1,720,975 research outputs found

    Properly integral polynomials over the ring of integer-valued polynomials on a matrix ring

    Get PDF
    AbstractLet D be a domain with fraction field K, and let Mn(D) be the ring of n×n matrices with entries in D. The ring of integer-valued polynomials on the matrix ring Mn(D), denoted IntK(Mn(D)), consists of those polynomials in K[x] that map matrices in Mn(D) back to Mn(D) under evaluation. It has been known for some time that IntQ(Mn(Z)) is not integrally closed. However, it was only recently that an example of a polynomial in the integral closure of IntQ(Mn(Z)) but not in the ring itself appeared in the literature, and the published example is specific to the case n=2. In this paper, we give a construction that produces polynomials that are integral over IntK(Mn(D)) but are not in the ring itself, where D is a Dedekind domain with finite residue fields and n≥2 is arbitrary. We also show how our general example is related to P-sequences for IntK(Mn(D)) and its integral closure in the case where D is a discrete valuation ring

    Non-triviality conditions for integer-valued polynomial rings on algebras

    Get PDF
    Let DD be a commutative domain with field of fractions KK and let AA be a torsion-free DD-algebra such that AK=DA \cap K = D. The ring of integer-valued polynomials on AA with coefficients in KK is \Int_K(A) = \{f \in K[X] \mid f(A) \subseteq A\}, which generalizes the classic ring \Int(D) = \{f \in K[X] \mid f(D) \subseteq D\} of integer-valued polynomials on DD. The condition AKA \cap K implies that D[X] \subseteq \Int_K(A) \subseteq \Int(D), and we say that \Int_K(A) is nontrivial if \Int_K(A) \ne D[X]. For any integral domain DD, we prove that if AA is finitely generated as a DD-module, then \Int_K(A) is nontrivial if and only if \Int(D) is nontrivial. When AA is not necessarily finitely generated but DD is Dedekind, we provide necessary and sufficient conditions for \Int_K(A) to be nontrivial. These conditions also allow us to prove that, for DD Dedekind, the domain \Int_K(A) has Krull dimension 2

    Decomposition of Integer-valued Polynomial Algebras

    Get PDF
    Let DD be a commutative domain with field of fractions KK, let AA be a torsion-free DD-algebra, and let BB be the extension of AA to a KK-algebra. The set of integer-valued polynomials on AA is Int(A)=finB[X]midf(A)subseteqAInt(A) = {f in B[X] mid f(A) subseteq A}, and the intersection of Int(A)Int(A) with K[X]K[X] is IntK(A)Int_K(A), which is a commutative subring of K[X]K[X]. The set Int(A)Int(A) may or may not be a ring, but it always has the structure of a left IntK(A)Int_K(A)-module. A DD-algebra AA which is free as a DD-module and of finite rank is called IntKInt_K-decomposable if a DD-module basis for AA is also an IntK(A)Int_K(A)-module basis for Int(A)Int(A); in other words, if Int(A)Int(A) can be generated by IntK(A)Int_K(A) and AA. A classification of such algebras has been given when DD is a Dedekind domain with finite residue rings. In the present article, we modify the definition of IntKInt_K-decomposable so that it can be applied to DD-algebras that are not necessarily free by defining AA to be IntKInt_K-decomposable when Int(A)Int(A) is isomorphic to IntK(A)otimesDAInt_K(A) otimes_D A. We then provide multiple characterizations of such algebras in the case where DD is a discrete valuation ring or a Dedekind domain with finite residue rings. In particular, if DD is the ring of integers of a number field KK, we show that an IntKInt_K-decomposable algebra AA must be a maximal DD-order in a separable KK-algebra BB, whose simple components have as center the same finite unramified Galois extension FF of KK and are unramified at each finite place of FF. Finally, when both DD and AA are rings of integers in number fields, we prove that IntKInt_K-decomposable algebras correspond to unramified Galois extensions of $K

    Integral Closure of Rings of Integer-Valued Polynomials on Algebras

    Get PDF
    Let DD be an integrally closed domain with quotient field KK. Let AA be a torsion-free DD-algebra that is finitely generated as a DD-module. For every aa in AA we consider its minimal polynomial μa(X)D[X]\mu_a(X)\in D[X], i.e. the monic polynomial of least degree such that μa(a)=0\mu_a(a)=0. The ring \Int_K(A) consists of polynomials in K[X]K[X] that send elements of AA back to AA under evaluation. If DD has finite residue rings, we show that the integral closure of \Int_K(A) is the ring of polynomials in K[X]K[X] which map the roots in an algebraic closure of KK of all the μa(X)\mu_a(X), aAa\in A, into elements that are integral over DD. The result is obtained by identifying AA with a DD-subalgebra of the matrix algebra Mn(K)M_n(K) for some nn and then considering polynomials which map a matrix to a matrix integral over DD. We also obtain information about polynomially dense subsets of these rings of polynomials

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore