1,721,045 research outputs found
Checklist for depositing training materials into Zenodo
No full textWithin the FAIRsFAIR project we have developed practical guidance in the form of a checklist for depositing training materials in Zenodo, a multi-disciplinary open repository.
This checklist was originally published in: Kayumbi-Kabeya, Gabin, Newbold, Elizabeth, Whyte, Angus, Cepinskas, Linas, & Molloy, Laura. (2021). D6.3 Established Competence Centre for Variety of Communities (1.0 Draft). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4560474
We are republishing it and making it available as a standalone document to facilitate reuse.
This checklist has been adapted from “10 simple rules for making training materials FAIR” by Garcia L., Batut B., Burke M.L., et al. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.100785
Using RISE, an International Perspective
No full textInstitutional readiness in Research Data Management (RDM) services and infrastructure is an important prerequisite for today’s increasingly digitally connected scientific domains. The Research Infrastructure Self-Evaluation Framework (RISE) is a tool to facilitate strategy processes for RDM-support development. Published in 2017 by the Digital Curation Centre (DCC), RISE has been picked up by institutions in the UK, the Netherlands, Belgium, and Germany, among others.Accepted abstract for a Lightning Talk at the 15th International Digital Curation Conference in Dublin , 17 - 20 February 202
FAIR in practice reference list
No full textThis is a collection of information curated by the FAIR Practice Task Force of the EOSC FAIR Working Group.
It aims to provide a reading list of published information on efforts to apply the FAIR principles.
Please read the README tab in the spreadsheet for instructions on how to use this resource.Corresponding author for this deposit is Neil Chue Hon
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Summary report of workshop on training resource metadata testbed
No full textThe workshop on Training Resource Metadata Testbed, took place online on January 19, 2022. It was organised by the FAIRsFAIR project in collaboration with EOSC Future project as a follow up to an earlier meeting held in April 2021 on "harmonising training resource metadata for EOSC Communities".
The workshop engaged the InfraEOSC-5 projects (EOSC-Pillar, ESOC-synergy, NI4OS-Europe, ExPaNDs) as well as representation from related ESFRI Cluster Projects (PaNOSC, SSHOC, ENVRI-FAIR, EOSC-Life - including ELIXR TeSS), EOSC Future and other related initiatives (RDA-IG ETHRD, OpenAIRE).
The workshop goals were three fold:
to discuss the feasibility/extent to which the RDA ETHRD IG minimal metadata elements in the EOSC landscape based on the testbed findings
to feedback any issues identified by the workshop to the RDA ETHRD IG on the application of the metadata set
to discuss and present the use of the Dublin Core Tabular Application Profile method for representing Metadata Application Profiles
This record contains a summary report of the workshop
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
