1,723,678 research outputs found
Cotylegaleatidae, a new family of Ploima (Rotifera: Monogononta), for **Cotylegaleata perplexa** gen. et sp. nov., from freshwater benthos of Belgium
No full textDe, Willem H. (2007): Cotylegaleatidae, a new family of Ploima (Rotifera: Monogononta), for Cotylegaleata perplexa gen. et sp. nov., from freshwater benthos of Belgium. Zootaxa 1425: 35-43, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17572
Pledran (Côtes-du-Nord). Camp de Péran
No full textWimmers Willem H. Pledran (Côtes-du-Nord). Camp de Péran. In: Archéologie médiévale, tome 18, 1988. pp. 365-366
Description of Pseudingolfiella possessionis n. sp. (Crustacea, Amphipoda) from sub-Antarctic Île de La Possession, Crozet archipelago: the second freshwater amphipod known from the Antarctic biome, a human introduction of Gondwanan ancestry?
No full textDe Smet, Willem H. (2015): Description of Pseudingolfiella possessionis n. sp. (Crustacea, Amphipoda) from sub-Antarctic Île de La Possession, Crozet archipelago: the second freshwater amphipod known from the Antarctic biome, a human introduction of Gondwanan ancestry? Zootaxa 3941 (2): 221-238, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3941.2.
FIGURE 30. Encentrum valkanovi Althaus. A in Rotifera from the Mediterranean Sea, with description of ten new species
No full textFIGURE 30. Encentrum valkanovi Althaus. A. Female, dorsal; B. toe and caudal antenna, dorsal; C. toe, lateral. Scale bars: A: 50 µm; B−D: 10 µm.Published as part of De Smet, Willem H., 2015, Rotifera from the Mediterranean Sea, with description of ten new species, pp. 151-196 in Zootaxa 4028 (2) on page 189, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4028.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/24055
FIGURE 15. Testudinella patina. A. Lorica, ventral view. B. Lorica, caudal view. C in A review of the marine and brackish-water species of Testudinella (Rotifera: Monogononta, Testudinellidae), with the description of two new species
No full textFIGURE 15. Testudinella patina. A. Lorica, ventral view. B. Lorica, caudal view. C. Distal foot pseudosegment. Scale bars: A, B: 50 µm, C: 25 µm.Published as part of De, Willem H., 2009, A review of the marine and brackish-water species of Testudinella (Rotifera: Monogononta, Testudinellidae), with the description of two new species, pp. 1-20 in Zootaxa 2092 on page 17, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18751
FIGURE 32. Trichocerca pediculus Remane. A in Rotifera from the Mediterranean Sea, with description of ten new species
No full textFIGURE 32. Trichocerca pediculus Remane. A. Female, lateral; B. SEM photographs of trophi, complete set, dorsal; C. detail left incus and uncus, lateral; D. detail right ramus and uncus, lateral. Scale bars: A: 50 µm; B−D: 10 µm.Published as part of De Smet, Willem H., 2015, Rotifera from the Mediterranean Sea, with description of ten new species, pp. 151-196 in Zootaxa 4028 (2) on page 191, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4028.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/24055
Encentrum
No full textEncentrum spp. Two species belonging to the genus Encentrum concern undescribed species judging from their trophi (Figs 27 C, F), but could not be described due to their contracted state and the too low number of specimens.Published as part of De Smet, Willem H., 2015, Rotifera from the Mediterranean Sea, with description of ten new species, pp. 151-196 in Zootaxa 4028 (2) on page 188, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4028.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/24055
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
