36 research outputs found
Age/disease duration influence on activities of daily living and quality of life after levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel in Parkinson's disease
No full text Aim: To determine if age and Parkinson's disease duration at therapy initiation influence the efficacy of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) on quality of life and activities of daily living. Patients & methods: This post hoc analysis assessed subgroups of patients stratified by baseline age, disease duration, hours/day of ‘off’ time and levodopa equivalent dose. Patients’ data were collected from the GLORIA study, a 24-month observational registry evaluating long-term effectiveness of LCIG. Results & conclusion: LCIG therapy led to sustained improvements in quality of life irrespective of patient age and disease duration at baseline. Improvements in activities of daily living were observed across all subgroups, particularly in younger patients, patients with shorter disease duration and in patients with the highest baseline levodopa equivalent dose. </jats:p
Supplement_Inconsistency_Examples_26Jun - Lessons Learned From Multi-regional Trials With Signals of Treatment Effect Heterogeneity
No full textSupplement_Inconsistency_Examples_26Jun for Lessons Learned From Multi-regional Trials With Signals of Treatment Effect Heterogeneity by Gang Li, Hui Quan, Gordon Lan, Soo Peter Ouyang, Fei Chen, Weining Robieson, William Wang, Bruce Binkowitz, Shuai Sammy Yuan, Yoko Tanaka, Josh Chen, Nobushige Matsuoka, Lanju Zhang, Song Yang, and Paul Gallo in Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science</p
Effects of Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel Compared with Optimized Medical Treatment on Nonmotor Symptoms in Advanced Parkinson’s Disease: INSIGHTS Study
No full textBackground. Nonmotor symptoms (NMS) are common in advanced Parkinson's disease (APD) and reduce health-related quality of life. Objective. The aim of the study was to evaluate levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) versus optimized medical treatment (OMT) on NMS in APD. Methods. INSIGHTS was a phase 3b, open-label, randomized, multicenter study in patients with APD (LCIG or OMT, 26 weeks) (NCT02549092). Primary outcomes assessed were total NMS (NMS scale (NMSS) and PD sleep scale (PDSS-2)). Key secondary outcomes included the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II, Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C), and PD Questionnaire-8 (PDQ-8). Additional secondary measures of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS), and Parkinson Anxiety Scale (PAS) also were evaluated. Finally, safety was assessed. Results. Out of 89 patients randomized, 87 were included in the analysis (LCIG, n = 43; OMT, n = 44). There were no significant differences in NMSS or PDSS-2 total score changes (baseline to Week 26) between LCIG and OMT; within-group changes were significant for NMSS (LCIG, p < 0.001; OMT, p=0.005) and PDSS-2 (LCIG, p < 0.001; OMT, p < 0.001). Between-group treatment differences were nominally significant for UPDRS Part II (p=0.006) and CGI-C (p < 0.001) at Week 26 in favor of LCIG; however, statistical significance could not be claimed in light of primary efficacy outcomes. PGIC (Week 26) and KPPS (Week 12) scores were nominally significantly reduced with LCIG versus OMT (p < 0.001; p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in PDQ-8 or PAS. Adverse events (AEs) were mostly mild to moderate; common serious AEs were pneumoperitoneum (n = 2) and stoma-site infection (n = 2) (LCIG). Conclusions. There were no significant differences between LCIG versus OMT in NMSS or PDSS-2; both LCIG and OMT groups significantly improved from baseline. AEs were consistent with the known safety profile
On weighted kappa and concordance correlation coefficient.
