1,720,967 research outputs found
Maggot Instructor: Semi-Automated Analysis of Learning and Memory in Drosophila Larvae
No full textFor several decades, Drosophila has been widely used as a suitable model organism to study the fundamental processes of associative olfactory learning and memory. More recently, this condition also became true for the Drosophila larva, which has become a focus for learning and memory studies based on a number of technical advances in the field of anatomical, molecular, and neuronal analyses. The ongoing efforts should be mentioned to reconstruct the complete connectome of the larval brain featuring a total of about 10,000 neurons and the development of neurogenic tools that allow individual manipulation of each neuron. By contrast, standardized behavioral assays that are commonly used to analyze learning and memory in Drosophila larvae exhibit no such technical development. Most commonly, a simple assay with Petri dishes and odor containers is used; in this method, the animals must be manually transferred in several steps. The behavioral approach is therefore labor-intensive and limits the capacity to conduct large-scale genetic screenings in small laboratories. To circumvent these limitations, we introduce a training device called the Maggot Instructor. This device allows automatic training up to 10 groups of larvae in parallel. To achieve such goal, we used fully automated, computer-controlled optogenetic activation of single olfactory neurons in combination with the application of electric shocks. We showed that Drosophila larvae trained with the Maggot Instructor establish an odor-specific memory, which is independent of handling and non-associative effects. The Maggot Instructor will allow to investigate the large collections of genetically modified larvae in a short period and with minimal human resources. Therefore, the Maggot Instructor should be able to help extensive behavioral experiments in Drosophila larvae to keep up with the current technical advancements. In the longer term, this condition will lead to a better understanding of how learning and memory are organized at the cellular, synaptic, and molecular levels in Drosophila larvae.publishe
Editorial: Invertebrate brains as model systems for learning, memory, and recall: development, anatomy and function of memory systems
Full text linkExploring neonicotinoid effects on Drosophila: insights into olfactory memory, neurotransmission, and synaptic connectivity
No full textNeonicotinoid insecticides, the fastest-growing class in recent decades, interfere with cholinergic neurotransmission by binding to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. This disruption affects both targeted and non-targeted insects, impairing cognitive functions such as olfaction and related behaviors, with a particular emphasis on olfactory memory due to its ecological impact. Despite the persistent presence of these chemicals in the environment, significant research gaps remain in understanding the intricate interplay between cognitive function, development, neuronal activity, and neonicotinoid-induced toxicity. This study focuses on the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, chosen for its genetic tractability, well-characterized neural circuitry, and remarkable parallels with bees in neurotransmitter systems and brain structures. Our aim is to establish the fruit fly as a valuable model organism for studying the effects of neonicotinoids on behavior and neuronal circuitry, with particular attention to olfactory memory and associated brain circuitries. To achieve this aim, we conducted experiments to investigate the effects of short-term exposure to sublethal doses of the neonicotinoid imidacloprid, mimicking realistic environmental insecticide exposure, on the formation of odor memories. Additionally, we evaluated synaptic contacts and cholinergic neurotransmission within the mushroom body, the primary memory network of insects. Our results showed significant impairments in odor memory formation in flies exposed to imidacloprid, with exposure during the adult stage showing more pronounced effects than exposure during the larval stage. Additionally, functional studies revealed a decrease in synaptic contacts within the intrinsic olfactory projection neurons and the mushroom body. Furthermore, another experiment showed an odor-dependent reduction in cholinergic neurotransmission within this network. In summary, employing Drosophila as a model organism provides a robust framework for investigating neonicotinoid effects and understanding their diverse impacts on insect physiology and behavior. Our study initiates the establishment of the fruit fly as a pivotal model for exploring neonicotinoid influences, shedding light on their effects on olfactory memory, neuronal integrity, and synaptic transmission
Cognitive limits of larval Drosophila: testing for conditioned inhibition, sensory preconditioning, and second-order conditioning
No full textDrosophila larvae are an established model system for studying the mechanisms of innate and simple forms of learned behavior. They have about 10 times fewer neurons than adult flies, and it was the low total number of their neurons that allowed for an electron microscopic reconstruction of their brain at synaptic resolution. Regarding the mushroom body, a central brain structure for many forms of associative learning in insects, it turned out that more than half of the classes of synaptic connection had previously escaped attention. Understanding the function of these circuit motifs, subsequently confirmed in adult flies, is an important current research topic. In this context, we test larval Drosophila for their cognitive abilities in three tasks that are characteristically more complex than those previously studied. Our data provide evidence for (i) conditioned inhibition, as has previously been reported for adult flies and honeybees. Unlike what is described for adult flies and honeybees, however, our data do not provide evidence for (ii) sensory preconditioning or (iii) second-order conditioning in Drosophila larvae. We discuss the methodological features of our experiments as well as four specific aspects of the organization of the larval brain that may explain why these two forms of learning are observed in adult flies and honeybees, but not in larval Drosophila
