opioid analgesics are an option for the short-term treatment (4-12 weeks) of chronic pain due to osteoarthritis (pain intensity, standardized mean difference [ SMD]: -0.22 and -0.26), diabetic polyneuropathy (SMD -0.74), post-herpetic neuralgia (SMD -0.58), and chronic low back pain (SMD: -0.29 and -0.74). Long-term opioid treatment (>= 26 weeks) for these diseases benefits only about 25% of patients. For other conditions, either short- or long-term treatment with opioid analgesics should be considered an individual therapeutic trial. Opioid treatment for pain is contraindicated by primary headaches and by any functional or mental disorder of which pain is a leading manifestation. Conclusion: To minimize the risks of opioid analgesic treatment, physicians must be aware of its contraindications and must regularly reassess its efficacy and side effects. Pharmacotherapy should be combined with other types of treatment.Mundipharma company; Grunenthal company; Janssen-Cilag; Pfize
Empfehlung zur Klassifikation schmerztherapeutischer Einrichtungen in Deutschland
No full textOn behalf of the German chapter of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) recommendations for German pain treatment services have been developed for the first time. The criteria were based on the IASP recommendations but adapted to the specific German situation. According to the structure and process criteria four different levels of pain treatment services can be distinguished. The aim of the recommendations is to serve as a guide for future development and implementation of pain therapy and quality assurance
Recommendations of the updated LONTS guidelines. Long-term opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain
No full textThe regular update of the German S3 guidelines on long-term opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP), the"LONTS" (AWMF registration number 145/003), began in November 2013. The guidelines were developed by 26 scientific societies and two patient self-help organisations under the coordination of the Deutsche Schmerzgesellschaft (German Pain Society). A systematic literature search in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline and Scopus databases (up until October 2013) was performed. Levels of evidence were assigned according to the classification system of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. The strength of the recommendations was established by multistep formal procedures, in order to reach a consensus according to German Association of the Medical Scientific Societies ("Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlich Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften", AWMF) regulations. The guidelines were reviewed by the Drug Commission of the German Medical Association, the Austrian Pain Society and the Swiss Association for the Study of Pain. Opioids are one drug-based treatment option for short- (4-12 weeks), intermediate- (13-25 weeks) and long-term (a parts per thousand yenaEuro parts per thousand 26 weeks) therapy of chronic osteoarthritis, diabetic polyneuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia and low back pain. Contraindications are primary headaches, as well as functional somatic syndromes and mental disorders with the (cardinal) symptom pain. For all other clinical presentations, a short- and long-term therapy with opioid-containing analgesics should be evaluated on an individual basis. Long-term therapy with opioid-containing analgesics is associated with relevant risks (sexual disorders, increased mortality). Responsible application of opioid-containing analgesics requires consideration of possible indications and contraindications, as well as regular assessment of efficacy and adverse effects. Neither an uncritical increase in opioid application, nor the global rejection of opioid-containing analgesics is justified in patients with CNCP
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
- …
