1,721,037 research outputs found
Weigel, Erhard (1625–1699)
Schütze SB. Weigel, Erhard (1625–1699). In: Horn K-P, Kemnitz H, Marotzki W, Sandfuchs U, eds. Klinkhardt Lexikon Erziehungswissenschaft (KLE), Bd. 3. 1st ed. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt; 2011: 391-392
Erhardi Weigelii Arithmetische Beschreibung der Moral-Weisheit/ nach der Pythagorischen Creutz-Zahl eingetheilet
Erhardi Weigelii Artium Archit. Directoris S. & P.P. Theodixis Pythagorica, Methodo pariter & Vi pollens Euclidea. h. e. Demonstratio Mathematica, Dari Deum : Ex Numeris realibus, praecipue Corporum, Universi simul & Uniuscuiusq[ue] Singularis, Positione Totali, prout existunt, spectatorum, Atheis, ex semet ipsis tandem convincendis, ob oculos posita, Binis Vicibus publice ventilata, Binisque solennibus Orationibus proposita
Von der Nothwendigkeit der Angewehnung dessen/ Was man in gerechter Maß und Weiß zu thun hat/ über das/ Daß man die Wissenschafft davon gelernet hat : Samt einer Kurtzen Relation, Wie weit es mit der angestellten Kunst- und Tugend-Schul bißher gekommen sey. Dabey die ins gemein so operos und schwer getriebene Sprachen Mit pur lauter erbarer Lust/ Dazu die Kinder von Natur geneigt/ In steten reden/ lesen/ schreiben/ singen/ rechnen/ messen/ mahlen/ reiten/ höfflich gehen und sich wenden/ auff und aus Papier Figuren machen/ und dergleichen/ auff das leichteste geübet werden / [Erhard Weigel]
Dissertationem Academicam de Corpore, Divini Numinis Charactere Demonstrativo, Clarissimo Praeside ... Dn. Erhardo Weigelio ... Ad Diem Aug. A.O.R. M.DC.LXXV. publico examini subiiciet Georgius Schneider/ Vratislaviensis Silesius
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
