1,720,974 research outputs found

    Ramsey multiplicity and the Tur\'an coloring

    Get PDF
    Extending an earlier conjecture of Erd\H{o}s, Burr and Rosta conjectured that among all two-colorings of the edges of a complete graph, the uniformly random coloring asymptotically minimizes the number of monochromatic copies of any fixed graph HH. This conjecture was disproved independently by Sidorenko and Thomason. The first author later found quantitatively stronger counterexamples, using the Tur\'an coloring, in which one of the two colors spans a balanced complete multipartite graph. We prove that the Tur\'an coloring is extremal for an infinite family of graphs, and that it is the unique extremal coloring. This yields the first determination of the Ramsey multiplicity constant of a graph for which the Burr--Rosta conjecture fails. We also prove an analogous three-color result. In this case, our result is conditional on a certain natural conjecture on the behavior of two-color Ramsey numbers.Comment: 39 pages, final version to appear in Advances in Combinatoric

    Upper bounds on diagonal Ramsey numbers [after Campos, Griffiths, Morris, and Sahasrabudhe]

    No full text
    Ramsey\u27s theorem states that if NN is sufficiently large, then no matter how one colors the edges among NN vertices with two colors, there are always kk vertices spanning edges in only one color. Given this theorem, it is natural to ask ``how large is sufficiently large?\u27\u27 Ramsey\u27s original proof showed that N=k!N=k! is sufficient, and five years later Erdős and Szekeres improved this bound to N=4kN=4^k. And then progress stalled for almost 90 years. In this survey, I present the history of the problem and discuss some of the ideas used in the recent breakthrough of Campos--Griffiths--Morris--Sahasrabudhe, who proved that N=3.993kN=3.993^k is sufficient. In addition, I discuss the subsequent work of Balister, Bollobás, Campos, Griffiths, Hurley, Morris, Sahasrabudhe, and Tiba, who gave an alternative, and more conceptual, proof.Expository paper accompanying a Bourbaki seminar talk (November 2024, exposé number 1230). 48 pages. Second version includes the follow-up of Balister et a

    Ramsey numbers upon vertex deletion

    Get PDF
    Given a graph GG, its Ramsey number r(G)r(G) is the minimum NN so that every two-coloring of E(KN)E(K_N) contains a monochromatic copy of GG. It was conjectured by Conlon, Fox, and Sudakov that if one deletes a single vertex from GG, the Ramsey number can change by at most a constant factor. We disprove this conjecture, exhibiting an infinite family of graphs such that deleting a single vertex from each decreases the Ramsey number by a super-constant factor. One consequence of this result is the following. There exists a family of graphs {Gn}\{G_n\} so that in any Ramsey coloring for GnG_n (that is, a coloring of a clique on r(Gn)1r(G_n)-1 vertices with no monochromatic copy of GnG_n), one of the color classes has density o(1)o(1).Comment: 11 page

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Ramsey numbers of books and quasirandomness

    Get PDF
    The book graph B^((k))_n consists of n copies of K_(k+1) joined along a common K_k. The Ramsey numbers of B^((k))_n are known to have strong connections to the classical Ramsey numbers of cliques. Recently, the first author determined the asymptotic order of these Ramsey numbers for fixed k, thus answering an old question of Erdős, Faudree, Rousseau, and Schelp. In this paper, we first provide a simpler proof of this theorem. Next, answering a question of the first author, we present a different proof that avoids the use of Szemerédi's regularity lemma, thus providing much tighter control on the error term. Finally, we prove a conjecture of Nikiforov, Rousseau, and Schelp by showing that all extremal colorings for this Ramsey problem are quasirandom

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
    corecore