1,720,953 research outputs found
Ask for help: Online help-seeking and engagement for college students traditionally underrepresented in STEM
Help-seeking is a successful self-regulated learning strategy that is essential for student success. Still, students, especially those traditionally underrepresented in STEM (UR-STEM) and, in particular, chemistry (UR-Chem), may be reluctant to employ it. Students with longstanding under-representation in STEM and chemistry are non-males, first-generation college students, and AHN students (i.e., African American, Hispanic, Native American). Understanding UR-STEM students’ help-seeking in online courses is crucial for developing equitable learning environments where students can engage with a community of inquiry. This research explored help-seeking in an online college-level STEM course discussion forum in two separate investigations, utilizing different analytic techniques. The first investigation used social network analysis to examine various forum engagement measures concerning course improvement and UR-STEM status. Findings demonstrated that help-seeking was predictive of improvement, thus lending support for the utility of help-seeking for favorable learning outcomes. The second investigation explored the nature of help-seeking and help-giving in the discussion board with particular attention to UR-Chem students. Findings revealed that requests for help were equally responded to regardless of how explicitly students appealed for help. Furthermore, we found that UR-STEM students requested and responded to help similarly and received help at greater rates than their non-UR-Chem peers. Results suggest that online courses may mitigate barriers to help-seeking.Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2023-05-01The student, Destiny Williams-Dobosz, accepted the attached license on 2021-04-14 at 16:45.The student, Destiny Williams-Dobosz, submitted this Thesis for approval on 2021-04-14 at 16:52.This Thesis was approved for publication on 2021-04-15 at 16:47.DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #16335 on 2021-09-16 at 17:03:10Made available in DSpace on 2021-09-17T02:34:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2
WILLIAMS-DOBOSZ-THESIS-2021.pdf: 1033166 bytes, checksum: a71095e3adbec90f531cf7032a270dbd (MD5)
LICENSE.txt: 4220 bytes, checksum: eb766a3a894828f5c890f867db91775f (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2021-04-15Embargo set by: Seth Robbins for item 118515
Lift date: 2023-09-17T02:34:57Z
Reason: Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD systemAuthor requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD systemU of I Onl
Resilient Yet Vulnerable: Understanding the Psychosocial Experiences of Black Women First-Generation College Students in STEM
Submission published under a 24 month embargo labeled 'U of I Access', the embargo will last until 2027-05-01The student, Destiny Williams-Dobosz, accepted the attached license on 2025-04-18 at 14:54.The student, Destiny Williams-Dobosz, submitted this Dissertation for approval on 2025-04-18 at 15:16.This Dissertation was approved for publication on 2025-04-21 at 16:23.DSpace SAF Submission Ingestion Package generated from Vireo submission #21837 on 2025-10-19 at 19:15:10The ontological experiences (realities and ways of being) and epistemologies (ways of knowing) of underserved and marginalized populations are not one-dimensional. This research aimed to explore how Black women who are first-generation college students (FGCSs) navigate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). As an educational psychologist who researches help-seeking and learning in STEM for numerically underrepresented and minoritized students, I became frustrated reading deficit-based approaches to research. This frustration brought me to the quote, “Black women are simultaneously vulnerable and resilient in the face of systematic inequality” (Evans-Winters, 2019). From this liminal space, I began a research journey to understand the both-and tension of resilience and vulnerability for Black women FGCSs in STEM. First, I employed autoethnographic storytelling to uncover my developmental trajectory toward graduate studies. As a Black woman, FGCS, and as someone who studied chemistry as an undergraduate, I needed to grapple with my own stories to analyze other stories responsibly. Next, I conducted a single-case interpretative phenomenological analysis of Jane (pseudonym), a Black woman FGCS in computer science, to explore the risk contributors and protective factors to her STEM pursuit. Last, I conducted a cross-case interpretative phenomenological analysis of four Black women FGCSs in STEM to investigate their net vulnerability, stress engagements, and coping mechanisms when seeking academic help. Ultimately, each study reported in this dissertation presents layered and practical insights for instructors, administrators, and students. To address any educational problem effectively, we must first know what is happening, what is working, what is not working, and for whom it is not working
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