No full textOn weighted kappa and concordance correlation coefficient
Safety of Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel Treatment in Patients with Advanced Parkinson's Disease Receiving ≥2000 mg Daily Dose of Levodopa
No full textBackground. Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) provides continuous levodopa administration and clinical benefits to patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). This report evaluates long-term safety and efficacy of high-dose LCIG in PD patients. Methods. Data were collected from several prospective, phase III clinical studies and an observational registry. The phase III program (N = 412) included four multicenter studies: a 12-week, randomized, double-blind study and three open-label studies extending ≥12 months. GLORIA (N = 375) was a 24-month, multicountry, observational registry. LCIG safety (adverse effects (AEs)/adverse drug reactions (ADRs)) and efficacy (modified Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part IV item 32 and 39 scores for "On" time with dyskinesia and "Off" time) were assessed in patients who received ≥2000 mg/day vs <2000 mg/day LCIG. Results. A total of 72 of 412 (17.5%) patients required dosages ≥2000 mg/day LCIG in the phase III program and 47 of 375 (12.5%) patients in GLORIA. Baseline demographics and disease severity were similar between dosage groups with more men in the high-dosage group. Compared with the <2000 mg/day dosage group, patients requiring ≥2000 mg/day LCIG had higher rates of AEs/ADRs including polyneuropathy; improvements in "Off" time and discontinuations due to AEs were similar between dosage groups and lower for discontinuations due to ADRs reported in GLORIA. Conclusions. Patients who require ≥2000 mg/day LCIG exhibited a safety profile comparable to the established safety/tolerability of LCIG with similar clinical improvements. Higher AEs were noted but within what is accepted for LCIG. Continuous administration of LCIG is beneficial to advanced PD patients who require very high doses of levodopa
Statistical considerations in a delayed‐start design to demonstrate disease modification effect in neurodegenerative disorders
No full textSuicidality and divalproex sodium: analysis of controlled studies in multiple indications
No full textAbstract Background Recent analyses of antiepileptic drugs have indicated an increase in the risk of suicidality. The objective of this report was to provide clinical information and an independent meta-analysis of divalproex sodium and suicidality events by analyzing data from 13 placebo-controlled studies and 1 low-dose controlled study. Methods Adverse events considered to be possibly suicide related were identified using the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) methodology. Indications included epilepsy, bipolar disorder, migraine prophylaxis, impulsive aggression, and dementia. Narratives were produced for every event, and suicidality event ratings were performed by a third party blinded to treatment assignment. Statistical analyses were conducted using methodology similar to that reported by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Results Suicidality events were identified in 5 of the 13 placebo-controlled studies. Of the 1,327 (0.83%) subjects taking divalproex sodium, 11 had suicidality events: 2 suicide attempts and 9 suicidal ideation. Of 992 (0.91%) subjects taking placebo, 9 had suicidality events: 1 preparatory act toward suicide, 2 suicide attempts, and 6 suicidal ideation. Across placebo-controlled studies, the overall estimated odds ratio (OR) of suicidal behavior or ideation was 0.72 (95% CI 0.29 to 1.84). The OR for suicidal behavior was 0.37 (95% CI 0.04 to 2.58), and the OR for suicidal ideation was 0.90 (95% CI 0.31 to 2.79). Conclusions In this meta-analysis, divalproex sodium does not appear to increase the risk of suicide-related adverse events relative to placebo in the populations studied. Clinicians should nonetheless remain vigilant in assessing suicidality, not only in patients treated for mental disorders with inherently high suicide risk, but also in patients taking antiepileptic medications.</p
O1–06–03: Efficacy and safety of the alpha7 agonist ABT‐126 in mild‐to‐moderate Alzheimer's dementia
No full textA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 study of α4β2 agonist ABT-894 in adults with ADHD
No full textA phase 2 randomized, controlled trial of the α7 agonist ABT-126 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia
No full textIntroduction The safety and efficacy of the novel α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist ABT-126 were investigated in subjects with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's dementia (AD). Methods Subjects not currently receiving acetylcholinesterase inhibitors were randomized to ABT-126 (5 or 25 mg once daily), donepezil 10 mg once daily, or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline to final evaluation in the 11-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) total score. Results A total of 274 subjects were randomized. Although the study did not meet its primary end point, trends toward improvement were seen with ABT-126 25 mg (least squares mean [standard error] difference from placebo -1.19 [0.90]; one-sided P =.095) and donepezil (-1.43 [0.90]; one-sided P =.057) on the 11-item ADAS-Cog total score change from baseline to the final evaluation. ABT-126 5 mg was numerically similar to placebo. An exposure-response analysis indicated a statistically significant relationship between ABT-126 exposure and the change from baseline in ADAS-Cog, with no evidence of a plateau. No clinically meaningful differences in safety were observed among treatment groups. Discussion Although the ABT-126 25 mg dose did not demonstrate statistically significant improvement, results of the exposure-response analysis suggest that higher doses may produce better efficacy, and the safety profile of ABT-126 in this study supports additional studies with higher doses in subjects with mild-to-moderate AD.</p