Pruning deficits of the developing Drosophila mushroom body result in mild impairment in associative odour learning and cause hyperactivity
No full textThe principles of how brain circuits establish themselves during development are largely conserved across animal species. Connections made during embryonic development that are appropriate for an early life stage are frequently remodelled later in ontogeny via pruning and subsequent regrowth to generate adult-specific connectivity. The mushroom body of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is a well-established model circuit for examining the cellular mechanisms underlying neurite remodelling. This central brain circuit integrates sensory information with learned and innate valences to adaptively instruct behavioural decisions. Thereby, the mushroom body organizes adaptive behaviour, such as associative learning. However, little is known about the specific aspects of behaviour that require mushroom body remodelling. Here, we used genetic interventions to prevent the intrinsic neurons of the larval mushroom body (γ-type Kenyon cells) from remodelling. We asked to what degree remodelling deficits resulted in impaired behaviour. We found that deficits caused hyperactivity and mild impairment in differential aversive olfactory learning, but not appetitive learning. Maintenance of circadian rhythm and sleep were not affected. We conclude that neurite pruning and regrowth of γ-type Kenyon cells is not required for the establishment of circuits that mediate associative odour learning per se, but it does improve distinct learning tasks
Molecular and neuronal mechanisms underlying learning and memory in Drosophila larvae
No full textWhat is learning? How is memory being formed? It seems that learning and memory are different concepts, which nevertheless share a common ground. Like two sides of the same coin. You can not have memory without learning, but you can forget what you have learned. Therefore, establishing a memory is a highly complex and dynamic process. Different molecular changes, structural changes as well as physiological changes within neurons are involved in the process of forming a specific memory (also known as memory trace). It is generally assumed that changes in synaptic transmission is a fundamental cornerstone in the formation of memory and it is conserved throughout the animal kingdom. These changes are either reversible and refer to labile, short-lasting memories, or they are persistent and refer to longer-lasting memories. Persistent memories, by definition, are resistant to anesthetic disruption and require consolidation processes, which in turn require transient changes of intracellular signalling cascades that ultimately lead to de-novo protein synthesis. Thereby changes in intracellular signalling cascades alter synaptic efficiency and provide the feature of transforming learned behaviours into persistent memories. It was shown in Drosophila adults that memory formation after aversive Pavlovian conditioning consolidates from a labile short-term component to a more stable and longer lasting form within in hours. This process requires the timely controlled action of different cellular components. Beside this gradual transition exists another memory component in parallel: an anesthesia resistant memory (ARM), which is resistant to cold shock treatment and independent from the requirement of de-novo protein synthesis. However, the underlying biochemical mechanisms of forming ARM are less characterized. To date, the radish (rsh) gene is the only molecular link to the poorly understood ARM formation. Compared to adult Drosophila, memory formation was only sporadic analyzed at its larval stage and comprehensive analysis of the involved neuronal and molecular mechanisms are still absent. The aim of my work is therefore to analyse the underlying molecular and neuronal mechanisms involved in the formation of learning and memory in Drosophila larvae.publishe
Insulin signaling represents a gating mechanism between different memory phases in Drosophila larvae
No full textThe ability to learn new skills and to store them as memory entities is one of the most impressive features of higher evolved organisms. However, not all memories are created equal; some are short-lived forms, and some are longer lasting. Formation of the latter is energetically costly and by the reason of restricted availability of food or fluctuations in energy expanses, efficient metabolic homeostasis modulating different needs like survival, growth, reproduction, or investment in longer lasting memories is crucial. Whilst equipped with cellular and molecular pre-requisites for formation of a protein synthesis dependent long-term memory (LTM), its existence in the larval stage of Drosophila remains elusive. Considering it from the viewpoint that larval brain structures are completely rebuilt during metamorphosis, and that this process depends completely on accumulated energy stores formed during the larval stage, investing in LTM represents an unnecessary expenditure. However, as an alternative, Drosophila larvae are equipped with the capacity to form a protein synthesis independent so-called larval anaesthesia resistant memory (lARM), which is consolidated in terms of being insensitive to cold-shock treatments. Motivated by the fact that LTM formation causes an increase in energy uptake in Drosophila adults, we tested the idea of whether an energy surplus can induce the formation of LTM in the larval stage. Suprisingly, increasing the metabolic state by feeding Drosophila larvae the disaccharide sucrose directly before aversive olfactory conditioning led to the formation of a protein synthesis dependent longer lasting memory. Moreover, formation of this memory component is accompanied by the suppression of lARM. We ascertained that insulin receptors (InRs) expressed in the mushroom body Kenyon cells suppresses the formation of lARM and induces the formation of a protein synthesis dependent longer lasting memory in Drosophila larvae. Given the numerical simplicity of the larval nervous system this work offers a unique prospect to study the impact of insulin signaling on the formation of protein synthesis dependent memories on a molecular level.publishe
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
